China's SCS Strategy Thread

LesAdieux

Junior Member
“gag order” on South China Sea?

it seems the white house is fed up with Harris' tough talks on SCS.

Military officials: White House didn't want public dispute on China

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Harris' hostile attitude plus his japanese blood makes him one of the most hated figures in Chinese media.
 

ahojunk

Senior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

2016/04/08 17:34:50

201604080015t0001.jpg
Ma Ying-jeou on Taiping Island

Taipei, April 8 (CNA) President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) on Friday said he stressed during a recent meeting with President-elect Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), that issues related to national territory should not be subject to partisan considerations.

Concerned that Tsai might change course on the South China Sea after she takes office on May 20, the president said he told Tsai when they met on March 30 that stances on territorial issues should be consistent regardless of party affiliation.

Ma noted during the meeting that members of Tsai's Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) have advocated giving up Taiwan's sovereignty claims in the South China Sea.

He also said a scholar close to the DPP has argued that Taiping Island, the largest island in the disputed Spratly Island chain, cannot be considered as an island because it does not have water or soil and depends on imports for its needs.

"We cannot accept such views," Ma said at a seminar on the South China Sea and his South China Sea Peace Initiative, which he proposed in May 2015.

According to Ma, Tsai said during the meeting that such views did not represent the DPP and were the views of others, and that she "has the final say in the party."

The president also said he hoped the DPP would not stay out of the South China Sea issue after he made every effort to inform the international community that Taiping Island is indeed an island, rather than a rock.

"There should not be any lapses on this issue," the president said.

The issue has gained importance because the Philippines has argued in a case against China in an international arbitration court that Taiping Island was a rock rather than an island.

The Philippines is trying to prove that if Taiping Island is not actually an island, then all smaller islets claimed by China in the region are also rocks rather than islands and are not entitled to an economic exclusive zone under international law.

Ma went to Taiping Island, also known as Itu Aba, in January to highlight Taiwan's sovereignty over the islet and show that it can support human habitation and therefore deserves to be classified as an island.

Foreign journalists were also invited to visit the island last month to make the same case.

During his speech, Ma also insisted that Taiwan is not cooperating with China or acting in Beijing's interests on the issue. He suggested that the best way to deal with disputes in the region should be through coordination rather than litigation.

He reiterated the government's contention that from the perspectives of history, geography and international law, the ROC has sovereignty over the Spratly (Nansha) Islands, Paracel (Xisha) Islands, Macclesfield Bank (Zhongsha Islands) and Pratas (Dongsha) Islands in the South China Sea, and their waters.

Taiwan, China, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei claim all or part of the islands and reefs in South China Sea, which are thought to be rich in oil and natural gas reserves.

(By Tang Pei-chun and Lilian Wu)
 

ahojunk

Senior Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

2016-04-07 08:29 | China Daily | Editor: Wang Fan

U363P886T1D205706F12DT20160407082918.jpg
The lighthouse on Zhubi Reef in the South China Sea is now in use. XING GUANGLI / XINHUA

Country is 'committed to providing more public products and services' to ensure safe navigation

Beijing rebuffed suspicion on Wednesday over the operation of a lighthouse on an island in the South China Sea, saying it is a public service that China is providing to the region.

"China has been committed to providing more public products and services to navigation in the South China Sea. It is beneficial to the trade of coastal countries in the region and even some countries outside the region," Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang told a regular news briefing.

The Ministry of Transport held a completion ceremony on Tuesday for construction of the lighthouse on Zhubi Reef, marking the start of the lighthouse's operation.

Construction of the 55-meter-high lighthouse, which has a lantern of 4.5 meters in diameter on top and rotating lights inside, began in October. The lighthouse is monitored via a remote control terminal.

The lighthouse emits white light in the nighttime, with a range of 22 nautical miles and a glow cycle of five seconds.

Zheng Heping, deputy head of the Maritime Safety Administration, said the automatic identification system and other equipment inside the lighthouse can provide efficient navigation services to ships, such as positioning reference, route guidance and navigation safety information.

To improve maritime emergency responses in the area, the Ministry of Transport started construction of large, multifunctional lighthouses on Huayang Reef, Chigua Reef and Zhubi Reef last year. The two other lighthouses are already in use.

"The Zhubi lighthouse will further enhance the capability to ensure maritime security in the South China Sea," Zheng said.

"The lighthouse is a very advanced one with multiple functions," said Zhang Xuegang, an expert on Southeast Asian studies at the China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations.

He said the lighthouse will provide information about hydrology and weather, including typhoon warnings, to passing vessels.

