J-10 Thread IV

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
It is an audio, I know that is not a proof. But the speaker has a high credibility in the past, that's enough to make me seriously considering the possibility.

But where is this audio, where was it posted, who was the speaker and why is he credible? Based on my experience at the PDF we here have a slightly higher standard on credibility
 

by78

General
There is no connection to the data cable, so those points are used for moving shorter "dumb" weapons (than drop tanks) forward for aerodynamic consideration.
View attachment 59709
the inner hardpoints connected to wing tanks are way behind the leading edges of wings, where data cables are embedded.

I forgot to ask something. Where have you seen the J-10's schematics, specifically how the cables are routed through the wings? How did you gain access to this classified information? Do you or have you worked for the Chengdu Aircraft Design Institute? If so, did you work on the J-10 project? Do you or have you worked for an affiliated entity of AVIC? What's your educational background? What's your security clearance?

Or were you making &*@! up again?!
 
Last edited:

by78

General
Need to look at the canopy to tell a J-10S from a J-10A. In the picture, the fourth plane's opened canopy reveals J-10S.

51469722982_6961af7622_c.jpg


Who said anything about J-10S? How does J-10S even figure into this conversation?

The original poster thought those where J-10Bs or J-10Cs at first glance because the nose cones appear grayish, but then he noticed the lack of IRST and also their HUDs don't match. I then replied that based on the pitot tubes on the nose cones, those aren't J-10Bs/Cs because they don't have those long pitot tubes.

So who said anything about J-10S? Nobody said anything about J-10S! It was never about J-10S!

Dude, seriously, what is going on in your head? It must never be boring in there.

51469723022_acb901a5bd_c.jpg
 
Last edited:
Top