Engineer
Major
No helmet, no ear protection, and is he wearing a T-shirt?
Combat video… they seem to use the gun at a decently high tempo. Why not use dedicated assault guns for this?
No helmet, no ear protection, and is he wearing a T-shirt?
Combat video… they seem to use the gun at a decently high tempo. Why not use dedicated assault guns for this?
The entire world should stop making tanks then according you, because tanks need maintenance every day, not just every other day. Tanks are not family cars.If your tank needs extensive maintenance on critical systems every other day on the battlefield so they won't literally blowup, you might as well stop making tanks.
By this logic, then China should not export any weapons. Do you really have confidence those new potential buyers of J-10CE will not crash their planes in the most stupid way? Ultimately, the people using those weapons are major factors affecting the outcome of battles.Well, as long as they don't have something to brew from a real event, those report would be considered as bad mouthing. But now they have an evidence and proof. And this can punch China's propaganda effort in the belly. For one, it can affect Taiwan, Japan, and Philippine people. Previously, they would amazed by China's military technology, and thus raise the effectiveness of China's gunboat diplomacy. People who think that China's military hardware is powerful will think that opposing China is bad. But now, with VT-4 incident, the west can brew a propaganda that make those people to think that there is nothing to afraid about China. And thus, make Taiwan, Japan, and Philippine anti China rhetoric fiercer. If China don't fix this, sooner or later, nobody afraid to China, except if China attack them for real.
Last time I check, I've never seen a western tank that has their barrel blown clean off because they were in combat for like 4 days.The entire world should stop making tanks then according you, because tanks need maintenance every day, not just every other day. Tanks are not family cars.
I've seen more interesting things, like Western tanks that destroyed their own team members for 0 daysLast time I check, I've never seen a western tank that has their barrel blown clean off because they were in combat for like 4 days.
You should check harder then. Western equipments are not immune to barrel explosion.Last time I check, I've never seen a western tank that has their barrel blown clean off because they were in combat for like 4 days.
Fangirls with acute vaginitis should be prohibited from posting until they've gotten that treated, since it's unhealthy for both them & the forum.Well, as long as they don't have something to brew from a real event, those report would be considered as bad mouthing. But now they have an evidence and proof. And this can punch China's propaganda effort in the belly. For one, it can affect Taiwan, Japan, and Philippine people. Previously, they would amazed by China's military technology, and thus raise the effectiveness of China's gunboat diplomacy. People who think that China's military hardware is powerful will think that opposing China is bad. But now, with VT-4 incident, the west can brew a propaganda that make those people to think that there is nothing to afraid about China. And thus, make Taiwan, Japan, and Philippine anti China rhetoric fiercer. If China don't fix this, sooner or later, nobody afraid to China, except if China attack them for real.
Not a tank gun? Also, who knows what happened with this one, Ukrainian guns are also in combat for much longer. Find me a western tank that suffered the same damage after only a measly 200 something rounds being fired. Most I've seen is banana peeling due to FOD.You should check harder then. Western equipments are not immune to barrel explosion.