Fingers crossed that the small chance pans out. A 20 year quagmire would be fantastic.
Or the US can just effectively destroy Iranian UGFs housing their nuclear and ballistic missile programs, and whatever other relevant structures, and repeat every few years as necessary.
The US may face increased Iranian resistance over time, but "mowing the grass" here and now is not an impractical approach, at least until the Iranians figure out ways to hit the American homeland in a meaningful manner.
However, the Beltway, especially with the current administration running things, isn't going to figure such scenarios into its calculus until things actually get there.
I think F-35 would be difficult to defeat for any 4th gen jet without good AWACS and ground radar. But having the ability to shoot down UK and US refueling tankers would have diminished Israeli attack capabilities significantly. I'm more surprised about the lack of MANPADS to take down Israeli drones and other slow moving air assets.
The issue might not so much be a lack of MANPADS, but making sure MANPADS manned by trained air defense soldiers are at the right place at the right time.
Chances are the places where Iran would concentrate AD assets are probably going to be struck by platforms that MANPADS will struggle to hit, while the airspace where Israeli airframes are flying low enjoy negligible AD coverage, including MANPADS.
Though as these IAF sorties against Iran continue, then sooner or later — especially if the Israelis misjudge the effects of their suppression of Iranian AD, or if the Iranians just get lucky — we'll start seeing credible reports of crewed IAF airframe losses over Iran.
Holy mother.
could be the system was hacked?
So are the Iranians firing
fewer, but
more sophisticated ballistic missiles at Israel?