China's Space Program Thread II

Temstar

Brigadier
Registered Member
I believe you meant that the 1st stage for every CZ-10A will be newly built, whereas after recovery, said 1st stage would be reused for CZ-10B, where it would be recovered + reused and/or discarded?


"CZ-10B is just the mover of CZ-10A's first stage," according to a CASC employee when interviewed by CCTV-13.

View attachment 177964
Wait, so this particular CZ-10B is going to be the only brand new one? All the later ones will be reused 10A or 10B 1st stage?
 

Michael90

Senior Member
Registered Member
1r9kiiu.png
Really shoping landspace also lands it .
 

ACuriousPLAFan

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Yes, safety is paramount for manned missions.

the LM-10A production volume won't be that high, and the safety redundancy for crew members would reduce ELO. The LM-10B is simply an option that makes the best use of it's first stage. The larger, heavier LM-10C, carrying more fuel, will be the real backbone of LM-10 commercial space transportation.
Some additional details from state media which are not new but corroborate some stuff that we've known

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

-CZ-10B has a 16t payload to LEO in reusable configuration.
-CZ-10C definitely seems to be in the works and will have a new larger methalox first stage while using the same methalox second stage of CZ-10B.
-Based on the description of CZ-10Bs second stage doing risk reduction on CZ-10C, past existing suspicion that CZ-10Cs first stage may use the same YF-219 engine does rise a little bit

Now, with that being mentioned, I do wonder if we'll see something like CZ-10D sometime in the future - Namely, similar to how the Falcon 9 was developed into Falcon Heavy, this hypothetical rocket would be using one core CZ-10C rocket with two CZ-10C's 1st stage boosters strapped on either side, alongside a longer and/or wider cargo compartment on top.

Theoretically, similar to Falcon Heavy (again), this ought to be able to increase the payload capacity to 50-70 tons (LEO) and 20-30 tons (TLI) (when both are in fully expendable mode), all while still largely using the CZ-10C's body. And given that the CZ-10C's 1st stage is also planned to be reusable, then we might be able to have them doing the same in this hypothetical CZ-10D.

That is, unless they plan to either develop a brand new, ~7 meter-diameter rocket for such payloads (which would negate the need for boosters, similar to New Glenn), or just utilize the CZ-9 while modifying the upper stage's dimensions, or adjusting the cargo + fuel capacities alongside certain performance parameters, or both for ferrying payloads in the aforementioned capacity range.
 
Last edited:

bsdnf

Senior Member
Registered Member
Some additional details from state media which are not new but corroborate some stuff that we've known

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

-CZ-10B has a 16t payload to LEO in reusable configuration.
-CZ-10C definitely seems to be in the works and will have a new larger methalox first stage while using the same methalox second stage of CZ-10B.
-Based on the description of CZ-10Bs second stage doing risk reduction on CZ-10C, past existing suspicion that CZ-10Cs first stage may use the same YF-219 engine does rise a little bit



I wouldn't go that far.
More like the J-10B moment
The J-10B analogy is apt; it validated the recovery technology for the LM-10A/C and tested the YF-219 on the second stage, but it is by no means CASC's ultimate goal.

A LM-10C with a 20-ton LEO payload capacity and nine YF-219s on the first stage is CASC's intended competitor to the Falcon 9.
 
Last edited:

Tomboy

Captain
Registered Member

bsdnf

Senior Member
Registered Member
Stream content from 云上天镜SpaceLens : black smoke emitted was exhaust from the Reaction control system. During the final approach to the recovery vessel, the engine replaced the RCS, and toxic exhaust was carried out whenever possible to avoid polluting the recovery vessel.
 
Last edited:
Top