F-22 Raptor Thread

Today at 8:00 AM
posted kinda background in
Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc. Sunday at 2:37 PM

now Military.com story:
F-22s Fire Warning Flares at Russian Jets in Coalition Territory
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
related:
The Reason U.S. F-22 Stealth Jets and Russian Su-35S Flankers Are Shadow Boxing Over Syria May Have Nothing to Do with Syria
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Are U.S. And Russia in Last-Minute Intelligence Grab Over Syria?
International news media has been crackling with reports of intercept incidents between U.S. and Russian combat aircraft along the Middle Euphrates River Valley (MERV) de-confliction line over Syria since late November. Two incidents, one on November 23 and another
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, made headlines in Russia and the U.S. with differing accounts of the incidents and the reasons they happened. We reported on the first one of these incidents
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.

With the war on ISIS in Syria reportedly reaching its final phase according to many analysts, especially Russian, are these last few months of Russian/U.S. close proximity operations a rare opportunity for both parties to gather a significant amount of intelligence about each other’s’ capabilities? The answer is likely “yes”.

There are reportedly about 3,000 ISIS insurgents left in the Middle Euphrates River Valley (MERV) area according to intelligence reports, and it is possible those remaining insurgents may be purposely seeking refuge in this region because of the complex de-confliction requirements between U.S. and Russian air forces. These de-confliction requirements could compromise the response times of both sides to conduct effective air strikes against ISIS due to the risks of potentially unintentional conflict.

The encounters between Russian and U.S. aircraft over Syria are not new. “We saw anywhere from six to eight incidents daily in late November, where Russian or Syrian aircraft crossed into our airspace on the east side of the Euphrates River,” Lt. Col. Damien Pickart of the U.S. Air Forces Central Command
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on Saturday. “It’s become increasingly tough for our pilots to discern whether Russian pilots are deliberately testing or baiting us into reacting, or if these are just honest mistakes.”

Lt. Col. Pickart went on to tell news media, “The greatest concern is that we could shoot down a Russian aircraft because its actions are seen as a threat to our air or ground forces.”

As the complex, multi-party proxy war over Syria appears to be winding down these final weeks provide what may be a last, great opportunity for a rich
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for both the U.S. and Russia about their newest aircraft’ capabilities when flying in controlled opposition to one another. Picture a “Red Flag” exercise where the “red air” element is actually “red”, albeit with live weapons and higher stakes.

USAF Lt. Col. Pickart’s remarks about the Russians “deliberately testing or baiting us” are indicative of a force managing interactions to collect sensor, intelligence and capability “order of battle”. This intelligence is especially relevant from the current Syrian conflict as it affords both the Russians and the U.S. with the opportunity to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, as well as learn doctrine. It is likely the incidents occurring now over Syria, and the intelligence gleaned from them, will be poured over in detail for years to come.

For instance, we have often explained how Raptors act as
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
over Syria, providing escort to strike packages into and out of the target area while gathering details about the enemy systems and spreading intelligence to other “networked” assets supporting the mission to improve the overall situational awareness. In fact, the F-22 pilot leverage advanced onboard sensors, as the AESA (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
radar, to collect valuable details about the enemy, performing ELINT-like missions and then sharing the “picture” with attack planes, command and control assets, as well as Airborne Early Warning aircraft.

Moreover, as we
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, it is well known that the U.S. has operated relatively current Russian aircraft photographed in air combat simulation training in the remote desert over Nevada. But those aircraft are at least an entire generation behind
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in the final phase of the vigorous anti-ISIS Russian air operations.

The danger of these close-quarter Russian/U.S. shadow boxing matches is that one of them could accidentally “turn hot”. Since both sides are carrying live weapons the reliance on maintaining adherence to current Rules of Engagement (ROE) on both parties is critical.

Another risk is air-to-air collision.

New York Times reporter Eric Schmidt
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, “In one instance, two Air Force A-10 attack planes flying east of the Euphrates River nearly collided head-on with a Russian Su-24 Fencer just 300 feet away — a knife’s edge when all the planes were streaking at more than 350 miles per hour. The A-10s swerved to avoid the Russian aircraft, which was supposed to fly only west of the Euphrates.”

The risks of this new-age cold war over Syria going hot are likely worth it in terms of the intelligence being collected on both sides though. It is reasonable to suggest that, with the recent media attention to the incidents, the pressure to keep this cold war from getting hot are greater than ever.

Hopefully those pressures on both the Russian and the U.S. air forces will keep this new version of the cold war from boiling over.
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Yes Beautiful !

