Oh wow that's so pathetic. They forgot to change it in the text though roflmao.
Last edited:
Chengdu next gen combat aircraft (?J-36)
- Thread starter Blitzo
- Start date
The tail looks a bit more like prototype #1 instead of #2?
Most people only read the title anyway so it’s not a big deal.
Wonder if one of the editors saw the Wumaos gloating about this while skimming the thread for future content and changed the title as revenge.
AssassinsMace
Lieutenant General
Next thing you’ll hear is both appearing at Lop Nor is because they’re in competition with one another so it’s not two 6th Gen that China will have. It’s only one. Same reason why one of the comments was complaining how come the US having longer runway isn’t mentioned.
Another argument for the US to take over Bagram so the US can stop China’s 6th Gen programs because it ends there like China can’t do it anywhere else because that’s how they think it works because you know the same thing would happen where China won’t somehow be able produce nukes anywhere else also.
Another argument for the US to take over Bagram so the US can stop China’s 6th Gen programs because it ends there like China can’t do it anywhere else because that’s how they think it works because you know the same thing would happen where China won’t somehow be able produce nukes anywhere else also.
It's taken from an angle and not straight down, u can literally see the sides of the buildings lol
I don’t know how you could be sure when there are funky shadows cast over the nozzles.
Thanks, Deino. Janes...
Is the graphic wrong? (The front right socket in the first image (2 prototypes) is the same as in photo 2 (1 prototype)...
One of the reasons why half of Europe (and beyond) is asking me quite insistently to go back to doing infographics in the sector.
Janes (if you're reading this), you perfectly represent the current state of affairs...
End of OT. (Sorry, Deino).
Is the graphic wrong? (The front right socket in the first image (2 prototypes) is the same as in photo 2 (1 prototype)...
One of the reasons why half of Europe (and beyond) is asking me quite insistently to go back to doing infographics in the sector.
Janes (if you're reading this), you perfectly represent the current state of affairs...
End of OT. (Sorry, Deino).
Also, thrust vectoring "paddles"?
Deino, I think you've posted multiple times about how Janes (both their articles and infographic drawings) are poor quality and inaccurate, which I agree with.
This infographic/drawing is also poor quality. At this point I think Janes' articles and drawings are not valuable as baseline.