Sorry Just4Fun. I did not suggest india bring back corporal punishment on Kashmir. What I meant was since HK protester are nostalgic of British rule, HK Police can emulate the British practice. Caning and flogging for petty crimes was still being practice at least until 1989 or likely later, 5 years after the Sino-British Joint Declaration on the question of Hong Kong. Human Rights apparently was the least of UK concern when the joint declaration was signed.
BTW. Don't think caning and flogging was as widely practice in Australia and NZ.
Caning and flogging for petty crimes was still being practice at least until 1989 or likely later, 5 years after the Sino-British Joint Declaration on the question of Hong Kong.
Caning and flogging in public are the best tools to punish the people committing petty crimes. One of the reasons why Singapore has the lowest crime rate in Asia, and why Singapore has the best economy in the world, is that it still uses public caning to punish the trouble-makers.
HK should re-install caning and flogging in public if it wants to compete with Singapore. And China should too.
Human Rights apparently was the least of UK concern when the joint declaration was signed.
I am tired of Western trashy talk of Human Rights. What can be said a Human Rights, and what can't be? Who has the right / authority to determine this?
If canning and flogging are violations to human rights, then what can be said about the behavior that the British had never allowed universal suffrage in HK for 99 years while it ruled HK, then suddenly promised it to HKers when its ruling on HK was ended? Shouldn't we flog the British guys for their shameful hypocrisy and evilly motivations?
BTW. Don't think caning and flogging was as widely practice in Australia and NZ.
Caning and flogging are most effective in heavily populated areas because they have corporal and mental impacts. For Aussies and Kiwis, shooting was. and still is, the best.