Details...183 serie F-22s remains also 3 pre-serie test aircrafts, 5 get retired eventualy possible also upgraded one from the USAF museum but i fear expensive Buddy o_O

Yep, send me the bill, I'm a US taxpayer, and for that I'll be happy to kick-in!
 
Yesterday at 8:00 AM
posted kinda background in
Russian Military News, Reports, Data, etc. Sunday at 2:37 PM

now Military.com story:
F-22s Fire Warning Flares at Russian Jets in Coalition Territory
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and here's Jane's (dated 15 December 2017):
US and Russian warplanes ‘engage’ over Syria
Russian and United States combat aircraft were involved in a potentially serious engagement in the skies over Syria on 13 December, the defence ministries of both countries confirmed.

While the US Department of Defence (DoD) and the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation differ on the details of the incident, both have said a US Air Force (USAF) Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor stealth fighter fired off flares to warn off a pair of Russian Sukhoi Su-25 ‘Frogfoot’ ground attack aircraft that were flying in the vicinity of the city of Al Mayadin in eastern Syria. The nearby Euphrates River is the deconfliction boundary between the United States and Russia in Syria, and is officially acknowledged by both countries as such (the United States must stay to the east of the river, and the Russians to the west).

At this point the narrative diverges, with the US stating that the two Russian jets were engaged in this manner as they had crossed over to the eastern side of the river, and were interfering with USAF aircraft conducting strikes against the Islamic State to the extent that there was nearly a mid-air collision. The DoD told US media that the Su-25s did not respond to repeated calls to leave the area, and thus were ‘warned off’ using the flares.

The Russians however said the Su-25s were escorting a humanitarian convoy that was travelling along the western bank of the Euphrates, and that it was the USAF F-22 that crossed the deconfliction boundary to harass its aircraft. The F-22 was then chased away by a Su-35 ‘Flanker-E’ fighter that was providing top-cover for the Su-25s, the Russian defence ministry said.

While this particular incident did not end badly for either side, the potential for a more serious outcome appears to be rising as such encounters increase.

...
... the rest is behind paywall at
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
now yet another story:
U.S. F-22 Narrowly Avoids Collision With Russian Su-25 Over Syria
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Tensions are running high between the U.S. and Russia over operations in Syria after an
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
narrowly avoided colliding with a Russian Su-25 in midair.

Two Russian Su-25s on Dec. 13 flew into coalition airspace on the east side of the Euphrates River near Abu Kamal, Syria, violating verbal agreements that the Russians would remain west of the river and the coalition would operate to the east, according to an Air Forces Central Command spokesman. Two stealthy F-22 Raptors patrolling the area immediately noticed the Su-25s, —1980s-era fighters designed to provide close-air support for ground forces—and moved to intercept them.

The F-22s released chaff and flares near the Russian aircraft, and placed multiple calls to the Russian pilots on the emergency Guard frequency asking them to leave the airspace. However, the Su-25 pilots did not immediately move to depart the area.

At one point, one Su-25 flew close enough to an F-22 that the Raptor pilot was forced to “aggressively maneuver” to avoid a midair collision, the spokesman said.

At another point, a Russian Su-35 also flew across the river, and was shadowed closely by one of the Raptor pilots.

The incident lasted approximately 40 min. before the Russian aircraft finally flew back to the west side of the river.

During and after the event, coalition leaders at the Combined Air Operations Center (CAOC) at Al Udeid air base, Qatar, contacted the Russians over the deconfliction phone line “to de-escalate the situation and avert a strategic miscalculation,” the spokesman said.

Although high profile, the Dec. 13 incident is not the first time the Russians have violated verbal agreements with the coalition. Since early November, the Russians have flown into U.S. and coalition airspace on the east side of the river 6-8 times per day or approximately 10% percent of Russian and Syrian flights.

“If either of us needs to cross the river for any reason, we’re supposed to first deconflict via the line,” the spokesman said. “It’s become increasingly tough for our pilots to discern whether Russian pilots’ actions are deliberate or if these are just honest mistakes.”

The coalition’s greatest concern, the spokesman stressed, is that they could shoot down a Russian aircraft because its actions are seen as a threat to air or ground forces.

“We train our aircrew to take specific actions and to make every attempt possible to de-escalate the situation wherever possible,” the spokesman said. “We are not here to fight the Russians and Syrians—our focus remains on defeating ISIS. That said, if anyone threatens coalition or friendly partner forces in the air or on the ground, we will defend them.”

