2025 Israel - Iranian conflict

PLAwatcher12

New Member
Registered Member
If thats the case, then why bother adding cope cages to MBT's?. Jammers will do all the work, right?.



They haven't, though. So far only Salami has been confirmed and there are reports he was bedridden and sick, while Qa'ani is actually alive.
No matter how good jammers are they aren’t 100% effective that’s why
 

Sheleah

Junior Member
Registered Member
If iran has the magazine depth, then they can keep hitting again and again. I don't think they should stop without an explicit ceasefire agreement with Israel.


The detail would be the number of medium-range ballistic missiles at their disposal... I heard somewhere that they had about 1,500... that's not enough for three days of wave attacks.

Let's hope they have a good reserve and manage to weaken the IDF, otherwise, the Israeli response could overwhelm them.
 

Racek49

New Member
Registered Member
I think that's just an excuse to not spend more. Why is China still the second most powerful military when they can be first with their 40 trillion GDP PPP? Why not boost up their number of planes, missiles, carriers? The fact is China is showing too much restraint and will suffer for it in the future.
Weapons quickly become obsolete, especially today with such rapid development of military technology. If I arm myself massively today, I may have obsolete weapons tomorrow. Therefore, it is necessary to estimate the time of the future conflict well. It must not happen that the enemy will catch us at the moment of rearmament. This happened to the USSR at the moment of the German attack. They had a lot of aircraft, but they were obsolete and new ones had only just begun to be produced. The same goes for tanks. Such situations must be avoided by wise leadership.
By the way, 1.5% is not so little. Moreover, what is saved on rearmament can be invested in factories and research. These can then be involved in armaments at any time.
 

Botnet

Junior Member
Registered Member
Why do the attacks happen in waves? Wouldn't it be easier to overwhelm Israeli missile defense if they launched all their salvos at once?
They’re limited by the amount of launchers and TELs they have available, we know Israel has been hitting those. If you’re firing that large of a barrage you’re probably gonna need multiple waves. Secondly BDA (Battle Damage Assessment), ideally you want to assess the results of your strikes before firing another salvo so you’re not just hitting already bombed out infrastructure instead of acquiring new targets.
 

neutralobserver

Junior Member
Registered Member
What the hell is going on? Why have those idiots stopped? Keep going damn it, while you have the upper hand and the AD is depleted. Idiots, I swear. I wish I could just reach out and smack them on their heads.
It's a use it or loose it situation and stopping now would the the worst decision they could possibly take as Israel will conduct round of strikes to take out the launchers.

Meanwhile, look at the hypocrisy of IDF:

 
Top