The question I'm specifically asking and which I was hoping to get feedback on was whether the community, fellow moderators and the webmaster agreed with the thrust of my proposal in the opening post of this thread, specifically aiming to tighten moderation in the military specific subforums and formalizing rules that explicitly allows for warning and subsequently banning members for the below infarctions in the military subforums:
1. "Low effort" posts
2. "Irrelevant" posts
3. "Poorly sourced" posts
4. "Reposing articles/tweets/poor quality pictures only" posts
The specifics of which I described in the opening post of this thread and which of course would have clear guidelines as part of any revisio to forum rules as well.
Yes, I do agree with all of that. That covers quite a lot of things that may technically be within the current rules but still unhelpful. I see no concerns with any of those.
The only thing I can think of is that under point 3 the new rules could clarify that it's focused on items of news/developments rather than every comment so new users don't get scared that they need to have citations every time they make a post.