Russian Su-57 Aircraft Thread (PAK-FA and IAF FGFA)

Discussion in 'World Armed Forces' started by A Bar Brother, Dec 23, 2014.

  1. Air Force Brat
    Offline

    Air Force Brat Brigadier

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    8,371
    Likes Received:
    9,836
    The F-35A is extremely agile, if you aren't able to see that in that 9G RIAT breakout turn, I can't help you, to be honest there's NEVER going to be an SU-57 inside the "kill" envelope of the F-35, the F-35 will see the SU-57 at well over 100 nautical miles, maneuver for an optimal kill shot, and do the dirty deed...

    The F-22 on the other hand is so far ahead of the Su-57 on almost every level, so the Su-57 will be like a "lightning bug" on a starry night, easy to see, and easy to shoot.....

    The F-35 is pathetic?? come on, you really ought to at least watch the RIAT video, and now we are going to have a whole summer of fun, with the F-35A!
     
    TerraN_EmpirE and Brumby like this.
  2. Gloire_bb
    Offline

    Gloire_bb Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2014
    Messages:
    671
    Likes Received:
    656
    500. No, 2500!
    Freedom powered, after all.
     
    Air Force Brat likes this.
  3. Deino
    Offline

    Deino Brigadier
    Staff Member Super Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2005
    Messages:
    9,457
    Likes Received:
    23,578

    Oh please can we stop quoting this site?

    The last time they were claiming the PLAAF WILL unveil its H-20 during the PLAAF parade next August, they "proved" with old photoshopped images, that CAC has developed a twin-seater J-20 and now this mess.
     
    TerraN_EmpirE likes this.
  4. ougoah
    Offline

    ougoah Senior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2008
    Messages:
    1,313
    Likes Received:
    1,498
    More from master manipulators and peddlers of falsities. While a purchase of finished Su-57E with IZ-30 engines would certainly be a real possibility, at the moment, PLAAF will be buying a half finished project. Only online hardcore Russian/ Orthodox right wing fanboys believe this prototype is a finished super 5th (even 6th) gen fighter, proving to be as irrational and stupid as all the chest thumpers around the world.
     
    araberuni likes this.
  5. Gloire_bb
    Offline

    Gloire_bb Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2014
    Messages:
    671
    Likes Received:
    656
    IMG_20190513_140737_146.jpg
    1. Prolonged monitoring of remote airspace; interference-protected, open and closed connection in AF and fleet comm systems
    -destruction of enemy c4 structure
    -destruction of all types of air targets in BVR and WVR combat
    -supression of area- and point defence AA defences
    -solo and coordinated strikes against various naval targets
    IMG_20190513_140732_637.jpg
    Confirmed supersonic characteristics. Match known f-22 specs at both subsonic and supersonic speeds, exceeds all 4+ fighters at supersonic speeds.
    IMG_20190513_140728_910.jpg

    Pictures first, i'll translate them a bit later.
     
    #2845 Gloire_bb, May 13, 2019
    Last edited: May 13, 2019
  6. Jura
    Offline

    Jura General

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    21,173
    Likes Received:
    26,626
    ... and say
    your source
    as you always do, right?
     
  7. TerraN_EmpirE
    Offline

    TerraN_EmpirE Tyrant King

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2005
    Messages:
    11,738
    Likes Received:
    10,130
    Yes "Sauce" Please.

    First image marked (3) is clearly regarding the sensors and data links.
    With the Ususal suspects on display. We see up top the kill potential vs Boeing E-3 Sentry hardly unexpected. E3 is a huge radar transmitter and profile return. Note no range data but that doesn't matter.
    The we get it vs 4th gen fighters with data links and missile trade off.
    But then you can see modern graphics like these doing the same for 4.5 on 4.5 gens.
    And then either a drone or conventional cruise missile. Again about the norm.
    And the. Strikes vs surface targets and naval targets. Sharing data with huge Russian radars, massive Russian AWACS and Russian battle cruisers.
    Fairly standard.
    (4)
    Then we get what seems an older power point here they still reference as T50.
    Some admission of radar returns from the inlets.
    And an attempt at comparing to F22.
    (2)
    And a bullet points display of features.
     
    anzha and Brumby like this.
  8. Gloire_bb
    Offline

    Gloire_bb Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2014
    Messages:
    671
    Likes Received:
    656
    Typically i do, if i know one/it isn't obvious. Why so agressive?
    Su-57 page on Paralay.com, in this case. Added in late 2018, so the pictures are probably much older than that.

    P.s. final part was eaten by correction timer.
     
  9. Jura
    Offline

    Jura General

    Top Poster Of Month

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2013
    Messages:
    21,173
    Likes Received:
    26,626
    url:
     
    anzha likes this.
  10. anzha
    Offline

    anzha Junior Member
    Registered Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2018
    Messages:
    257
    Likes Received:
    224
    yeah and where they got this from. :)
     
    Jura likes this.
Loading...

Share This Page