Chinese UAV/UCAV development

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
Just wondering... what makes you suspect that it is a desperate call of help, not a show of confidence?

We have not seen anything flown yet --- since 2007. Looks like the exact same model, just bigger. The FC-31 is a real airplane that flies. Its realware vs. vaporware. At least we have seen Sharp Sword on an airfield.

The entire thing disappearing completely after being shown in air shows, then suddenly reappearing after more than 10 years? Just when Sharp Sword is there and a UCAV craze gripping the Chinese aeronautical industry, I would think the timing is convenient.

The UCAV gained a lot of coverage between 2007 to 2011.

This isn't even the first time it showed up in this forums.

https://www.sinodefenceforum.com/j-20-the-new-generation-fighter.t4260/page-33

Other pics from the past.

Chinas_Dark_Sword_Stealth_drone_5.jpg chinese_drones.jpg



There is one suspicious picture I need to mention...


images (6).jpeg

I like to know if "J-911C" rings a bell to you?
 

Tam

Brigadier
Registered Member
J-911C is allegedly this project. It differs from Anjian with the forward swept wings. I am not sure if its an alternative design, succeeding design, or a competing project.

I get the impression there are multiple designs competing for the same goal. The competition can mean that one group may also try to outdo another in the publicity department as a way of helping to win the outcome.


Chinese_J-911C_Aircraft_Project_4.jpg Chinese_J-911C_Aircraft_Project_2.jpg Chinese_J-911C_Aircraft_Project_1.jpg Chinese_J-911C_Aircraft_Project_3.jpg Chinese_J-911C_Aircraft_Project_.jpg
 

james smith esq

Senior Member
Registered Member
the photo looks strange to me. I suspect it is PSed.
Look at the air intake, imagine it in 3D. The photo is supposed to be taken at side-front because the vertical stabilizer behind the fuselage is shown. Therefore the inner side of the air intake lip on the far side of the fuselage should be visible, but it is not.
I agree fake!
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
The intake lip slants backwards sharply. So it is possible that, at the current angle, the far side of the lip may not show...

If you go to the website shared by Dannhill above, it shows a photo of the F-16 on the left. The photo was taken at a similar angle as the Dark Sword. And you can’t see the far side of the lip.
The F16 photo was taken at an angle perpendicular to the center line. At this angle the other side would be invisible because of the symmetry of the intake.

This photo, however is taken at an angle less than 90 degree to the center line (nose being 0 degree), a symmetric intake would reveal the inner side partially. The J-10 photo in the link is more appropriate comparison, just grater angle.
 

SinoSoldier

Colonel
the photo looks strange to me. I suspect it is PSed.
Look at the air intake, imagine it in 3D. The photo is supposed to be taken at side-front because the vertical stabilizer behind the fuselage is shown. Therefore the inner side of the air intake lip on the far side of the fuselage should be visible, but it is not.

Photo Forensics (which checks color and texture discrepancies common to most photoshopped images) has turned up negative, heavily suggesting that this is a legitimate photograph.

2564217c1629453a4cd2ca68940f9f16b63fbdd2.53347.png
 
excuse my being late ... now noticed
China just showed it has a new 'Dark Sword' fighter jet — and it's a nightmare for the US
screen%20shot%202018-06-05%20at%20102847%20am.png

  • China released images of a new, unmanned, stealth-fighter-style jet, and they present a shocking look into how close Beijing has come to unseating the US as the dominant military air power.
  • An expert who examined the pictures said the drone, called the "Dark Sword," could give China a big advantage in a fight with the US.
  • The Dark Sword looks like an unmanned stealth fighter jet that could overwhelm the US with quantity and supersonic speed.
  • The US thought about making a jet like this, but instead turned it into a tanker, and now it could be falling behind.
China released images of a new, unmanned, stealth fighter-style jet, and they present a shocking look into how close Beijing has come to unseating the US as the dominant military air power.

China has
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, but the images of its new unmanned plane, named the "Dark Sword," suggest a whole new warfighting concept that could prove an absolute nightmare for the US.