"It can also provide waterway information, such as which channels are busy," he added.

He suggested having rescue personnel live on the island.

Li Jinming, a professor of maritime policy and law at Xiamen University, said the lighthouses that China has built in the South China Sea are a testimony to its efforts to safeguard navigation freedom and security.

"The US, Japan and the Philippines have challenged China on that. And the glowing lighthouse is a silent answer."

Lighthouses are part of China's efforts to perform its responsibilities in maritime search and rescue, response to natural disasters and marine environmental protection, the Transport Ministry has said.
 

antiterror13

Brigadier
I really like the lighthouse, it could well be the most advanced lighthouse operating in the world.

Obviously the light is LED, highly efficient and performance light.

Wondering what kind of power source is used for the lighthouse? solar ?
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
The world should heed the wise word of this author or conflict will occur
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

This is by no means to suggest that while describing the imperialistic exploitation and brutality of former rising great powers, China should be given an “it’s your turn now” carte blanche. But nor is sermonizing particularly helpful; in fact, it is hypocritical and irritating. The Chinese, some intone, should “play by the rules” not because Western powers did so – they didn’t – but because they say so!

Following the recent flare-up between Indonesia and China in the South China Sea, the situation is clearly deteriorating. Doomsayers warn that the South China Sea may be the “Sarajevo” of World War III. As The Economist more judiciously and succinctly put it, “armed conflict in the South China Sea is a long way from being inevitable. But it is far from unthinkable”.

In other words, while there is no need to panic, it would be dangerously irresponsible to be complacent. Above all, the situation needs to be looked at in proper perspective. China should be seen as a rising great global power, not as an “emerging” nation or part of a superficial category such as Brics, as the emerging market group of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa is called.

China is in the process of joining the ranks of the relatively small number of nations that over the course of the last half-millennium, beginning with the rise of the Portuguese Seaborne
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in the late 15th century, achieved great global power status. (The others, in chronological order, were: Spain, the Netherlands, Britain, France, Germany, the United States, Japan and Russia/Soviet Union).

Zheng-oki.jpg

ZHENG Bijian – Author of China’s Peaceful Rise to Great Power Status

What guidance can Beijing draw from the experiences of its predecessors? Every single nation, without exception, that became a great power did so through war and conquest.

The US rose by, among other things, eradicating the Indian tribes that got in the way of “manifest destiny”, by establishing hegemonic power in the Americas through the “Monroe Doctrine” (1823), by transforming the Caribbean into an American Lake, by frequent military intrusions in Central America and elsewhere, by utilizing African slaves and “importing” Chinese coolie labor to build its railways, and so on.

Recommended by Forbes
In fighting with Spain in 1898/99, it not only consolidated its power in Latin America, but also extended it to the western Pacific by colonizing the Philippines. The US succeeded Britain as the leading power after World War II, from “pax Britannica” to “pax Americana”, following struggles and actual conflicts in the 19th and early 20th centuries, such as the Anglo- American war of 1812, with Britain then totally exhausted after fighting two world wars.

The countries of South-east
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, adjoining the South China Sea, were all, with the single exception of Thailand, Western colonies, and during World War II were all, again with the single exception of Thailand, invaded, conquered and pillaged by Japan as it sought to extend its rising power across Asia: the Greater East Asia “Co-Prosperity” Sphere.

For those who would believe that “Asian values” might differentiate Japan from the Western imperialist nations, in fact not only did its behavior conform to pattern, but even more savagely so through orgies of rape, torture and massacre – notably in Nanjing in 1937.

Until very recently, China failed to join the ranks of the great global powers. Indeed when the Ming Xuande Emperor (reign 1425-1435) brought to an end the extraordinary naval expeditionary exploits of the great Admiral Zheng He (down the East and South China Sea as far as Surabaya, across the Bay of Bengal and down again to Ceylon, through the Arabian Sea to Hormuz, and from Aden up the Red Sea and then across the Indian Ocean to East Africa), China renounced a global role, turned its back on the oceans, and looked inwards, developing continentally. The Middle Kingdom over the centuries expanded, but on land, not on sea.

voyages-of-Zhen-He-oki-1200x849.jpg


From the establishment by the Portuguese of a trading port (later colony) in Macau in the mid-16th century until the opening-up reform programmer launched by Deng Xiaoping in the late 20th century, China was initially a passive observer and then, following the first Opium War (1839), an exploited victim of the great powers.

As Chinese territory was grabbed, spheres of influence established, sovereignty impeded, labor forced into indenture – hence the origin of the term “shanghaied” – there were no rules: just a Darwinian jungle.

