Future PLAN orbat discussion

sunnymaxi

sunnymaxi

Colonel
Registered Member
Engineer said:
Huh? Why should I acknowledge mistakes when you are the one making them? Is this some sort of uneducated joke that I am too educated to understand?


This has nothing to do with high or low enrichment or supply chain. This has to do with you lacking a basic idea on what distinguishes a floating civilian nuclear powerplant from a nuclear powered military vessels. Go flip through a dictionary if you don't know the differences of "civilian" vs. "military" or "powerplant" vs. "propulsion".
Click to expand...
COPE Harder uncle. you are not an educated person.

its nothing to do with civilian or military. ''From a design and engineering perspective both LEU and HEU reactors shared same philosophy'' also shared same supply chain in most of the core components.

let me educate you. and if you still refuse to acknowledge then you should go to the doctor.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Engineer

Engineer

Major
sunnymaxi said:
COPE Harder uncle. you are not an educated person.
Click to expand...
Then why are you the one making mistakes, hmm? Mr. Same-but-Different?

sunnymaxi said:
its nothing to do with civilian or military. ''From a design and engineering perspective both LEU and HEU reactors shared same philosophy'' also shared same supply chain in most of the core components.

let me educate you. and if you still refuse to acknowledge then you should go to the doctor.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Click to expand...
Irrelevant. The issue here has nothing to do with enrichment levels. The issue is you not knowing the basic difference between a floating civilian nuclear powerplant and a nuclear powered military vessels, and you are trying to compare them as equals. Here is something that's actually relevant, and unlike you who is hiding your lack of knowledge behind big texts, experts explain ideas in such a way that even kids like you could understand:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
I would suggest using the term floating power unit (FPU) instead of floating nuclear power plant, to be more precise. While FPUs and nuclear-powered vessels both utilise nuclear reactors, they differ in purpose. Nuclear-powered vessels are designed for various maritime transportation tasks, whereas FPUs are non-self-propelled vessels specifically engineered to generate and supply electricity to customers. For FPU operation, coastal infrastructure is required to ensure mooring and electricity transmission onshore.
Click to expand...
See that? Different. Civilian floating powerplant has absolute nothing to do with what's being discussed. Arguing that it's relevant because of muh "same philosphies" is just you grasping at straws after being proven wrong.
 
sunnymaxi

sunnymaxi

Colonel
Registered Member
Engineer said:
Then why are you the one making mistakes, hmm? Mr. Same-but-Different?


Irrelevant. The issue here has nothing to do with enrichment levels. The issue is you not knowing the basic difference between a floating civilian nuclear powerplant and a nuclear powered military vessels, and you are trying to compare them as equals. Here is something that's actually relevant, and unlike you who is hiding your lack of knowledge behind big texts, experts explain ideas in such a way that even kids like you could understand:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

See that? Different. Civilian floating powerplant has absolute nothing to do with what's being discussed. Arguing that it's relevant because of muh "same philosphies" is just you grasping at straws after being proven wrong.
Click to expand...
again wrong.

your post has nothing to do with supply chain of critical components and parts. which is the main topic of our discussion. your first point was, Money is scare so why wasting on CVNs. better to invest somewhere else.

While both floating nuclear reactors (FNPPs) and nuclear reactors used in aircraft carriers are compact pressurized water reactors (PWRs) operating in maritime environments, they differ significantly in their fuel enrichment. engineering is the same.

you fundamentally wrong in this aspect, that nuclear reactor in ice breaker or floating ship or aircraft carrier does use same engineering mechanism means all these ships used basic Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs).

565656.jpg

the main difference lies in fuel enrichment and design but share same supply chain in many components.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top