J-20 5th Generation Fighter VII


by78

Brigadier
I feel this video does not need a to be summarized. This video has English translation for everyone to read.

Apologize if I have broken forum rule
Could you not post speculations from some random 'internet commentator' here? Sinodefenceforum isn't a fanboy forum.
 

bomberman

Junior Member
Registered Member
Could you not post content from some random internet commentator here? Sinodefenceforum isn't a fanboy forum.
You seem love to call everyone a "fanboy". Does it make you feel better that your a professional and I am not? If you think that this video is not in the right section, you can just ask me to remove it or admin to remove it.
 

by78

Brigadier
You seem love to call everyone a "fanboy". Does it make you feel better that your a professional and I am not? If you think that this video is not in the right section, you can just ask me to remove it or admin to remove it.
I'm not a professional, I just don't like fanboy content. Would you agree that Sinodefence isn't a fanboy forum? If so, then what is wrong with my request that you not post fanboy content here?
 

bomberman

Junior Member
Registered Member
I'm not a professional, I just don't like fanboy content. Would you agree that Sinodefence isn't a fanboy forum? If so, then what is wrong with my request that you not post fanboy content here?
Then stop with all your hostile comments to others. Be respectful to each other.
As I said, If this video is not providing the correct information, then it can be removed or provide comments on why is not correct.

I think we all here to learn and educate ourselves.
Btw, I do appreciate your posting of all the content on Chinese military.

Thank you
 

by78

Brigadier
Then stop with all your hostile comments to others. Be respectful to each other.
As I said, If this video is not providing the correct information, then it can be removed or provide comments on why is not correct.

I think we all here to learn and educate ourselves.
Btw, I do appreciate your posting of all the content on Chinese military.

Thank you
How was my request a personal attack? You posted a random internet video from a random commentator, who made all kinds of caveats about "based on this map of the deployed forces and force structure, blah blah blah, but the map is out of date...", "blah blah blah, but this is just my personal speculation..." "blah blah blah, but I don't know..." "blah blah blah, but I don't know who to ask, so blah blah blah...", "blah blah blah, I don't dare to ask those in the know whom I don't actually know, so let me blah blah blah...", and blah blah blah. His entire video is a waste of time because it's a big nothing-burger at best. And going through his Youtube channel, he helpfully offers gems such as his views on the Islamization of Xinjiang, how China should punish the NBA, the Brexit drama, so on and on. Just a jumble of his opinions on endless political drama, most of them come with catchy titles that begin with "how powerful is so-and-so's blah blah blah ..." "How awesome is so-and-so and blah blah blah...". To be honest, the guy is a real all-around crackpot, almost a Chinese Fareed Zakaria without a job offer from CNN.

And you thought highly of his views enough to post one of his videos here. Just why? And why were you offended when I asked you not to post such videos from him again?

I'm telling you, his video – and content of his kind – do not meet Sinodefence's standards. There, you said you are here to learn, and you've just learned something.
 
Last edited:

bomberman

Junior Member
Registered Member
How was my request a personal attack? You posted a random internet video from a random commentator, who made all kinds of caveats about "based on this map of the deployed forces and force structure, but this is out of date...", "this is just my personal speculation..." "I don't know..." "I don't know who to ask...", "I don't dare to ask those in the know whom I don't know...", and blah blah blah. His entire video is a waste of time because it's a big nothing-burger. And going through his Youtube channel, we have such gems as his views on the Islamization of Xinjiang, how China should punish the NBA, the Brexit drama, so on and on. To be honest, the guy is a real all-around crackpot, almost a Chinese Fareed Zakaria without a job offer from CNN.

And you thought highly of his views enough to post one of his videos here. Why? And why are you offended when I asked you not to post such videos from him again? I'm telling you, his video – and content of his kind – do not meet Sinodefence's standards. There, you said you are here to learn, and you've just learned something.
This would have been a great post, instead using the statement "This is not a fanboy forum". That is fine, Your have your opinion on why this video is not up to standard for this forum. So let everyone else have their opinion as well?


