J-20... The New Generation Fighter III

Status
Not open for further replies.

peperez

New Member
I think the J20 will have more range/endurance with stealth mode (no external ordnance). Personally I think that will be the keyfactor. If you can turn and burn, it is nice but you pretty much destroy the stealth mode with that. What will matter is the way the computing power and sensors are added value... If Chine can move from J6 tot J20 in a decade or 2... I trust they can shock us with more.

The F-22 is famous for its long range in stealth mode using supercruise...

All three will be very similar, believe me.

Cheers

Pepe
 

siegecrossbow

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Interesting new insights on the J-20 and China's potential sixth gen fighter, coming from a PLAAF Korean War ACE pilot:

Interview link:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


What do you think of China’s new J-20 stealth aircraft?

I was invited to watch the J-20’s first flight at Chengdu, and I asked the engineers a few questions. Fighter aircraft seem to have reached their maximum limits. Whether the aircraft is made in the U.S. or Russia, there is not much difference between the latest aircraft from these countries. Further development is limited by the physical stress a pilot’s body can tolerate. The U.S. is leading the way in the use of unmanned aircraft. I think there is a role for unmanned aircraft in China.
 

Lion

Senior Member
Interesting new insights on the J-20 and China's potential sixth gen fighter, coming from a PLAAF Korean War ACE pilot:

Interview link:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

No doubt there is role for UAV.. I doubt UAV is able replace manned 5th gen fighter in the next 20 yrs.

Remember this commander retired in the 1993 where PLAAF still stuck in the era of dogfight only. Not even a single BVRAAM was available. Not to mention the kind advanced radar/ avionics , truely integrated air defense , datalink and strong EW aerial.
warfare.

He merely see from an angle of dogfight and outdated doctrine. While not from an area of whole package needed in modern era of aerial warfare.
 

SteelBird

Colonel
No doubt there is role for UAV.. I doubt UAV is able replace manned 5th gen fighter in the next 20 yrs.

Remember this commander retired in the 1993 where PLAAF still stuck in the era of dogfight only. Not even a single BVRAAM was available. Not to mention the kind advanced radar/ avionics , truely integrated air defense , datalink and strong EW aerial.
warfare.

He merely see from an angle of dogfight and outdated doctrine. While not from an area of whole package needed in modern era of aerial warfare.

I can't agree with you, Lion. He retired in 1993 doesn't mean his knowledge stops at 1993's. He said "I think there is a role for unmanned aircraft in China." doesn't mean that when UAV exists, 5 gen manned aircraft will be obsolete but there is a potential role that UAV would be useful.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
I can't agree with you, Lion. He retired in 1993 doesn't mean his knowledge stops at 1993's. He said "I think there is a role for unmanned aircraft in China." doesn't mean that when UAV exists, 5 gen manned aircraft will be obsolete but there is a potential role that UAV would be useful.

UAV can play as support role for the maned fighter jets. Think of it as an auto pilot wing man that can be control either by land base, the pilot, or AEWAC crew.
 

Player99

Junior Member
Chinese J-20 and Russian T-50 are just prototypes. They are far from operations. Only after that one could say which is better.

Cheers

Pepe

And on top of that, even the F-22 never has experienced real battle, nobody can say for sure, at least nobody can convince others, how good it really is in battle, let alone in battle with the yet-to-be-inducted J-20 or T-50. Thus, anyone attempting to make such comparison borders on bullshitting with a straight face.
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
[QUOTE=Munir;189892]I think the J20 will have more range/endurance with stealth mode (no external ordnance). Personally I think that will be the keyfactor. If you can turn and burn, it is nice but you pretty much destroy the stealth mode with that.


Not so much, the Raptor is able to turn and burn while at Mach 1.8 in supercruise, using the OVT, remaining quite stealthy!

---------- Post added at 04:02 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:27 PM ----------

And on top of that, even the F-22 never has experienced real battle, nobody can say for sure, at least nobody can convince others, how good it really is in battle, let alone in battle with the yet-to-be-inducted J-20 or T-50. Thus, anyone attempting to make such comparison borders on bullshitting with a straight face.

Red Flag/Top Gun, etc., etc., are beyond realistic, the only diff is that no live ammo is intentionally released, people strategize, fly, and fight to their full capability, airplanes break {F-15 in Missouri broke in half behind the cockpit, due to manu defect with the longerons], and people die [Capt Haney in Alaska] in F-22. Second Fatal While I appreciate your point and your candor, and your humor, your presupposition is inaccurate. To be perfectly honest, someone familiar with these aircraft can make an accurate prediction of how things will go in a real head to head. Yes every once in a while someone is lucky, [or good?], but that anamoly will be the exception rather than the rule, You can do it in your head, or on the computer, Dr. Song himself expains how good the engines on the Raptor are, and the airframe is very stealthy and very agile, and capable of ACM in Supercruise. It will be very tough to catch, let alone defeat, when Air Force Gen Mike Hostage states that it is the "the most capable combat aircraft in the world", he is not just "whistleing Dixie" He made this statement to the press at a May 7, 2012 news conference regarding the Raptor's deployment to the middle East, in which he also stated people pay attention to were this airplane goes, Gen Hostage is head of Air Combat Command.[COLOR="Silver
 

Miragedriver

Brigadier
UAV can play as support role for the maned fighter jets. Think of it as an auto pilot wing man that can be control either by land base, the pilot, or AEWAC crew.

