Logically, they should have a lot more Meteors than that, but it's not too uncommon for militaries to have far more shallow munitions magazines than you'd think they'd have. For example, Taiwan's main fighter is the F-16, of which they have over 100. The best missile for this plane is the AIM-120, so how many do you think that they would have? The answer is 200. And that's the country that needs long range AAM missiles more badly than just about anyone else in the world. (By the way, Taiwan has around 1000 MICA missiles for its 50 Mirage 2000s! Taiwan is not known for making good arms decisions.)
As for the May 7 battle, I'm certain that India's Rafales were armed with them. Yes, the wreckage evidence only found MICAs, but the PAF claimed that they only targetted fighters that had launch attacks into Pakistan. On that day, Rafales should have been flying two mission: strike missions with SCALPs and Hammers, and CAP; and it's these CAP fighters that would have been armed with Meteors. The latter were never shot at so none of them should have been shot down.
And this brings up the question of why no Meteors were ever fired. The definitive answer to this isn't going to be revealed any time soon, but I think it isn't too hard to conjecture about. The simple explanation is that the Indian fighters simply never detected the Pakistan fighters. Once their own planes started getting knocked down, all the IAF fighters ran for home before trying to find their enemies.
It’s worse than that for Taiwan. A not insignificant number of their AMRAAMs are stored in the U.S.
Last edited: