China's Space Program News Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

by78

General
Some high-resolution images of the LM-5 rocket being rolled out for the Chang’e-5 mission.

50614212052_eff089000e_h.jpg

50613348193_bf46a34df9_h.jpg

50614097511_bec2eeaaae_k.jpg

50613353538_5c7b0499d6_k.jpg

50614214612_538ad9f9e5_k.jpg
 

eprash

Junior Member
Registered Member
Even if Starship gets into service it is unknown if it will be economically viable.
SpaceX can even launch large LEO constellations like Starlink with regular Falcon 9 launches.

I am rather skeptical about Blue Origin. It was founded before SpaceX with a lot more cash put into it.
It is after all owned by the world's richest man (Jeff Bezos). But the results Blue Origin has attained are rather miserable vs SpaceX.
The Armstrong rocket requires huge composite structures with the current design. These are cured within an autoclave.
Not only is that expensive like heck, there is a poor track record of using composites with deeply cryogenic fuels.
Of the two designs I think Starship has a lot more potential for getting put into service even if it isn't economical.

Given the commonality of the "921" rocket with existing Chinese rockets I think it will be "quickly" put into service.
Although speed isn't exactly the name of the game with the Chinese space program. So it may take 5 years.
I don't think it will be an issue if, say, China only gets their equivalent rocket a decade after Starship comes out.
In the timescales we are talking about for space exploration it doesn't make that much of a difference.
Also being a follower allows to avoid expensive forays into avenues which don't make through into practice.

Just consider that the typical Mars launch window occurs every 2 years. That's when Mars is closest to Earth.
Any Mars mission will be planned around that. So there will be a flurry of activity in those launch windows and no activity in between.
Moon mission profiles are a lot easier in comparison.
It's not the reusability and cost factors that bugs me the most the space plane program already takes care of that, imagine not being the first country to place a man on Mars that will suck a lot that too by losing to a private company!

It's the RED planet after all;)
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Deep space communications network. This is an all-important piece of infrastructure for missions to the Moon and Mars and far beyond. If you are truly serious about deep space exploration, you have to have it.

50614075916_fccd29a847_o.jpg
50614185597_8c5b16af72_o.jpg
50614185637_744288cc3d_o.jpg

50614076186_7bd242eaba_o.jpg
50613342023_c337b5c305_o.jpg
I made a mistake in my CZ-8 post in that I linked your post of Yuanwang ship to CZ-8 launching. It is in fact for the moon shot.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
CZ-9 program was formally established in 2016 by "key tech development and deep study of heavy lift launcher ". This is the point it turns from pre-study by CASC to program with dedicated state budget. In a way we can say that 2016 is the official starting point of CZ-9 program.
长征九号关深立项 2016.jpg
State publication 2019, milestone reached of the study (2016), and official designation is granted. This is the point like CAC 200x became PLAF J-20. I believe the milestone is the conclusion of the 2016 study. Considering the upcoming 14th five-year plan, CZ-9 would be in the plan.
长征九号重型运载火箭研制取得阶段性成果 2019.jpg
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

" 中国火箭公司改组成立并实现市场化融资 "

From now on the boundary between "private" and SOE is further blurred in the Chinese space industry. During the past 13th five-year plan, CASC has reformed (into share holding company) and brought in investment from financial market.

There is really nothing left to talk about private vs. SOE any more.
 

Arcgem

New Member
Registered Member
As an aside, I hope this 921 rocket would have a more creative name than just "Long March Heavy". We already have the triple-core Delta IV Heavy and Falcon Heavy. Maybe "Long March 555"?
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
As an aside, I hope this 921 rocket would have a more creative name than just "Long March Heavy". We already have the triple-core Delta IV Heavy and Falcon Heavy. Maybe "Long March 555"?
Most likely "LM/CZ-10". It is not a size competition with anybody in that "I beat you with bigger numbers". Example is that China still call J-20 a fourth generation fighter although US and Russia call their counter parts fifth generation. Not bothering fancy and trendy name is a clear demonstration of self confidence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top