Well Trump said Iran will never do nuclear anymore, all their bases and stuff is dead. So... if everything nuclear is gone they dont need to be on NPT and IAEA do they... Also on that note, shouldnt the sanctions be taken off too??
2025 Israel - Iranian conflict
- Thread starter Maikeru
- Start date
Between Minsk and Syria, the west has repeatdly made it abundantly clear they see all agreements as tools to regroup and restart their agression, its the nature of barbarian culture that the only language they understand is pain and that culture can never be fixed so long as they exist.
This means there wont be 2 years, there might not even be 2 weeks, the clock is already ticking to the next attack and theres zero room for complacency.
Next time Israel will focus on destroying Iran's missiles which humiliated them so much in the opening attack, they will try extra hard to infiltrate every base, try to install their guys at every level of command to sabatoge bases from the inside. They willl try to develop new tools and equipment to detect and destroy launchers faster, you can bet at this very moment Plantir is pitching some sort of AI tool that'll do so.
Iran cant count on the same strategy to work as well next time and need to immediately start preparing for those new measures, starting with full cleanse of their communications networks and install much better internal survelance technology. Fortunately Iran is friendly with the world leader in this, one country alone in the world not Israel cant effectly infiltrate, but they have to make an effort diplomatically and internally to ensure its proper installation and operation.
Bottom line is believing you have 2 years is extremly dangerous given the nature of their enemy.
We don’t know for sure, but the damage was likely only enough to seal the entrances, the mountain rock is too thick for those bunker busters to reach the core of the facility. Either way, Iran moved whatever they needed out of the facility days prior. Lots of work is needed to get the facility back up and running I’m sure, but it’ll enjoy more support with the Iranian people becoming more supportive of a nuclear program.
Iran is a much stronger and tougher fighter than those Arab states who quit at the moment of adversity. That's why Israeli tactics couldn't knock it out.Well Trump said Iran will never do nuclear anymore, all their bases and stuff is dead. So... if everything nuclear is gone they dont need to be on NPT and IAEA do they... Also on that note, shouldnt the sanctions be taken off too??
But they seriously need a revamp at the top level. Their approach is not working well and needs to change while they still can.
No no I dont mean Iran should operate on that assumption, but we can because US industry cant resupply that fast.
The outcome was it gave US an 'exit'
They told them they were coming,
48 hours before attacks, Sat image shows tons of trucks outside all facilities, then bombs didnt really penetrate that deep esp because ...
Fordow is DEEEEP, but it allowed US to say 'all nuclear stuff is dead' PEACE HAS ACHIEVED, mission accomplished.
Meanwhile they dont know where the enriched uranian went etc...
Gonna bet Trump told them no nuke test under my presidency.
Go test your Nuke post 2028.
Should be interesting to follow what Iran will do with the Time given by the cease fire and stuff.
Actually, NATO, especially US and UK can supply quite a bit. They had done so during the Gaza Genocide. Israel used up all the stockpiles on Gaza, going building by building. NATO C-130's, A-400M's, and C-17A's were doing near a dozen daily flights to Israel for more than a year. What Israel spent on Iran is probably not even 5% of that spent on Gaza.
Iran, however, should be extremely cautious about a ceasefire involving Israel because the latter has used such moments in Gaza numerous times to rearm, regroup, and restart the fighting by breaking the truce.
They could have both. Iran is much more wealthier than Pakistan who invested both in missiles and air force. Don't have to be exactly equivalent to Israel but atleast have some capable of a bit of defense or specific roles. Once upon a time, Syria ordered a small batch of the Mig-31 to use it's radar as mini-AWACS. Small, precise roles like these can change the battlefield dynamics.
Still wonder (and don't understand) why Erbil's pro-Israel area of control in Northern Iraq (Phull sappart saar) hasn't been targeted heavily by Iran, and even attacked from the land to create a small buffer zone. Erbil was the one who declared ready to "invade" Iran by land and the whole Kurdish-controlled belt in Iraq and Syria is a problem. I doubt Baghdad would have anything against Iran pounding pro-Erbil "forces". Same goes for the SDF in Syria. Should have been targeted more. I doubt Erdogan would mind that either.
I remember back in 2017 when Baghdad had to woop Erbil big time and Baghdad took back control of city of Kirkuk. I mean if Baghdad can do that within 12 days (back in 2017), Iran should have created a small buffer east of Erbil / Sulemaniyah.
I remember back in 2017 when Baghdad had to woop Erbil big time and Baghdad took back control of city of Kirkuk. I mean if Baghdad can do that within 12 days (back in 2017), Iran should have created a small buffer east of Erbil / Sulemaniyah.
Last edited:
Welll.....if they are smart they will develop it in secret, proper secret and on the day of the inauguration of the next president they do the test and show the world.
Yeah but gaza was slower, There was no real resistance/need to use big expensive interceptors, gaza cant find back, and it was spread over longer period of time, over 20? months now.
Meanwhile Cost estimates for just israel AD was $285+ million a day, combined with plane/navy, us/uk +nato support it was $1 billion a day.
Nato needs those supplies for themselves because of russia factor from their pov too. Iran depleted/damaged them more in 12 days than gaza or anyone else could in 2 years.
Also keep in mind there are rare-earth shenanigans going on too, with lesser and lesser supplies and more and more hungry mouths for it.
Oh yeah agreed, I think both sides will occasionally lob bomb/missile at each other without 'crossing' the threshold for a longer conflict these upcoming months.