U.S. pilots have observed increasingly alarming behavior for months as Islamic State militants lose ground in Iraq and Syria, officials told Aerospace DAILY during November visits to the CAOC and Al Dhafra air base, UAE. Lt. Col. “Ox,” a U.S. Air Force F-22 Raptor pilot and commander of the 95th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron assigned to Al Dhafra, said his pilots have had numerous close calls, with Russian aircraft frequently flying within weapons range of coalition ground troops.

The Russians fighters—primarily Su-30s, Su-35s, Su-27 Flankers and Su-17 Fitters—have not made moves to attack U.S. or coalition forces, but their proximity to the ground itself is threatening, said Ox, who requested partial anonymity to discuss sensitive operations. Russian fighters regularly fly within range of coalition ground forces for twenty or thirty minutes at a time, he noted.

“We have to use our judgment to figure out, is this somebody getting close to attack our guys? Or is this somebody that is just flying a wide pattern?” Ox said. “You don’t know if they are doing this to test us, to see what our response is, or if it’s completely innocent. That’s the call that we have to make every day.”
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
Looks like the Su-35 discovered the location of F-22 Raptor once it fires off flares to warn off the Su-25 who doing escort mission that got into US control air space over in Syria. My concern about this story is why didn't the F-22 radar detect the Su-35 was escorting the Su-25 mission? o_O

The F-22 came face to face with Russia's top fighter and was at a major disadvantage

Business Insider•December 14, 2017


c16390aba643a46924b98ab0a61ce1ef

The F-22 came face to face with Russia's top fighter and was at a major disadvantage
The top American and Russian fighter jets this week had their first run-in in the skies above Syria, and the incident favored the Russian jet if combat were to break out. The US's F-22 doesn't visibly store weapons, and it relies on stealth, so coming face to face with an advanced Russian fighter puts it at a disadvantage. Two US F-22 stealth fighter jets intercepted Russian Su-25 and Su-35 jets that crossed into the US's area of operation over Syria on Wednesday, and it highlights a downside to the US's top fighter jets. While the F-35 has been built as a flying quarterback that can dogfight, bomb ground targets, gather intelligence, or conduct surveillance, the F-22 specializes in one thing: air-to-air combat.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Wait a minute, I thought this suppose to be bad boy F-22 is stealth.o_O



Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
obviously someone is behind the times. Had to make sure it was not written by Pierre Sprey The designer of the F16 who never worked at General Dynamics. Designer of the A10 who never worked at Fairchild Republic Critic of the F15 yet Was in a Documentary about it proclaiming it an Excellent Aircraft. And is Hopefully doing better in the Recording industry...
The F-22, with its
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in air and all-aspect stealth cloaking it from enemies at a distance, is the US's most lethal combat plane.
Accurate to a point. The reason for the "incredible acrobatic abilities" Is so that it can engage at close range as well as long. I can Snipe and Knife fight.
While the F-35 has been
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that can dogfight, bomb ground targets, gather intelligence, or conduct surveillance, the F-22 specializes in one thing: air-to-air combat.
F22's have been performing ground strikes in Syria, There Radar means they can also Quarterback.
But with today's rules of engagement, the F-22's huge advantages in stealth mean little.
Bull, Those Flankers had the Fear of god instilled in them the moment the Raptor closed range and said hello.
There Air maneuverability is designed to out Flanker a Flanker.
During an intercept, a jet pulls up next to the plane that has invaded its airspace and tells the plane via radio some version of "turn around or this will escalate."
And that is it's job. We are not at war with the Russians.
At this time, it's customary for the jet to tilt its wings and show the intruding adversary a wing full of missiles. But the F-22 can never do that. Because of its stealth design, the F-22 stores all missiles and bombs internally.
So What. I think the Russian Pilot suddenly having a Raptor off his wing would scare him more than a missile load. I mean The Russian Intel Briefing on the Raptor has to go into deep detail on the missile load of that machine.
A pilot intruding into US or US-protected airspace and meeting an F-22 really has no idea whether the jet is armed. And the Russian Su-35
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, and it holds them where everyone can see.
Most of those missiles are there because the Russians are not confident in their systems. The Stealth of the F22 means even at close range it's harder for there systems to lock. And ...
On top of that, if a routine interception were to turn kinetic, the F-22 would start the battle at a huge disadvantage.
Other way around. The Missile load on External racks means that the SU35 has more drag, the Raptor with internal weapons means that the Raptor is sleeker and far more nimble in the Air.
If a fight were to start during an intercept like the one this week, the Russian pilot would start with the huge advantage of having the F-22 in sight. What's more, the Russian Su-35 can actually maneuver better than the F-22.
According to whom? If the SU35 was naked Maybe Maybe but with a full missile load?
Lt. Col. David "Chip" Berke, the only US Marine to fly both the F-22 and the F-35,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
that when flying the F-22, "my objective wouldn't be to get in a turning fight" with an adversary. Instead, Berke said he would use the F-22's natural advantages of stealth to avoid the dogfight.
his Objective. But Raptor can turn and burn They pulled this quote out of Context. They use this Quantifier ", previously told Business Insider" Taking the Quotation out of Context and using it as a Universal.
It's like saying "M16 Jams more often" And Quoting back to a Report from mid Vietnam, When M16 had yet t have a lot of fixes put in.
And here Friends is the true point of the Argument
fifth-generation fighters like the F-22 and the F-35 were "not really necessary" for interceptions and that "other, cheaper interceptors can do the job."
basically the whole thing is meant to say that Fifth gens are not needed. Its the "Stealth Sham", "MIC Conspiracy" claim. I mean remember who posted the article. It's a Financial Blog. They occasionally have some good news but are Clickbait heavy.

