Indian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
I don't think serious discussion has happened on the Hydrogen bomb capability of India( in this forum atleast). The author seems to have an agenda and an intent to convince that India has Fusion weapons and tries to point to the "evidence" of "radiochemical analytical estimate of S1 Fusion weapon after pokran 2 "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


I don't think, after reading the above, that India has any Hydrogen bombs. A reliable one , One that can be put into a missile, One that can be mirved or delivered through various components of triad.
Yes I do agree that India's Hydrogen bomb capability is rarely brought up on this forum. I think its because there is hardly any information out there to confirm or deny this. I have a personal opinion that India does not have true H-bomb capability. Fission weapons are relatively far simpler to design compared to fusion weapons. In any case, the biggest Indian nuclear test of 45kt pretty much speaks for itself. Although India mentions that that same 45kt device has a designed max yield of 200kt. Yes 200kt is within the yield range of fusion weapons, but it is also within the yield range of boosted fission weapons. Maybe India thinks the small fusion stage of its boosted fission device qualifies it as a H-bomb? We really don't know. But India does have a history of declaring anything a success, even failure.

China OTOH have tested weapons in the Mt range, so there is absolutely no doubt, even in the West that China as true H-bomb capability. India lacks weapons design of such scale. Worse, we have not seen any paper or documents that illustrates India's H-bomb design. At least for China, being as secretive as it is, there are still hints and illustrations about its own H-bomb designs. We all know that for something as powerful as a homegrown H-bomb design, India of all countries will surely be hyping it up.

That author is a Jai Hind. So his article is typical Jai Hind talk. Because its India, I won't believe them until they can come up with irrefutable evidence that they truly possess H-bomb capability.
 

Nobaron

Junior Member
Registered Member
Indian voice for increasing Indian nuclear stockpile.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

But they're as delusional as ever ...
Almost entire population will have their teeth fell of pronouncing phrase like "advanced real-time imagery"& "data fusion powered by Edge Computing"
Though i'm failing to understand how would "edge computing" help them to track road mobile missiles o_Oo_O

In the mean time, i'm still waiting for their thorium based reactor. :rolleyes:
 

Nobaron

Junior Member
Registered Member
I don't think serious discussion has happened on the Hydrogen bomb capability of India( in this forum atleast). The author seems to have an agenda and an intent to convince that India has Fusion weapons and tries to point to the "evidence" of "radiochemical analytical estimate of S1 Fusion weapon after pokran 2 "

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


I don't think, after reading the above, that India has any Hydrogen bombs. A reliable one , One that can be put into a missile, One that can be mirved or delivered through various components of triad.
Morons cant tell the basic difference between fission & fusion.
A fusion bomb detonation, at that time, would have been clearly estimated. At that yield,it's not impossible, but unpossible for it to be fusion bomb. I dont really subscribe to "India mentions that that same 45kt device has a designed max yield of 200kt."
They also mentioned this
yeti.PNG
Maintaining Hydrogen isotopes is an incredibly difficult task, all country uses boosted fission/fission, while some handful of countries demonstrated the capacity. Deploying it however is very difficult.
 
Last edited:

Broccoli

Senior Member
Yes I do agree that India's Hydrogen bomb capability is rarely brought up on this forum. I think its because there is hardly any information out there to confirm or deny this. I have a personal opinion that India does not have true H-bomb capability. Fission weapons are relatively far simpler to design compared to fusion weapons. In any case, the biggest Indian nuclear test of 45kt pretty much speaks for itself. Although India mentions that that same 45kt device has a designed max yield of 200kt. Yes 200kt is within the yield range of fusion weapons, but it is also within the yield range of boosted fission weapons. Maybe India thinks the small fusion stage of its boosted fission device qualifies it as a H-bomb? We really don't know. But India does have a history of declaring anything a success, even failure.

China OTOH have tested weapons in the Mt range, so there is absolutely no doubt, even in the West that China as true H-bomb capability. India lacks weapons design of such scale. Worse, we have not seen any paper or documents that illustrates India's H-bomb design. At least for China, being as secretive as it is, there are still hints and illustrations about its own H-bomb designs. We all know that for something as powerful as a homegrown H-bomb design, India of all countries will surely be hyping it up.

That author is a Jai Hind. So his article is typical Jai Hind talk. Because its India, I won't believe them until they can come up with irrefutable evidence that they truly possess H-bomb capability.

That 45kt is actually yeild of three test combined (Shakti 1-3) not from one bomb as they also detonated 12-20kt weaponized Smiling Buddha pure fission warhead same time. Hydrogen bomb was roughly 20-25k and american experts have suggested it's primary detonated correctly but secondary fizzled.
 

Sardaukar20

Captain
Registered Member
That 45kt is actually yeild of three test combined (Shakti 1-3) not from one bomb as they also detonated 12-20kt weaponized Smiling Buddha pure fission warhead same time. Hydrogen bomb was roughly 20-25k and american experts have suggested it's primary detonated correctly but secondary fizzled.
That's interesting. Yes upon reading what I could find in Wikipedia about Shakti 1-3, it does look like a combo test. There were 3 devices, all detonated at the same time. Shakti 1 was 45kt, Shakti 2 was 12kt, and Shakti 3 was 200kt. So according to Wikipedia, technically the biggest test being the 45kt one is correct. Because if Shakti 1-3 was added up, it'll be a combined total of 57.2kt.

Nevertheless, Wikipedia is not a reliable source and details about the Indian nuclear tests are very murky. So it could also be true that the 45kt yield is probably not accurate. I do agree with the theory that India's H-bomb test have actually fizzled. If the Indian H-bomb yields only 20-25kt, hell even 45kt, its not a sign of success. I sounds suspiciously like a fizzle. A proper thermonuclear device, no matter how small should yield at least 100kt. There is no point to build a H-bomb if it can only yield 45kt during a test.
 

T 90s

Just Hatched
Registered Member
Agni-P with MaRV
Agni-P_20210628_Cropped.jpg
 

ougoah

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Took 40 seconds to down a stationary quadcopter…

Similar device built by a second rate Chinese civilian company could down it under similar conditions within under 3 seconds… back in 2017.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

India doesn't have any commercial or scientific laser production or research. The military ones they have "done themselves" are likely using off the shelf commercial Chinese laser modules which they've recased.

Military lasers for countering missiles and larger drones are far more secretive. As far as I'm aware, only the US, China, Russia, and Turkey have made these and put them on land and sea based vehicles. In the case of the US, even airborne platforms like the ABML. The other anti drone lasers that are shown are designed for commercial hobbyist drones that are frequently used by less well armed military groups and efforts. These are thoroughly unimpressive by today's standards but even here it is only developed by a small handful of countries who have a need or consider it a worthy market. Chinese manufacturing of course mean there are countless players.

It's so easy to buy lab quality lasers and hobbyist lasers that can burn through plastic at a short range. This Indian demonstration taking longer than half a minute against a hobby quadcopter shows they've either developed and given their military a laser that is next to useless for military applications or they've used a commercially accessible laser that is on the high end of power output but was not designed for this purpose. It's obvious this is the case since it takes so long to chew through such thin plastic. They don't show the vehicle and the range at which it engages. It also looks like their target drone was relatively stationary.
 
Top