J-20 5th Gen Fighter Thread IV (Closed to posting)

[Deino]

Even if still not 2003 ... anyway

 

[Blitzo]

Go through these vids and tell me which ones are real and which ones are not.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Basically no one really understands how far CGI had reached to because all of them within the link are CGI.

Yes, that's all well and good, but we've had enough J-20 photos of near or similar quality and similar angles to easily discern those particular pictures aren't CGI.

Why would anyone bother sculpting a J-20's underside with so much detail when they could simply take a picture of the plane as it's landing? Well the latter is exactly what they did.

 

[SamuraiBlue]

Why would anyone bother sculpting a J-20's underside with so much detail when they could simply take a picture of the plane as it's landing? Well the latter is exactly what they did.

I'm no psyche so how should I know why but I do know quite well about photography to tell you what a CGI is.

First focal depth. Lens can only provide a limited point for crisp focus known as focal point. IF you look at the picture again there are too many points that are in focus which is not possible in photography.

Second is shutter speed and exposure. The two are in a relative relationship in which the faster shutter speed lower the exposure resulting to less lighting. Shooting a moving object you require a very fast shutter speed to obtain a clear picture but details will be underexposure that are not in direct light.

 

[Blitzo]

I'm no psyche so how should I know why but I do know quite well about photography to tell you what a CGI is.

First focal depth. Lens can only provide a limited point for crisp focus known as focal point. IF you look at the picture again there are too many points that are in focus which is not possible in photography.

Second is shutter speed and exposure. The two are in a relative relationship in which the faster shutter speed lower the exposure resulting to less lighting. Shooting a moving object you require a very fast shutter speed to obtain a clear picture but details will be underexposure that are not in direct light.

Yet if you trawl through pages and pages of J-20 pictures you will find many and more similarly high quality pictures.

I am as vigilant as most people in regards to doctoring of photos, and that particular photo offers nothing to be suspicious about.

 

[siegecrossbow]

I'm no psyche so how should I know why but I do know quite well about photography to tell you what a CGI is.

Sorry, but what?

 

[SamuraiBlue]

Yet if you trawl through pages and pages of J-20 pictures you will find many and more similarly high quality pictures.

I am as vigilant as most people in regards to doctoring of photos, and that particular photo offers nothing to be suspicious about.

Looking a picture with a biased lens always give a good picture.

 

[shen]

I'm no psyche so how should I know why but I do know quite well about photography to tell you what a CGI is.

First focal depth. Lens can only provide a limited point for crisp focus known as focal point. IF you look at the picture again there are too many points that are in focus which is not possible in photography.

Second is shutter speed and exposure. The two are in a relative relationship in which the faster shutter speed lower the exposure resulting to less lighting. Shooting a moving object you require a very fast shutter speed to obtain a clear picture but details will be underexposure that are not in direct light.

You don't know what you are talking about. Depth of Field or focal depth as you wrote is a function of the aperture and distance of the photographer to the subject. Smaller lens aperture produces smaller DOF and smaller distance between the photographer to the subject also produces smaller DOF. DOF is also effected by the lens focal length and the size of the sensor. So there are many factors that can affect DOF, and it is certainly possible that a photo can have almost everything in view in focus.
You do know what kind of ISO modern digital cameras are capable of right? When the camera is set to high ISO you can use a high shutter speed and still get clear photo of a high speed subject.
These are all very basic photographic principle.

 

[AssassinsMace]

Looking a picture with a biased lens always give a good picture.

So you're saying you're not biased? Maybe people don't know you here but I know you from another forum and don't tell me you're unbiased. You're only here because of your bias. You're suppose to be an expert on photography because you say so >>> Removed-No need for that - Cut it out <<<?

 

[Engineer]

I'm no psyche so how should I know why but I do know quite well about photography to tell you what a CGI is.

First focal depth. Lens can only provide a limited point for crisp focus known as focal point. IF you look at the picture again there are too many points that are in focus which is not possible in photography.

The variation in depth of the object (J-20) is negligible compared the distance between the camera and the object. Hence, all points are in focus.

Second is shutter speed and exposure. The two are in a relative relationship in which the faster shutter speed lower the exposure resulting to less lighting. Shooting a moving object you require a very fast shutter speed to obtain a clear picture but details will be underexposure that are not in direct light.

This would only be a problem when one side is in direct sunlight while the other side is in shadow. This situation is not the case when taking pictures of J-20's underside.

 

[SamuraiBlue]

The variation in depth of the object (J-20) is negligible compared the distance between the camera and the object. Hence, all points are in focus.


This would only be a problem when one side is in direct sunlight while the other side is in shadow. This situation is not the case when taking pictures of J-20's underside.

Obviously >>> Removed: No personal attacks or provocative language - cut it out <<< you have no idea how optical camera works.