I don't understand why Australia is so eager to fan the flames of war. I thought it was just the military looking to increase their budget, but the media and politicans are constantly 'sounding the alarm' and playing up conflict with China. If you look at a map, I don't see how China is anywhere near close to starting a war with Australia, much less 'take over' Australia. I understand Australian-Chinese trade is important to the Australian economy, but why are the Australians so eager to call for conflict? The two countries aren't even on the same equator...
China's SCS Strategy Thread
- Thread starter lilzz
- Start date
The Anglo world feels the need to rise and protect their privilege of domination while they still have it.
I hope that China and the Chinese people fully understand what’s at stake, here, and what these soulless monsters are truly capable of, i. e., massacre, starvation, Opium-trafficking, atom-bombs, agent-orange, depleted-uranium, et c.!
And, I’m certain I’ve missed, at least, one thing!
OT, but somewhat relevant to my previous:
In the past several years, there have been more and more British accents present in American television news-coverage, and “Hollywood” entertainment, some even being masked/covert. In fact, US coverage of the Olympics, right now, is filled with, and often, fronted by, that sickening accent. I see this as evidence of the coming integration/consolidation of Anglo identities/nationalities. England effected Brexit in order to further align itself with the US. They never quit the £ when joining the EU because, since the end of WWII, the £ was nothing but a, pegged, sub-unit of the $.
In the past several years, there have been more and more British accents present in American television news-coverage, and “Hollywood” entertainment, some even being masked/covert. In fact, US coverage of the Olympics, right now, is filled with, and often, fronted by, that sickening accent. I see this as evidence of the coming integration/consolidation of Anglo identities/nationalities. England effected Brexit in order to further align itself with the US. They never quit the £ when joining the EU because, since the end of WWII, the £ was nothing but a, pegged, sub-unit of the $.
Because Australia is deputy sherrif and a lacky of the USA. Like his chief, Ausralia flamed up accusations of origin covid19, HK, Xinjiang, Tibet, human rights and so on, and that is why China's response by not buying Austalia's iron ore, wine and others. China has many sources for scuh raw materials. Trade with Austalia is so insignificant, but it hurts Australia deeply because of its already low GDP.
IMO, China will not be able to hold Taiwan for long, even she takes it. It was colonized by mostly Fujianese & then lost to mainland rebels, Dutch, & Japanese before the KMT fled there.
Historically, & in the long run, attackers from the West & South always lost all wars: Japan was unsuccessfully invaded twice by the Mongols; Korea was invaded by Japan/US, but China came from the North & retook all/1/2 of it, respectively. The Mongols took C/S Asia, China, ME, & Russia; US lost in Canada in 1812 but took 1/2 of Mexico, Hawaii, Philippines, Guam, finally defeating & occupying Japan in 1945.
China will have more luck taking underpopulated SE Asia & later Australia.
Historically, & in the long run, attackers from the West & South always lost all wars: Japan was unsuccessfully invaded twice by the Mongols; Korea was invaded by Japan/US, but China came from the North & retook all/1/2 of it, respectively. The Mongols took C/S Asia, China, ME, & Russia; US lost in Canada in 1812 but took 1/2 of Mexico, Hawaii, Philippines, Guam, finally defeating & occupying Japan in 1945.
China will have more luck taking underpopulated SE Asia & later Australia.
Last edited:
And which South East Asian nation is underpopulated ?
all of them, when compared to S. China.
Australia has >10x less population than Indonesia; but if u also mean US & Canada, they r too far & will be populated by Latinos, leaving less space for others.
manqiangrexue
Brigadier
What could possibly force China's hold off of the ROC? No military force present on the island can do it and the people themselves say they aren't willing to fight. Even if they are, China can flood population onto the island. There's no way to lose it.
There you go with your false applications to history again. There's no significance to the direction; winds thwarted the Mongols at a time when there were no modern ships, weather detecting technology, and war was totally different. The example of China retaking North Korea shows China's victory over its foes; not the victory of a direction against another direction. When Chinese people call someone a "book fool," we mean someone who has accumulated knowledge from books, then fails to apply any of it properly exactly as you have in this "analysis".
Last edited: