Indian Economics thread.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mt1701d

Junior Member
Registered Member
India vs China in R&D spending as percentage of GDP

View attachment 68321

India's R&D spending % hasn't increased in 20+ years.
In actual USD value its even more staggering...

1996:
India GDP - 392.2 billion
R&D ~0.65% - ~2.54 billion

China GDP - 863.7 billion
R&D ~0.55% - ~4.75 billion

Fast forward to 2018:
India GDP - 2.713 trillion
R&D ~0.65% - ~17.63 billion

China GDP - 13.89 trillion
R&D ~2.2% - ~305.58 billion

So research spending went from a little under double to 17.3 times in 22 years...
 

PiSigma

"the engineer"
It's even worse once you read the article.

University education only gets cut 3%
This implies that everything else (mainly primary and secondary education) gets cut by 10%

Yet the studies indicate that for a country like India, universal primary and secondary education should have vastly greater lifetime economic returns.

That is to be expected if you still have an population which can't do basic maths or reading.

So I think we can see the effects of elitism, the caste system and Hindu supremacy at work.
Why bother with the Dalits, the Muslims or the lower castes?
Except the problem is that they make up half of India's population.

With policies like this, you also have to question how India expects to sustain high levels of economic growth over the long term.

So I think India's future looks more like Brazil.
In comparison, China looks more like the other East Asian Economic Tigers such as Japan or South Korea.
Please don't insult Brazil. I don't think India will ever reach Brazil's GDP per capita. At best they will hit 5k/person and stagnant there for several decades.
 

kentchang

Junior Member
Registered Member
Please don't insult Brazil. I don't think India will ever reach Brazil's GDP per capita. At best they will hit 5k/person and stagnant there for several decades.

Brazil has been been stuck in the Middle Income Trap for decades now like Mexico. At this point, it is hard to see how India can escape from that but first India has to reach middle income first.

Small city-states aside, there has only been two countries with large populations successfully moved from low to 'high' income since the end of World War 2. Poland and South Korea. This is why Poland is so upset at not being included in the G20. Taiwan is not part of statistics. China is at the cusp.

Cutting education is short-sighted. The single best predictor of future productivity is education level. The single most significant determinant of a person's educational success is the country's female literacy level. India is far behind in this measure. 65% for India, 93% for Brazil, and 95 for China. Until India can reach 90+%, it will remain internationally uncompetitive. India rejoined PISA so we'll have better quality-of-education data after the next round.

By definition, most countries cannot escape from the Middle Income Trap because that is what 'average' means. To escape from that, you must have some comparative advantage over your peers like natural resources, location, or human capital or else your standard of living rises around the world's average.

Sadly, China is well aware that if it keeps up the border tension, it forces India to divert precious resources to non-productive use like buying French jets.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
Brazil has been been stuck in the Middle Income Trap for decades now like Mexico. At this point, it is hard to see how India can escape from that but first India has to reach middle income first.

Small city-states aside, there has only been two countries with large populations successfully moved from low to 'high' income since the end of World War 2. Poland and South Korea. This is why Poland is so upset at not being included in the G20. Taiwan is not part of statistics. China is at the cusp.

Cutting education is short-sighted. The single best predictor of future productivity is education level. The single most significant determinant of a person's educational success is the country's female literacy level. India is far behind in this measure. 65% for India, 93% for Brazil, and 95 for China. Until India can reach 90+%, it will remain internationally uncompetitive. India rejoined PISA so we'll have better quality-of-education data after the next round.

By definition, most countries cannot escape from the Middle Income Trap because that is what 'average' means. To escape from that, you must have some comparative advantage over your peers like natural resources, location, or human capital or else your standard of living rises around the world's average.

Sadly, China is well aware that if it keeps up the border tension, it forces India to divert precious resources to non-productive use like buying French jets.

Couple of things to add.

In the 1960s/1970s, Brazil (like India) had a period of moderately fast growth.
But then Brazil slowed down and stagnated.
And prior to COVID, India had slowed down to 4.2% like Brazil.

I expect that to be sustained for another 10+ years before India stagnates like Brazil.
But given India's population, it should still mean an India which is economically larger than the USA at that time.

Since 2012, we can see that Indian R&D spending has been steadily decreasing ever year, when measured as a % of GDP.
Given the already low level of Indian R&D spending, you would expect the opposite to happen if India was actually going to become hi-tech, and presumably escape the middle-income trap.

On the PISA results, child malnutrition and physical stunting in India has somehow gotten worse in the 5 years prior to COVID.
It's a surprising development, given that India was posting decent growth rates.
But it makes sense if the upper-castes, elites and Hindu supremacists are intentionally grinding down the 50% of the population who are comprised of the lower/scheduled castes, Muslims and Dalits.

So one could reasonably expect the PISA results in India to be worse than the last time around.
 
Last edited:

localizer

Colonel
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Post-crisis, many Americans in rural areas were able to adapt, moving to cities and finding jobs, but Bengaluru, India-based social anthropologist Aninhalli Vasavi said farmers in India have few options. Even as economic realities force them to leave their rural homes, they often struggle in urban areas.

“India has not had a substantial industrial base to absorb the large population into gainful industrial or urban employment,” Vasavi said via email. “Instead, vast number of rural migrants are ‘adversely integrated’ into the low-end urban and construction economy.”
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Privatization of utilities. We'll see how that works.
@localizer

At present situation with the pandemic wreaking havoc on the world economy, who in his right mind will invest trillions of dollars in a highly regulated market with a ROI of less than 8 percent. The private sector fat chance or the international investor they had been burn multiple times before.
 

localizer

Colonel
Registered Member
@localizer

At present situation with the pandemic wreaking havoc on the world economy, who in his right mind will invest trillions of dollars in a highly regulated market with a ROI of less than 8 percent. The private sector fat chance or the international investor they had been burn multiple times before.

The main issue I see is how are they going to expand utilities infrastructure?

It's hard enough when government in charge.


Even in the US private utility companies are not really independent in the sense that their pricing is controlled by the government and are guaranteed by contract a monopoly in the area. The alternative would be to run cables and pipes for each company?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top