How was my request a personal attack? You posted a random internet video from a random commentator, who made all kinds of caveats about "based on this map of the deployed forces and force structure, blah blah blah, but the map is out of date...", "blah blah blah, but this is just my personal speculation..." "blah blah blah, but I don't know..." "blah blah blah, but I don't know who to ask, so blah blah blah...", "blah blah blah, I don't dare to ask those in the know whom I don't actually know, so let me blah blah blah...", and blah blah blah. His entire video is a waste of time because it's a big nothing-burger at best. And going through his Youtube channel, he helpfully offers gems such as his views on the Islamization of Xinjiang, how China should punish the NBA, the Brexit drama, so on and on. Just a jumble of his opinions on endless political drama, most of them come with catchy titles that begin with "how powerful is so-and-so's blah blah blah ..." "How awesome is so-and-so and blah blah blah...". To be honest, the guy is a real all-around crackpot, almost a Chinese Fareed Zakaria without a job offer from CNN.

And you thought highly of his views enough to post one of his videos here. Just why? And why were you offended when I asked you not to post such videos from him again?

I'm telling you, his video – and content of his kind – do not meet Sinodefence's standards. There, you said you are here to learn, and you've just learned something.
This would have been a great post, instead using the statement "This is not a fanboy forum". That is fine, Your have your opinion on why this video is not up to standard for this forum. So let everyone else have their opinion as well?

If this video is not up to the standard of this forum, you can ask the admin to remove it and provide your above comments why you it is so.

This is my last comment on this topic.
Apologize to all members, if this video is not right for this forum. I am not able to remove it. Admin, please help removing the video

Thank you
 
Last edited:

Bltizo

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Okay, both of you please knock it off.

@bomberman -- by78 is correct that we try to encourage more credible and productive sources and discussions here. You've had an account for a few years now, you should know how it works here and what is credible and what isn't very credible.
If you're posting something, please offer some commentary of it. If you're posting something with unknown credibility that you are unsure about, feel free to post it and ask others if it is worth paying attention to.
Basically, we hope that articles, videos, pictures and the like can all be critically judged by users in terms of their credibility, their veracity and their relevance to current discussion, before it is posted here. These flagship threads aren't an aggregation forum for all manner of random commentaries and random videos or random pictures about their given topics. Try to keep contributions relevant and useful.


@by78 -- I know where you're coming from but consider being a little less venomous in your rebuttals. As you say we do strive to be a professional forum here in some ways, being more professional in the dismissals of non-credible or irrelevant articles, pictures or videos is desirable.
 
Last edited:

bomberman

Junior Member
Registered Member
Okay, both of you please knock it off.

@bomberman -- by78 is correct that we try to encourage more credible and productive sources and discussions here. You've had an account for a few years now, you should know how it works here and what is credible and what isn't very credible.
If you're posting something, please offer some commentary of it. If you're posting something with unknown credibility that you are unsure about, feel free to post it and ask others if it is worth paying attention to.
Basically, we hope that articles, videos, pictures and the like can all be critically judged by users in terms of their credibility, their veracity and their relevance to current discussion, before it is posted here. These flagship threads aren't an aggregation forum for all manner of random commentaries and random videos or random pictures about their given topics. Try to keep contributions relevant and useful.


@by78 -- I know where you're coming from but consider being a little less venomous in your rebuttals. As you say we do strive to be a professional forum here in some ways, being more professional in the dismissals of non-credible or irrelevant articles, pictures or videos is desirable.
Admin

I respect everyone's opinion. Everyone makes mistakes. I respect by78 contribution to this forum, however his tones to others is very disrespectful.. As I said previous, I had apologize to everyone if the video is not up to the forum standard. As you rightly stated, I had been on this forum for a long time and I noticed there is pattern of some members whom seem to always calling others. Going forward, I will mindful of my posting.

Thank you
 

Top