No strategy shows instant results in the middle of an ongoing conflict. These strikes arent meant to stop attacks overnight.I think they aree about weakening leadership, coordination, and continuity over time.You have it backwards. If you want to argue that the current round of assassinations are working, the burden of proof really is on you to demonstrate how any of these successful assassinations have contributed to reducing Iranian attacks and war fighting capabilities.
If there is no observable impact, then what does that say about the effectiveness of this strategy?
By the end of this, Iran as a state may survive, or it could fragment without the current regime. And even if a more hardline regime takes over, the question is whether it would be as effective as the current one.
A collapsed country isn’t a functional one. For all its shortcomings, the current regime has managed the country’s position despite sanctions. If things spiral, you could end up with something closer to Syria or Libya. Chaos not stability.
