J-10 Thread IV

lcloo

Captain
So, basically, they're doing away with the JL-8 (the intermediate trainer) and going straight from the basic trainer to the JL-10. (advanced trainer). And they seem to be doing away with the JJ-7 as the last step and going from the advanced trainer to a J-10S? Is that the correct way to interpret
I bet the cadet pilots will be full of adrenaline switching from the slow moving piston engined JL6 to twin engined supersonic JL10 for the first time.

From the news article:-
Featuring many advanced technologies and resembling a genuine fighter with outstanding performances, the JL-10 advanced trainer aircraft combines the teaching roles of the previous intermediate trainer aircraft and fighter trainers, so that pilot cadets could skip the intermediate trainer phase without any problem, the expert said.
 

Heliox

Junior Member
Registered Member
In a CCTV interview, a maintenance person said that j10 cannot be washed by water jet because water might get inside and damage the internal or make internal structure rusty. It really makes people doubt about J10's quality. I saw some videos of washing f16 and f15 with water jet. Looks like there is no such concern.

An article just popped up in
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
where a F-22 crash was attributed to a lack of proper post-wash maintenance work. Specifically, the tapes that covered sensitive parts of the plane were not removed post wash. Apparently washing most jets require the taping up of certain joints and pressure sensitive equipment - in the F-22 case, the tape covering a pressure sensor was not removed, causing faulty sensor readouts which caused the crash.

A simple explanation could be that within the scope of a on-camera interview, some statements weren't put forward clearly or concisely? If you think it's easy to impart info correctly, you are either very skilled or have never been interviewed before :p

To reconcile the above, as members have pointed out, these are all-weather jets. But yet, the US all weather jets are documented to require taping over of certain parts prior to washing. Ergo, the maintenance tech in the CCTV interview probably meant that you can't indiscriminately spray a J10 and that you'd need to tape over or hand wash certain parts for the same reason the US does with theirs.
 

Atomicfrog

Major
Registered Member
The plane wasn’t exploded… uhmmm, land on the water first?
Feeling if the pilot eject the plane should lose control and no way still in one piece..
Have you read some stuff about the Cornfield Bomber ? It was a F-106 that landed itself after pilot ejection from a unrecoverable spin at 15000ft, it was practically not damaged, was repaired and was returned to service. But with that j-10... they probably ejected just before crashing it gently in a safe place. Engine stall after taking off?
 
Top