If that's the actual design then I have legitimate concerns about its RCS.
P>S>? or a real thing?
I only have a basic understanding of stealth shaping (what I could glean from wikipedia and online forums), but that design has serious planform alignment issues and having the canards not only sit on a different plane but being elevated diagonally creates extra angles that need to be taken care of when accounting for the direction of radar reflection. Unless they tested that design and shaped everything so that radar is reflected away even without the planform alignment that kinda design will pose problems for RCS.May I ask why, out of interest? Both of airsuperiority and challenge's pictures (though probably not reflective of the real thing) have obvious stealth shaping.
Ah right. Pushing this topic a little, I think the canards on that picture is on the same plane, and is aligned with the main wing (leading edge and triangular trailing edge area which kind of bends into the engine nozzles).I only have a basic understanding of stealth shaping (what I could glean from wikipedia and online forums), but that design has serious planform alignment issues and having the canards not only sit on a different plane but being elevated diagonally creates extra angles that need to be taken care of when accounting for the direction of radar reflection. Unless they tested that design and shaped everything so that radar is reflected away even without the planform alignment that kinda design will pose problems for RCS.
One possible reason we don't see planform alignment from the top view is because in fact the angles of the canards are in fact in alignment with the main wing, only in that elevated position, so the canard shape itself is a different shape but forms the same angle in that tilt. Still, I don't know if that would work.