Littoral Combat Ships (LCS)

...yes they will.
well time passes quickly:

Mar 13, 2014
...
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

says
NO anti-ship missiles or VLS system
under
Surface Attack
part of the chart in the middle

So what's going to happen in this respect, installing Harpoon canisters??

May 16, 2014
I wonder if some temporary (for, let's say, 2015-7 period) long-range AShM will be installed (like two Harpoon canisters, for example) on LCS Freedom and/or Independence.
 
Again about this long stick :)

Revealed: US Navy's New Littoral Combat Ship Is Getting a Big Missile Upgrade

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
typical "feel good" article:
"Littoral combat ship USS Coronado successfully executed the first live-fire over-the-horizon missile test using a Harpoon Block IC missile, July 19, during the Navy's Rim of the Pacific exercise."
one might even think LCS's doing great:
"Navy officials told Scout Warrior that part of the rationale for the live-fire Harpoon exercise was to assess the ability of the LCS to withstand a deck-firing of the weapon. "
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Yes...it is a feel good...but the fact is, and long overdue...the LCS will get armed the way it should be and they will become effective vessels for performing the historical multi-role FFG duties.

I do not particularly like how we got there...but I am convinced now that we are going to get there and going to finally have a suitable replacement for the Perry FFGs.
 
...but I am convinced now that we are going to get there and going to finally have a suitable replacement for the Perry FFGs.
then you would probably agree with Opinion: Littoral Combat Ship Needs Full Congressional Support
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
vital to achieving the full potential capability of the littoral combatant.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
despite the generally acknowledged fact that the current Avenger-class mine countermeasures ships are
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
The Navy’s overall mine warfare capability is showing its age and the LCS mine warfare mission module represents the first and most advanced program within the acquisition system to reverse that unhealthy trend. The Navy has closely followed recent congressional guidance in that it
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
after
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Congress should in turn support the Navy and fund the LCS mine warfare module program as submitted by the Navy in the FY17 appropriation.

The
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
has seen more than its share of controversy. It has long been connected to the troublesome RMS system—
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
as RMS was responsible for only one of several elements of the LCS’ mine warfare mission. The Navy has
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
congressional direction by adopting a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to add the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Congress continued LCS procurement in FY17, but despite insisting on their inclusion in the system, they reduced funding by $24.5 million (from a total request for $56 million,) for key mine warfare module components such as the CUSV and Knifefish. In recommending the reduction, the Senate Armed Services Committee said, “FY17 is the first year for procurement of Knifefish and the unmanned Influence Sweep System in LCS mine countermeasure mission modules line item 1601, and that the system will undergo developmental test and evaluation to verify all technical requirements in FY2017. Therefore the committee recommended a reduction of $24.5 million for this program due to procurement ahead of need.”

The problem with that cut is that the Navy needs the mine warfare module, not only to complete the LCS modular concept, but also to replace a fading surface-ship mine warfare capability. Congress has demanded the Navy keep the aging Avengers in service and added specific language in the FY17 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) that states, “None of the funds authorized to be appropriated by this Act or otherwise made available for the Department of the Navy for fiscal year 2017 may be obligated or expended to retire, deactivate, decommission, to prepare to retire, deactivate, decommission, or to place in storage backup inventory or reduced operating status any MCM-1 class ship.”

Annual operating costs for the Avenger class have steadily risen from less than $8 million per ship in 1991 to more than $14 million in 2010, with a
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Those figures are not likely to improve, making it imperative that Congress fully fund LCS mine warfare capabilities as requested by the Navy.

The mine warfare mission module’s potential also goes far beyond employment on the LCS. Many of its components are
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
– or remote vehicle-based, making portions fieldable on other classes of ships and from shore bases. LCS mine warfare modules can be an organizing point for an
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
based at sea or ashore. Congress is getting more than just another LCS mission module. Its components provide an organic mine warfare capability for the Fleet rather than relegating it to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in the later stages of its service life.

Bringing the LCS mine warfare mission module is just the first step in correcting the Navy’s swiftly aging mine warfare capability. The 1970s vintage
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
need a major update on par with the Marine Corps
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to the venerable heavy-lift helicopter. The United States has been reduced to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in order to maintain the U.S. minesweeping helicopter fleet in operation. It was once assumed that the MH-60S helicopter would be the base vehicle for a number of mine warfare systems that could be deployed to the LCS. Of those, only the Airborne Mine Neutralization System (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) and the Airborne Laser Mine Detection System
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) continue as active components of the package. The Rapid Airborne Mine Clearance System (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
), the Expendable Mine Neutralization System (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) and notably the Organic Airborne Influence Sweep System (
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
) have all
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. It is imperative now to consider upgrading or replacing the MH-53E in the absence of an MH-60S-based sweep system.