The historical background, with the patterns that appear and implications that may arise, is essential as context for understanding current developments, forces and trends; and must inform the policy debate.

former rising great powers, China should be given an “it’s your turn now” carte blanche. But nor is sermonizing This is by no means to suggest that while describing the imperialistic exploitation and brutality of particularly helpful; in fact, it is hypocritical and irritating. The Chinese, some intone, should “play by the rules” not because Western powers did so – they didn’t – but because they say so!

Worse, confrontational approaches, such as the “pivot to Asia”, especially those involving anti-Chinese alliance building, as we know from history, risk escalating and precipitating armed conflict.

What does need to be recognized by all players is that if China succeeds in achieving a peaceful rise to great power status – that is, dispensing with war, pillage, slavery, conquest and exploitation – it will be the first rising great power to have done so.

If it seeks inspiration from precedents, for example, Britain, the US and Japan, then the past patterns of rising great powers will re-appear and armed conflict will probably be unavoidable. When it is argued by some that the conflictual past is the past and today we have institutions – notably the United Nations – and rules, this fails to convince. The US/British invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a clear violation of the rules and the UN was ignored.

Great powers seem to be immune to rules.

So, to emphasize once again, the present cannot be understood and the future cannot be envisaged without recognition of what happened in the past. This requires a lot of dialogue.

One step forward could be to establish a discussion platform (a forum) composed of thought leaders, especially historians, from former rising great powers (especially Britain, the US and Japan), Southeast Asian nations and China.

This would be with the objective of deliberating on what lessons can be drawn from the past, how to avoid repeating past bellicose patterns, and how they should inform future policy. Proceedings and conclusions would be submitted to relevant heads of government and policymakers.

Dialogue cannot be a silver bullet. It will take time, there will be significant suspicions to overcome, but, as Churchill said: “Jaw-jaw is better than war-war.”

For over half a millennium, the West has dominated the planet. When Japan rose, it chose not to confront the West, but to ally with risen Western powers: first imperial Britain (1902-1922), then with Nazi Germany (1930s/40s), and, since World War II, with the American global hegemon.


carve-up-of-China-oki-1200x900.jpg

Japan joins the Western Powers, Britain, Germany, Russia and France, in the Carve-Up of China

China’s rise marks the first time in over 500 years that an alternative non-Western power, an erstwhile victim of Western/Japanese imperialism, is seeking its place in the ranks of global great powers.

The situation is radically different from the past. That, however, does not guarantee that past patterns of conflictual behavior will not re-impose themselves. Thus, in recognizing the past, we have to break from the past.


For China to achieve its peaceful rise and for the South China Sea to be conflict-free will depend not only on Beijing, but also on all concerned.

War need not be inevitable; establishing a forum for dialogue may prove to be a modest help in making it more unthinkable. It is definitely worth trying.

The article was originally published on April 9 in
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
under the title “China’s ‘peaceful’ rise? The world must work with China to achieve this historical aberration.
 

Brumby

Major
China Outlines Plan for Military Buildup on Disputed Island

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


China’s plan for a new military buildup on a disputed island near the Philippines shows the future deployment of Chinese warships close to where U.S. naval forces will be stationed in the future.

Details of the militarization plan for Scarborough Shoal in the Spratly Islands were obtained by U.S. intelligence agencies over the last several months, according to defense officials.

The plans were confirmed last month when a website for Chinese military enthusiasts posted a detailed dredging plan for Scarborough Shoal, including a runway, power systems, residences, and harbor capable of supporting Chinese navy warships.

The shoal is located about 150 miles from the Philippines’ coast. It is claimed by Manila but has been under Beijing’s control since 2012.

Disclosure of the buildup plan for the shoal is the latest element of a dispute that has pitted the United States and regional states against China.

China is engaged in what U.S. government officials have said is a gradual attempt to take over the entire South China Sea. The Pentagon has said the takeover threatens $5.3 trillion annually in international trade that passes through what are legally international waters but that China asserts are its sovereign territory.

Earlier Chinese militarization was detected last month on Woody Island in the Paracels, located in the northern part of the sea, when Chinese air defense and anti-ship missiles were spotted.

Satellite photographs taken recently of Woody Island reveal deployment of two Chinese J-11 fighters jet, Fox News reported Tuesday.

The plan to develop and militarize Scarborough Shoal, however, has set off alarm bells in both the Pentagon and State Department because of the area’s proximity to the Philippines, a U.S. treaty ally that recently agreed to enhance defense cooperation in the face of Chinese aggression.

