CV-17 Shandong (002 carrier) Thread I ...News, Views and operations

Status
Not open for further replies.

kwaigonegin

Colonel
Well, well what we got here via LKJ86
September 12, 2018
zhangfei_a927bc0d14b84108d8473ee0b05f9157-jpg.498422
zhangfei_eafc367fff1af2bfa98c3e56f7f11d74-jpg.498423

Pls elaborate so layman like me can understand. What am I suppose to see here?
 
D

Deleted member 13312

Guest
Which is in line with PLAN's land based experience.
Practice up to November 19th, 2017
View attachment 48743
then changed no later than November 25th 2017
View attachment 48744
Maybe PLAN realized that 3 arresting cables setup is too risky for fresh Carrier aircraft pilot, not worth to reduce.
3 is the bare minimum for any carrier, even the USN with their vast experience in carrier aviation still uses 4 arresting cables across the deck. Reducing the number from 3 to 2 is insanity incarnate, because in normal carrier aviation the first cable is almost always a guaranteed miss. The PLAN did be seeing a lot of j-15 shaped reefs if that was to happen.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
3 is the bare minimum for any carrier, even the USN with their vast experience in carrier aviation still uses 4 arresting cables across the deck. Reducing the number from 3 to 2 is insanity incarnate, because in normal carrier aviation the first cable is almost always a guaranteed miss. The PLAN did be seeing a lot of j-15 shaped reefs if that was to happen.
Who are you talking about?
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
They were not installed yet. The initial sea trials would not have needed the arresting wires.

The fact that they're installing them now may mean the subsequent sea trials may involve fixed wing aviation trials
Thanx for clarification... did not realize she didn’t have those before.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top