I have to lament that fact that the editorial article is such an awful read. The language is so flowery and reads like a North Korean press release.I would say if Zhang and Li weren't individually engaging in corruption (from the article it seems like they might have not), but were disagreeing with Xi on actually prosecuting corruption within the PLA, then the core fundamental problem at hand is still corruption. And the definition of a good environment/atmosphere should be one where corruption is not tolerated. We've seen Xi try to engineer an atmosphere and culture of accountability within the ranks of civilian party officials, so him engaging in the same cultural engineering in the PLA isn't out of the question.
I was hoping there would be more factual and nuanced article.
The main question is, was Zhang and Li blocking real corruption to protect their political clout or are they trying to stop a which hunt that can hurt the readiness of the PLA?
While most say it's a good thing there is no term limits for Xi, some checks and balances are still needed.
