Chinese ATGM discussion


D

Deleted member 13312

Guest
In the real world, a minimum level of reading comprehension is rightly assumed. If you don't meat that threshold, please put a disclaimer in your profile so others may take extra time to explain things to you. I again refer to the screen capture of my original reply, in case you still don't understand it.

Clue: focus on the text in the red box.

untitled-png.70934
In the real world, the common rule that if you insert yourself into an argument you are standing on one side of the argument and that without further clarification you are taking their stand whole. I again refer to my counter that we have no proof that the ATGM can be used in that matter and possibility cannot be taken as valid At which point you continue to double down.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

sequ

Junior Member
Registered Member
@by78 You can laugh all you want but it won't hide the fact that your behavior is toxic towards members who try to add something to this forum. Drop the know-it-all attitude and go eat some humble-pie..
 

by78

Lieutenant General
In the real world, the common rule that if you insert yourself into an argument you are standing on one side of the argument and that without further clarification you are taking their stand whole. I again refer to my counter that we have no proof that the ATGM can be used in that matter and possibility cannot be taken as valid At which point you continue to double down.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

If I had taken Insignius stand whole, I would have included a complete quote of your reply to Insignius in my original reply to you.

Here's your complete reply to Insignius in the form of a screenshot:
Untitled.png


Please note that the text in the red box is what I quoted and focused on in my original reply to you. The part in the blue box is what I discarded. I discarded it because it wasn't relevant. My original reply was to the red part and red part only, as you can see in the screenshot below. You can see, can't you? If you are visually impaired, please let me know.

untitled-png.70934


So, I think we now have a considerable body of evidence that you neither possess the minimum level of reading comprehension skills required to communicate effectively nor meet the acceptable behavioral baseline to function properly in normal society. Please do put a disclaimer to that effect in your profile so we may accomodate your special needs. Oh, and if you are visually impaired, do let us know as well. Thank you.
 
D

Deleted member 13312

Guest
If I had taken Insignius stand whole, I would have included a complete quote of your reply to Insignius in my original reply to you.

Here's your complete reply to Insignius in the form of a screenshot:
View attachment 70941


Please note that the text in the red box is what I quoted and focused on in my original reply to you. The part in the blue box is what I discarded. I discarded it because it wasn't relevant. My original reply was to the red part and red part only, as you can see in the screenshot below. You can see, can't you? If you are visually impaired, please let me know.

untitled-png.70934


So, I think we now have a considerable body of evidence that you meet neither the minimum level of reading comprehension required to communicate effectively nor the acceptable behavioral baseline to function properly in normal society. Please do put a disclaimer to that effect in your profile so we may accomodate your special needs. Oh, and if you are visually impaired, do let us know as well. Thank you.
Again you fail to clarify that you are focusing on a specific point, whereas on this forum it is comment to take snippets on a post to avoid the wall of text but still refer to the whole of the argument.

So drop the snide remarks and toxic attitude and go seek professional help and let people who want to have constructive discussion without the need of consistently needing to pounce on every little thing to satisfy a incensement need to feel superior alone.
 

by78

Lieutenant General
Again you fail to clarify that you are focusing on a specific point, whereas on this forum it is comment to take snippets on a post to avoid the wall of text but still refer to the whole of the argument.

So drop the snide remarks and toxic attitude and go seek professional help and let people who want to have constructive discussion without the need of consistently needing to pounce on every little thing to satisfy a incensement need to feel superior alone.

I fail to see how I didn't clarify my point. I did reply by quoting a very specific part of your much larger post and discarded the rest. I'm sorry, if you are visually impaired and don't want to admit so in the open, please PM me. Otherwise, you might also want to get your eyes checked out.
 
D

Deleted member 13312

Guest
I fail to see how I didn't clarify my point. I did reply by quoting a very specific part of your much larger post and discarded the rest. I'm sorry, if you are visually impaired and don't want to admit so in the open, please PM me. Otherwise, you might also want to get your eyes checked out.
I stated my side clearly enough, if you want to continue to maliciously misconstrue it then be my guess.
 

by78

Lieutenant General
Keep up the misconstruction then.
Are you even sure that it is I (by78) who is (allegedly) misconstruing your words? Are you perhaps mistaking me for Insignius or some other foe or foes that exist only in your head? Sad to see you so clearly confused. Very sad.
 

Top