The comparison is both in a clean configuration with no stores internally and externally and max internal fuel.You reduce a lot of drag by not having external carry.
The comparison is both in a clean configuration with no stores internally and externally and max internal fuel.You reduce a lot of drag by not having external carry.
You probably don’t want to use wet thrust for this type of calculation since we’re talking about cruise here. Dry thrust is… also far from perfect, but probably a better gauge. Take around 76.5kn dry thrust of an al-31f and do the same calculations we get that the J-35A’s engines should have dry thrust somewhere in the vicinity of around 64kn, which isn’t unrealistic if you compare it to things like F-414EPE, EJ200 and the likes.Assuming 8100kg internal fuel and equal range as Su-27, that is 16% less fuel consumption and thus 16% less thrust? Less draggier airframe to compensate for the lower bypass ratio the J-35A engines will have, gives me 23700lbf for the engines.
This is of course a very simple back of a (used) napkin calculation.
Indeed, 15k-16k lbf dry should be doable considering advancements in materials and design. 2/3*23700=15800 afterall.You probably don’t want to use wet thrust for this type of calculation since we’re talking about cruise here. Dry thrust is… also far from perfect, but probably a better gauge. Take around 76.5kn dry thrust of an al-31f and do the same calculations we get that the J-35A’s engines should have dry thrust somewhere in the vicinity of around 64kn, which isn’t unrealistic if you compare it to things like F-414EPE, EJ200 and the likes.
Nowadays many phones sold in the past 5 years have introduced "AI enhancement" as default setting to their camera app. The "fake" effect is visible when looking at details and cropping even if one does not use digital zoom when shooting. Most users would not be aware and to turn it off.I was thinking about posting that too, but something about it looks a bit off: Maybe it's just digital zoom artifacts, but it almost feels a little photoshopped.
what do you mean? Isn't it obvious? The windows are clearly orange tinted glasses, not dummy or cover.Which reminds me... Where's the EODAS?
sure,from 0:04:40 to 0:22:00I trust you but do you have a timestamp maybe? I want to see (or listen in this case) it for myself
Any info on J-35 internal weapon bay size, like how many missiles can it fit, can it carry 2 1000kg bombs or 2 500 kg bombs, etc. Could tell a lot about its role.In today's podcast, Yankee confirmed the following points:
1. The first unit to receive the J-35A will operate a mixed fleet of J-20 and J-35A.This unit has more of a research and development role than a combat one, tasked with training other units, testing new software, and pioneering new tactics.
2. The J-35A also serves as an aggressor aircraft, simulating the large numbers of F-35 in China's vicinity during BVR and close-range air combat training.
3. The J-35A's internal fuel capacity exceeds 8 tons, giving it a range no weaker than that of older Flanker variants
Sorry, there is no information on this matter.Any info on J-35 internal weapon bay size, like how many missiles can it fit, can it carry 2 1000kg bombs or 2 500 kg bombs, etc. Could tell a lot about its role.
Any info on J-35 internal weapon bay size, like how many missiles can it fit, can it carry 2 1000kg bombs or 2 500 kg bombs, etc. Could tell a lot about its role.
It can be inferred from previously know information and some rumours.Sorry, there is no information on this matter.
In today's podcast, Yankee confirmed the following points:
1. The first unit to receive the J-35A will operate a mixed fleet of J-20 and J-35A.This unit has more of a research and development role than a combat one, tasked with training other units, testing new software, and pioneering new tactics.
2. The J-35A also serves as an aggressor aircraft, simulating the large numbers of F-35 in China's vicinity during BVR and close-range air combat training.
3. The J-35A's internal fuel capacity exceeds 8 tons, giving it a range no weaker than that of older Flanker variants