Secretary of State John Kerry in February raised the issue of Chinese activities on Scarborough Shoal during a meeting with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Washington. According to a source familiar with the meeting, Wang told Kerry that Chinese expansion of Scarborough Shoal would take place.

In public remarks after the meeting Kerry urged China not to take unilateral actions in the sea.

Last month, Chief of Naval Operations Adm. John Richardson voiced concerns about expanded Chinese activities on Scarborough Shoal. “I think we see some surface ship activity and those sorts of things, survey type of activity, going on,” Richardson told Reuters. “That’s an area of concern … a next possible area of reclamation.”

President Obama also raised China’s aggressive South China Sea activities during a meeting last week with Chinese leader Xi Jinping. A White House spokesman would not say if Scarborough Shoal was discussed. A statement on the meeting said only that Obama urged Xi to address regional differences peacefully and that the United States would uphold freedom of navigation and overflight.

Defense officials said the disclosure of the development plan that appeared on a Chinese military enthusiast website in March are bolstering worries.

China is calling the construction project for Scarborough Shoal its plan for Huangyan—“Yellow Rock”—Island, where a settlement will be set up.

The shoal is located about 168 miles from Subic Bay in the Philippines, where U.S. warships will be regularly deployed in the future as part of the enhanced defense agreement recently concluded between Washington and Manila.

The website included satellite photographs purportedly based on a construction bid proposed by the “Huangyan Island Township,” a municipality created under what China claims is its regional authority on Sansha Island, located near China’s Hainan Island.

A graphic with one photo outlined the development plan, with three Chinese guided-missile frigates at a wharf at the southern opening of the shoal.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Other features include an airport and runway at the northern end, an electrical plan, a water treatment plant, a residential building, a hotel, and a “travel holiday” area.

The post appeared on the website
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
March 9. Chinese authorities have used such websites to disclose new military developments in the past.

Defense officials said it is not clear whether the post reflects the actual plan of development or an earlier, conceptual stage.

One official, however, said there is specific intelligence indicating China has clear plans to build an island out of the shoal and place military forces on it.

The graphic is labeled “invitation to bid” and is based on a press release published online Dec. 15 by Tianjin Dredging Co., a subsidiary of the China Communications Construction Company.

The press release stated that Tianjin Dredging has commissioned another company, Zhenghua Heavy Industry, to build a dredging vessel. The electric-powered ship will be capable of digging up sand at a depth of up to 115 feet—an indication China plans a harbor deep enough to accommodate larger warships once the shoal is fully developed. The dredging ship will be delivered by July 2017.

Rep. Randy Forbes (R., Va.) said he is concerned about Chinese activities on Scarborough Shoal.

“China’s strategy in the South China Sea is clear, and has been for some time,” Forbes told the Washington Free Beacon. “They intend to use coercion and force to reshape the region in accordance with their preferences, regardless of international law or norms.”

Forbes called for an American declaration that the defense treaty between the United States and the Philippines extends to cover personnel, ships, and aircraft in the area.

Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Sen. John McCain (R., Ariz.) said China’s plan to build up Scarborough is meant to secure existing gains in the region and pursue new forms of coercion.

“This could include further reclamation and militarization at strategic locations such as Scarborough Shoal, attempts to expel another country from a disputed territory, or the declaration of an Air Defense Identification Zone in all or part of the South China Sea,” McCain said in an op-ed published Tuesday in the Financial Times.

McCain called for fresh policy options, such as adding an aircraft carrier strike group to upcoming exercises in the region. The carrier group would patrol waters near Scarborough Shoal “in a visible display of U.S. combat power.”

Retired Navy Capt. Jim Fanell, a former Pacific Fleet intelligence chief, said he has been closely watching Scarborough Shoal since April 2012, when China took control of the area after a standoff with the Philippines.

Fanell said China appears to be weighing its next move in a larger strategy of “tightening the noose” over the entire South China Sea.

“Heretofore, they’ve been satisfied with reclaiming and building on the seven existing outposts that they’ve had in the Spratly Islands and at Woody Island, but have not moved out to try and take ‘new’ territory within the South China Sea,” Fanell said.

“That surely will change as China’s ‘maritime sovereignty campaign’ is not just the seven existing Spratly Island outposts and Woody, but is in fact the entire content of the Nine-Dash Line,” he added, referring to the vague territorial claim by China that covers most of the sea.

China’s plans to build up Scarborough Shoal also could be a response to an international court ruling anticipated later this month or early next month that is expected to rule in favor of Manila’s claims to the Spratlys.

China may also be moving quickly to build up Scarborough Shoal over concerns the next U.S. president will be tougher on Chinese maritime expansion.

