Chinese ATGM discussion


D

Deleted member 13312

Guest
If you didn't have that famous reading comprehension problem, you would have quickly found out what my 'independent point' was, which I had to repeat nine times (aided by screen captures, text highlights, use of examples and analogies) before you finally understood it. That's your fault, not mine.

Seriously, I don't mean this as a personal attack. I'm genuinely concerned. You need to get yourself checked out.
Sure right, you started with a vague and snide remark. Continued on with 2 pictures of a Javelin, and failed to remark that compared to 2 still pictures we actually have a full motion video of the new ATGM in action which is a much better evidence form and fail to follow it up with further clarification beyond "See my point?".

As a genuine advice, I suggest that you think twice before diving into another person's discussion.
 
D

Deleted member 13312

Guest
How many times do I have to repeat myself? I don't give a rat's arse about what Insignius said. It's completely irrelevant to our discussion. You may have been having an imaginary conversation with Insignius all along, but that's your problem, not mine.
And I will repeat it as many times as you need to listen. If you fail to clarify your position on a subject and barge head on into any discussion, you do not get to say the other side misconstrue your point.

I am more genuinely concern with your desire to insert yourself into any discussion and to draw the attention of any other poster with vague remarks and double-takes.
 

by78

Lieutenant General
And I will repeat it as many times as you need to listen. If you fail to clarify your position on a subject and barge head on into any discussion, you do not get to say the other side misconstrue your point.

It's not my problem that you have a reading comprehension problem. Have you not noticed that in my original reply, I only quoted a small part of your reply to Insignius and cut out the rest? See attached screenshot below (in red box). What does that tell you? How would a normal person interpret that? Let me give you a clue: I was only replying to the part in the red box.

untitled-png.70934
 
D

Deleted member 13312

Guest
It's not my problem that you have a reading comprehension problem. Have you not noticed that in my original reply, I only quoted a small part of your reply to Insignius and cut out the rest? See attached screenshot below (in red box). What does that tell you? How would a normal person interpret that? Let me give you a clue: I was only replying to the part in the red box.

untitled-png.70934
Not my fault you fail to clarify where you stand or that you dig deeper when I counter that for the HJ-12 we have evidence to the contrary and that possibility is not a valid contentment. And any normal person would interpret it in relation with the OP unless specifically clarified.
 

by78

Lieutenant General
Not my fault you fail to clarify where you stand or that you dig deeper when I counter that for the HJ-12 we have evidence to the contrary and that possibility is not a valid contentment. And any normal person would interpret it in relation with the OP unless specifically clarified.
Do I have to repeat nine times for you to understand this again? Where have I ever said that this new ATGM is or isn't a replacement for HJ-12? It's all in your head; you imagined the whole thing. Like I said, get yourself evaluated. Seriously, you need help.
 
D

Deleted member 13312

Guest
Do I have to repeat nine times for you to understand this again? Where have I ever said that this new ATGM is or isn't a replacement for HJ-12? It's all in your head; you imagined the whole thing. Like I said, get yourself evaluated. Seriously, you need help.
And I will repeat the same to you that by inserting yourself into a argument and going along with it, you do not get to claim you were misunderstood.
 
D

Deleted member 13312

Guest
Maybe that's what you think how imaginary people in your head should behave, but in the real world, that's not normal behavior.
Nope, even in the real world you don't just insert yourself into a discussion. Go of different tangent without clarification and then expect the benefit of being misunderstood.
 

by78

Lieutenant General
Nope, even in the real world you don't just insert yourself into a discussion. Go of different tangent without clarification and then expect the benefit of being misunderstood.

In the real world, a minimum level of reading comprehension is rightly assumed. If you don't meet that threshold, please put a disclaimer in your profile so others may take extra time to explain things to you. I again refer to the screen capture of my original reply, in case you still don't understand it.

Clue: focus on the text in the red box.

untitled-png.70934
 

Top