Discussing Biden's Potential China Policy

  • Thread starter Deleted member 15887
  • Start date

crash8pilot

Junior Member
Registered Member
Trump brought in an echo chamber of hard core (possibly racist, ultra nationalist) anti-china advisors in many key positions. Also covid19 probably brought huge loses to Trump's hospitality and office space businesses. Biden is most likely have a more moderate advisors. The downside for China is that Biden may be able to get some alliances against some of China's policy, but trump has change the atmosphere where its doubtful too many country outside of the "usual" suspects will go along.

I think China has more time to become more self sufficent with a Biden presidency as with Trump, who knows if he would try to do something extreme like ban all exports of advance cpu to Chinese companies etc.
I'd argue Trump wasn't able to bring on any sort of competent Cabinet members as well as key national security and domestic policy advisors, because quite frankly nobody wanted to work or be associated with his administration and his incompetence... Those who were actually competent saw the writing on the wall and resigned by their own will (Nikki Haley), or butted heads with the president and were given the chop (Generals John Kelly and James Mattis). He never was able to properlly staff his administration, and as a result Trump was stuck with staffing hard-right personalities and party donors (Mike Pompeo and Kelly Craft) as well as Bush-era staffers that are way past their sell-by date (William Barr), forming the echo chamber of advisors as you mentioned.

With the Republicans looking likely to keep the Senate, I'm worried Biden might not be able to get the key Cabinet picks (Susan Rice and her Benghazi skeletons, Lael Brainard and her China/WTO ties) through committee hearing. Given Biden's age and mental state, it'll be an incompetent Kamala Harris and Republican-approved Cabinet picks running the show - same shit different day.
 

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
Anyhow, now that Biden's guaranteed to win, do you guys want to close this thread and move it to a new one, or keep discussing on this thread? This thread's title is mainly speculative about Biden's FP pre-election; we should see more concrete moves in the months ahead, as Biden becomes President.

It's still not officially over yet. Trump hasn't conceded! When he does, this thread will die naturally. So I wouldn't worry about it.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 15887

Guest
I'd argue Trump wasn't able to bring on any sort of competent Cabinet members as well as key national security and domestic policy advisors, because quite frankly nobody wanted to work or be associated with his administration and his incompetence... Those who were actually competent saw the writing on the wall and resigned by their own will (Nikki Haley), or butted heads with the president and were given the chop (Generals John Kelly and James Mattis). He never was able to properlly staff his administration, and as a result Trump was stuck with staffing hard-right personalities and party donors (Mike Pompeo and Kelly Craft) as well as Bush-era staffers that are way past their sell-by date (William Barr), forming the echo chamber of advisors as you mentioned.

With the Republicans looking likely to keep the Senate, I'm worried Biden might not be able to get the key Cabinet picks (Susan Rice and her Benghazi skeletons, Lael Brainard and her China/WTO ties) through committee hearing. Given Biden's age and mental state, it'll be an incompetent Kamala Harris and Republican-approved Cabinet picks running the show - same shit different day.
Lmao Joe Biden will just have "acting" cabinet secretaries without needing to go to the Senate, its what Trump did lol
 

crash8pilot

Junior Member
Registered Member
Lmao Joe Biden will just have "acting" cabinet secretaries without needing to go to the Senate, its what Trump did lol
Deputies/assistant secretaries/undersecretaries are elevated to the post on an acting basis in the event a cabinet secretary position becomes available, they still need to get through committee hearing and require Senate approval.
 

horse

Major
Registered Member
Hmmmm I wonder who you mean..... lol
A quick rant. :)

Huawei is a disinformation campaign from the Americans. They the US government bash Huawei with disinformation in the hopes other countries will ban it.

That is just no different that the disinformation campaign against Saddam Hussein back then.

The disinformation campaign against Saddam really worked, people really believed Saddam had the bomb. (How did Saddam became known to Americans on a first name basis, is unclear, but that kind of shows the power of American disinformation).

Today, people have strong opinions about the ban of Huawei from American pressure, the disinformation campaign.

That is really interesting to me.

Why put your faith on something, based on disinformation?

Did Saddam have WMD? Put it another way, if we walk into an American court room, and the Dubya Bush presents this evidence that Saddam has WMD, that case would be thrown out of court.

When it comes to Huawei, the disinformation does not even require proof, and the Americans will not even bother to present any. Yet, people will believe in the power of American persuasion, and there definitely will be bans on Huawei.

This belief, based on a disinformation campaign, for Saddam back then and Huawei today, that belief is unshakeable for some. But why?

Guess it pushed all the right buttons. Definitely a mystery.

:D
 
Top