Justin Bronk, an air-combat expert at the Royal United Services Institute, said the Dark Sword "represents a very different design philosophy" than US unmanned combat jet plans.

Bronk examined the photos available of the Dark Sword and concluded it appeared optimized for fast, supersonic flight as opposed to maximized stealth.

"The Chinese have gone with something that has a longer body, so it's stable in pitch. It's got these vertical, F-22 style vertical stabilizers," which suggest it's "geared towards supersonic performance and fighter-style capability."

Though the US once led in designing drones, it was caught off guard by militarized off-the-shelf drones used in combat in the Middle East. Now, once again, the US appears caught off guard by China moving on the idea of an unmanned fighter jet — an idea the US had and abandoned.

The US is now
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, but downgraded that mission from a possible fighter to a simple aerial tanker with no requirement for stealth or survivability in what Bronk called a "strong vote from the US Navy that it doesn't want to go down the combat" drone road.

But a cliché saying in military circles rings true here: The enemy gets a vote.

A nightmare for the US
China, situated in the Pacific and surrounded to its east by US allies, has tons of airspace to defend. For that reason, a fast fighter makes sense for Beijing.

"Something like this could transit to areas very fast, and, if produced in large numbers without having to train pilots, could at the very least soak up missiles from US fighters, and at the very best be an effective fighter by itself," said Bronk. "If you can produce lots of them, quantity has a quality all its own."

In this scenario, US forces are fighting against supersonic, fearlessly unmanned fighter jets that can theoretically maneuver as well or better than manned jets because they do not have pilots onboard.

US left behind or China bluffing
China, situated in the Pacific and surrounded to its east by US allies, has tons of airspace to defend. For that reason, a fast fighter makes sense for Beijing.

"Something like this could transit to areas very fast, and, if produced in large numbers without having to train pilots, could at the very least soak up missiles from US fighters, and at the very best be an effective fighter by itself," said Bronk. "If you can produce lots of them, quantity has a quality all its own."

In this scenario, US forces are fighting against supersonic, fearlessly unmanned fighter jets that can theoretically maneuver as well or better than manned jets because they do not have pilots onboard.

US left behind or China bluffing
Perhaps somewhere in a windowless room, US engineers are drawing up plans for a secret combat drone to level the playing field. Bronk suggested the US might feel so comfortable in its drone production that it could whip up a large number of unmanned fighters like this within a relatively short time.

Recent US military acquisition programs
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. The US Air Force has long stood accused of being dominated by a "
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
," or fighter-jet pilots insisting on the importance of manned aircraft at the expense of technological advancement, and perhaps air superiority.

Another possibility raised by Bronk was that China's Dark Sword was more bark than bite. Because China tightly controls its media, "We only see leaked what the Chinese want us to see," Bronk said.

"It may be they're putting money into things that can look good around capabilities that might not ever materialize," he said. But that would be "odd" because there's such a clear case for China to pursue this technology that could really stick it to the US military, Bronk said.

So while the US may have some secret answer to the Dark Sword hidden away, and the Dark Sword itself may just be a shadow, the concept shows the Chinese have given serious thought when it comes to unseating the US as the most powerful air force in the world.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Photo Forensics (which checks color and texture discrepancies common to most photoshopped images) has turned up negative, heavily suggesting that this is a legitimate photograph.

View attachment 47172

Can it explain why part of the intake is missing? Or if not missing, why it seems missing? To be honest, not able to find fault does not mean there is no fault, it may just not up to the challenge.
 

SinoSoldier

Colonel
Can it explain why part of the intake is missing? Or if not missing, why it seems missing? To be honest, not able to find fault does not mean there is no fault, it may just not up to the challenge.

I, like a few others on the forum, think that it's an effect produced by the angle at which the photo was taken. This is a very long aircraft, and the photographer seems to be situated right in front of where the air intake ends. Thus, while the vertical stabilizers may suggest that the aircraft is actually facing the photographer, the nose & intake of the aircraft actually extends to the left of the photographer (and thus conveniently blocking the other intake lip). The cant of the stabilizers also give an illusion that the aircraft is facing the photographer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top