I know we are straying off topic here, but I’ve been curious about UVA’s and their possible roll as an AWCA aircraft were the operators are ground based, or controlled by a larger AWAC aircraft. These UAV’s could be used in high threat environments, by themselves, or to extend the range of existing AWAC when used in conjunction.
Any thoughts?
 

Player99

Junior Member
Red Flag/Top Gun, etc., etc., are beyond realistic, the only diff is that no live ammo is intentionally released, people strategize, fly, and fight to their full capability, airplanes break {F-15 in Missouri broke in half behind the cockpit, due to manu defect with the longerons], and people die [Capt Haney in Alaska] in F-22. Second Fatal While I appreciate your point and your candor, and your humor, your presupposition is inaccurate. To be perfectly honest, someone familiar with these aircraft can make an accurate prediction of how things will go in a real head to head. Yes every once in a while someone is lucky, [or good?], but that anamoly will be the exception rather than the rule, You can do it in your head, or on the computer, Dr. Song himself expains how good the engines on the Raptor are, and the airframe is very stealthy and very agile, and capable of ACM in Supercruise. It will be very tough to catch, let alone defeat, when Air Force Gen Mike Hostage states that it is the "the most capable combat aircraft in the world", he is not just "whistleing Dixie" He made this statement to the press at a May 7, 2012 news conference regarding the Raptor's deployment to the middle East, in which he also stated people pay attention to were this airplane goes, Gen Hostage is head of Air Combat Command.[COLOR="Silver

Brat, my remarks were hardly contention to your arguments abovef. My key words are "in battle". And my sentiment is against armchair fighter performance analysts running amok on the Internet. Prediction would be legitimate and fairly accurate by a true expert such as Dr. Song or the pilots, especially those who have actually been on such aircraft themselves, or someone who really spends time studying these things. Even then, a prediction is just a prediction. And by definition and for its practical utility, a prediction has to be empirically proven to become a fact.
 
Last edited:

MiG-29

Banned Idiot
I know we are straying off topic here, but I’ve been curious about UVA’s and their possible roll as an AWCA aircraft were the operators are ground based, or controlled by a larger AWAC aircraft. These UAV’s could be used in high threat environments, by themselves, or to extend the range of existing AWAC when used in conjunction.
Any thoughts?

Saludos

They say the 6th generation fighter will be unmanned and some of its variants manned.

The americans will pit their 6th generation fighters against J-20 or T-50, and already UCAVs can be used for surveillance role so it will be logic send a UCAV versus a J-20 to illuminate it and fire a AIM-120 either by another UCAV or a F-35

---------- Post added at 01:35 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:30 AM ----------

Red Flag/Top Gun, etc., etc., are beyond realistic, the only diff is that no live ammo is intentionally released, people strategize, fly, and fight to their full capability, airplanes break {F-15 in Missouri broke in half behind the cockpit, due to manu defect with the longerons], and people die [Capt Haney in Alaska] in F-22. Second Fatal While I appreciate your point and your candor, and your humor, your presupposition is inaccurate. To be perfectly honest, someone familiar with these aircraft can make an accurate prediction of how things will go in a real head to head. Yes every once in a while someone is lucky, [or good?], but that anamoly will be the exception rather than the rule, You can do it in your head, or on the computer, Dr. Song himself expains how good the engines on the Raptor are, and the airframe is very stealthy and very agile, and capable of ACM in Supercruise. It will be very tough to catch, let alone defeat, when Air Force Gen Mike Hostage states that it is the "the most capable combat aircraft in the world", he is not just "whistleing Dixie" He made this statement to the press at a May 7, 2012 news conference regarding the Raptor's deployment to the middle East, in which he also stated people pay attention to were this airplane goes, Gen Hostage is head of Air Combat Command.[COLOR="Silver


The F-22 in my opinion will be the best stealth fighter for a long time, since J-20 or T-50 have compromised more.
But that could change as long as the Chinese and Russians develop better detecting systems.

Anyway in wars what is important is win not how many aircraft you lose, the Soviet Union defeated Germany by sending more fighters or average quality over the few Me-262, yeah the Germans had the better aircraft, they downed many soviet fighters but at the end the Soviet Union won so victory is victory as long as nation fighting the war achieve the political goals they want.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top