“So, in order to get ahead of this potential confrontation, they will move this year to slice off the next piece of salami—the uninhabited shoals like at Scarborough,” Fanell said.

Scarborough was used by the U.S. Navy as a bombing target in the early 1980s, something that could complicate the Chinese development plan.

However, China has controlled the shoal since June 2012 and maintains coast guard ships nearby at most times.

“It would take literally very little effort for China to come in with the same resources and tools that they used at the seven reclaimed islands in the Spratly Islands, and do the same kind of dredging and work to build an ‘island’” at the shoal, Fanell said.

China also has been eyeing Reed Bank, located just north of the Spratly’s Second Thomas Shoal.

“This is another signal that China intends to complete its ‘Wall of Sand’ to close off the South China Sea to whomever it chooses,” said Rick Fisher, a senior fellow at the International Assessment and Strategy Center.
 

Ultra

Junior Member
Good articles.

I think those who shouted the loudest are the former colonial/imperial powers who has absolutely no stake or claim in SCS. The ones that does are being goaded and proded to challenge China do so not to their own benefit in fact to their own disaterous end.

The end result in this current trajectory will only have disaterous outcome.

All the countries that challenges China that goes into arm conflict with China gets destroyed. China in order not to let western power having foothold has to occupy these destroyed countries, which only repeats what Japan did back in WWII. The exception is this time China potentially will have Russia backing them, and China has the manpower and resources to occupy all the terroritory in SCS, in fact I think China has the manpower to occupy all of the pacific.

The weakness is in China's supply line, but everyday the geopolitical noose around China only goads China into strengthening its weaknesses and prepare for war. I think China's rapid naval expansion reflects that. It will continue to expand, preparing for the eventuality.

If China is well prepared before the war, its sealanes and supply lines are solid, it means it will have the largest navy on earth, there will be nothing short of nuclear strikes to be able to dislodge it. And if we have to come to that option, everybody lose.


The best outcome one can hopeful, will be for all claimants to accept all current occupied territorial claims. Western power to stop prodding for arm conflict, thus the atmosphere will be more conductive for the reconciliation.
 

Brumby

Major
Pentagon: China deploys 16 fighter jets to disputed South China Sea island

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


WASHINGTON — The Chinese have now deployed the largest number of fighter jets ever to Woody Island, one of the disputed South China Sea islands that they claim is their territory, a U.S. defense official said Wednesday.

China moved 16 Shenyang J-11 advanced fighter aircraft to Woody Island on April 7, said the defense official, who requested anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the issue publicly. He said such a large deployment was “unprecedented,” though it’s not the first time China has sent fighter jets to Woody Island, the largest landmass in the Paracel Islands, which are situated in the hotly disputed South China Sea region.

Positioning military aircraft on the island seems to contradict Chinese President Xi Jinping’s vow not to militarize the South China Sea, a statement he made while visiting Washington, D.C. in February.

U.S. officials have said such deployments, alongside the aggressive buildup of manmade islands throughout the South China Sea, threaten stability in the region. They have repeatedly called for China and other countries that claim disputed territory in the South China Sea, a key international shipping route, not to militarize the land in the area.

Defense Secretary Ash Carter is now in the Philippines, where he will visit bases that the United States considers critical to countering Chinese aggression in the region. The bases are about 100 miles east of the contested Spratly Islands, where China has used some 2,000 acres of landfill to bolster once-submerged reefs into islands.

Carter said the United States will invest in and deploy rotational American troops to the Philippines bases.

“It is important for all of the nations – China, the Philippines, Vietnam, others – not to engage in any unilateral steps of reclamation, of building, of militarization,” Secretary of State John Kerry said in February. “The fact is that there have been steps by China, by Vietnam, and by others that have unfortunately created an escalatory cycle.”

Woody Island has been under Chinese control since the 1950s, but it is also claimed by Taiwan and Vietnam. China first built a runway capable of handling various military aircraft, including advanced fighter jets, in the 1990s. It expanded the runway in 2014.

The Pentagon has confirmed smaller-scale deployments of Chinese fighters to Woody Island in the past, including in November 2015 and more recently in February.

New information obtained by Pentagon officials suggests China could be further building up its military on Woody Island.

Satellite photos taken by ImageSat International appear to show a fire control radar system present on Woody Island, which would allow China to use the surface-to-air missile systems it deployed there in February. The imagery shows the surface-to-air missile systems on the east side of the island, with several missiles in firing position.

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told reporters in February that China was “deploying necessary, limited defensive facilities on its own territory.”
 
Top