As to why they didn't.. Who says they didn't? the Primary worry was not the Escort but the Striker. The F22's Wingman was likely keeping a eye on the Su35.
 
Looks like the Su-35 discovered the location of F-22 Raptor once it fires off flares to warn off the Su-25 who doing escort mission that got into US control air space over in Syria. My concern about this story is why didn't the F-22 radar detect the Su-35 was escorting the Su-25 mission? o_O


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
whatever happened, it's interesting to see the Pentagon was slow in saying anything (LOL I posted about this type of stuff Dec 10, 2017 for the first time)
 
now noticed:
Contracts
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Press Operations

Release No: CR-241-17
Dec. 14, 2017

CONTRACTS

AIR FORCE


United Technologies Corp., Pratt & Whitney, East Hartford, Connecticut, has been awarded a ceiling $6,700,000,000 indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for F119 engine sustainment. Work will be performed at East Hartford, Connecticut; Edwards Air Force Base, California; Elmendorf Air Force Base, Alaska; Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii; Hill Air Force Base, Utah; Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico; Langley Air Force Base, Virginia; Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada; Sheppard Air Force Base, Texas; Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma; and Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, with an expected completion date of Dec. 31, 2025. This contract was a sole-source acquisition. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, is the contracting activity (FA8611-18-D-2850).
 
Sunday at 9:05 PM
now noticed:
Contracts
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Press Operations

Release No: CR-241-17
Dec. 14, 2017

CONTRACTS

AIR FORCE


United Technologies Corp., Pratt & Whitney, East Hartford, Connecticut, has been awarded a ceiling $6,700,000,000 indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract for F119 engine sustainment. Work will be performed at East Hartford, Connecticut; Edwards Air Force Base, California; Elmendorf Air Force Base, Alaska; Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii; Hill Air Force Base, Utah; Holloman Air Force Base, New Mexico; Langley Air Force Base, Virginia; Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada; Sheppard Air Force Base, Texas; Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma; and Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida, with an expected completion date of Dec. 31, 2025. This contract was a sole-source acquisition. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, is the contracting activity (FA8611-18-D-2850).
and on top of it seven bil now ...:
Contracts
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Press Operations

Release No: CR-246-17
Dec. 21, 2017

CONTRACTS


AIR FORCE

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co., Fort Worth, Texas, has been awarded an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract with a total estimated value of $7,000,000,000 for F-22 sustainment. This contract provides for comprehensive F-22 air vehicle sustainment. Work will be performed at five operational bases Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska; Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada; Tyndall Air Force Base, Florida; Joint Base Langley-Eustis, Virginia; and Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii; and at six support locations Edwards Air Force Base, California; Palmdale, California; Hill Air Force Base, Utah; Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma; Sheppard Air Force Base, Texas; and Warner Robins Air Force Base, Georgia, as well as at other potential stateside and overseas locations, combat deployment and enroute support bases, potential locations through depot partnering agreements, and system program office locations. The contract has a five-year base ordering period with work expected to be completed by Dec. 31, 2027. This award is the result of a sole-source acquisition. Fiscal 2018 operations and maintenance funds in the amount of $1,906,535 are being obligated at the time of award. Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, Hill Air Force Base, Utah, is the contracting activity (FA8205-18-D-0001).
 
Top