Continue due to size limits
Hong-Kong Protests
- Thread starter Pika
- Start date
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
That is an exercise in futility. Right and wrongs have no meaning between mortal enemies. Everything that contributes to national power, to the rise of your nation to the top of the world, is right. And everything away from it is wrong. This is a no-rules fight to the end for global domination; nobody is right or wrong. Just kill the other guy and you're right. That is the only way for China and all Chinese to see this and move forward. With 100% of the blame pinned on Western countries like the UK and US for fomenting unrest in Hong Kong, what does it achieve? Absolutely nothing. It's an empty complaint that makes your enemy smile and wink at you.
I hope the leaders at HQ see things clearly like you. I get nightmares of them seeking "social harmony" only to be backstabbed like the foolish First Nations people who have been ruthlessly exterminated with mass murder, rape, forced sterilization, and starvation.
Following on from my post, and Kyli's post earlier showing the thugs nearly kill this guy without mercy a few hours earlier!
Then come this on one of the thugs' FB page! Are they all like this!? Not one ounce of humanity in them!
Then come this on one of the thugs' FB page! Are they all like this!? Not one ounce of humanity in them!
What do think should be done? Is it Hong Kong just an arena for the two nations battling for world dominance? if so, China might have to forgo Hong Kong! And Hong Kong is unsafable!
plawolf
Lieutenant General
HK police really need to be putting snipers on shift, with RoE to allow them to terminate without warning any rioters who attack civilians.
solarz
Brigadier
We didn't want to make it an arena, but it's become an arena regardless.
If HK was saveable, we wouldn't have seen the election result we saw.
China will never forgo HK, but it will not help anyone who doesn't want to be helped either.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
By forgo, I assume you mean to forgo fostering it into a valuable Chinese city and turn it into a battlefield of political casualties. Well, in the short term, the only way to save it (other than summoning the PLA to institute martial law) would be to, as I said before, storm it with millions of violent, aggressive young Chinese patriots in red shirts. All law will be suspended due to the overwhelming chaos and it will basically be like the Purge movie series except without guns. Anyone who doesn't kowtow and kiss the Chinese flag immediately gets his/her brains splattered all over the sidewalk with a steel bat. Let the patriots kill the cockroaches and serve them street justice so that by the end, the only ones left surviving can win Oscars for their acting. And soon, they will believe their own act. No pan-democratic politicians who didn't flee in time should be left alive and of course with the collapse of the government, the CCP will take control ahead of schedule. This is a cultural revolution crash course to save Hong Kong very quickly. To the world, the explanation will be simple: no troops were used; the rioters wanted violent democracy to take over, so the Chinese youths gave it to them. They were both out-numbered and out-violenced, thus, they were out-lived. This is the method that I prefer to solve the Hong Kong problem.
But, there are other more tactful ways, which include more waiting and more starving of Hong Kong's economy, and I think even more long-term goals to be considered behind the scenes like using Hong Kong as a portal to damage and drain the Western economies that support the riots. Whether that happens now, soon, in 2047 with the full control advantage, I do not know. That kind of tact is out of my hands and up to ZhongNanHai.
But one thing is for sure; no matter the temporary pain, China is fully committed to saving Hong Kong and making her a truly prosperous city, both in material and finally in spirit.
Last edited:
Presumably, the pan-dems are supporting One Country, Two Systems and want the two systems to continue. As they obtained a (small) majority of the vote, one can say the election was about Two Systems. Just from the election outcome one cannot say that the vote was about any particular issue only.
No, you were saying something more like "the majority of the voters were supporting the violent thugs". That was different from what you are saying now.
Fine.