The Navy’s current mine warfare platforms date from the 1970s and ’80s and are in urgent need of replacement. The proven helicopter-based minesweeping system and the components of the LCS mine warfare module represent the way forward to an expeditionary mine warfare capability. Congress has shown
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
regarding the number of recent CH-53 variant crashes. The legislature, however, criticized the Navy for not moving fast enough to bring the LCS mine countermeasures module to full capability, and then cut funding to the Navy’s efforts to achieve congressional tasking.

Congress should restore the cuts made to the LCS mine warfare module program and refrain from attacking the Navy’s efforts to bring the mission module to full operational capability. Congress, the Defense Department and the Navy also need to consider upgrading the MH-53E minesweeping helicopters in a manner similar to the Marine CH-53K, or replacing the aircraft with a new platform. It is time to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
supported by aircraft above mine-infested waters and drones within them.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Coronado get 4 Harpoons yeaah :eek:

USN installing Harpoon onto USS Coronado following latest missile test's mixed results

The US Navy (USN) is installing the Harpoon Block 1C missile onto Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) USS Coronado (LCS 4) now that the vessel has returned to Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, following the 'Rim of the Pacific' ('RIMPAC') exercise.

Coronado will be the first LCS-class ship to deploy with the Harpoon Block 1C, a Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) spokesperson told IHS Jane's on 1 August.

The missile's installation on board Coronado follows the first-ever launch of a Harpoon Block 1C missile from an Independence-class LCS on 19 July. The navy achieved mixed results from the demonstration as the missile failed to hit its target.

The demonstration did, however, show navy officials that the missile can be deployed from an LCS with no impact to the ship's structure.

"Once Coronado returns to Pearl Harbor, [it] will be outfitted with four Harpoon missiles prior to deploying to the US 7th Fleet area of responsibility," Commander Scott Larson, commanding officer of Coronado , told IHS Jane's on 29 July. Coronado returned to Pearl Harbor on 1 August.
Although the Harpoon missile failed to hit its target, currently there are no further tests planned with the missile, he noted.

"The results of the first test firing are still being analysed by the data collection team at the Pacific Missile Range Facility and Naval Surface Warfare Center, Corona Division," Cdr Larson said.
The lone Harpoon test aboard Coronado occured while the ship was participating in the five-week 'RIMPAC' exercise. 'RIMPAC' ends on 4 August.

"While initial indications point to a negative impact, the broader objectives of a Structural Test Firing were achieved," Cdr Larson said.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
US-Navy-tests-LCS-structural-integrity-on-land.jpg

caption
The Multi Compartment Surrogate (MCS) module was built to replicate Independence variant LCS standards of shipbuilding. Photo: US Navy
from inside of
US Navy tests LCS structural integrity on land
The U.S. Navy’s Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) program completed blast and fire testing of a full-scale structural assembly at the U.S. Army Aberdeen Test Center officials announced Aug. 9.

Built to replicate Independence variant LCS standards of shipbuilding, the Multi Compartment Surrogate (MCS) was used to conduct destructive tests to assess the damage tolerance of the LCS under weapon-induced blast and fire conditions.

“The MCS testing allows us to test our simulations in a real-world and safe environment,” said LCS program manager Tom Anderson. “This analysis, along with the recent successful completion of Full Ship Shock Trials, will serve to support future survivability assessments of the Independence variant.”

The blast testing included placing charges within several compartments to evaluate how the structure reacts to overpressures within the spaces. Data was collected to understand the failure threshold of blast-induced structural ruptures. Testers also created controlled fires within the MCS to gather data on the effects of fire on the aluminum structure.

The data collected during the series of tests establishes a reference benchmark against which computer simulations can be compared. The testing, which concluded June 30, is a critical piece of the Modeling and Simulation (M&S) framework used to assess overall LCS survivability in a combat environment.

Additionally, the testing is used to support the Live Fire Test and Evaluation (LFT&E) program and is part of the ongoing LFT&E Modeling and Simulation/ Survivability analysis.

Built at Austal USA, the MCS was designed to Navy specifications and transported via barge to the Aberdeen Proving Ground from Mobile, Alabama. A heavy lift trailer moved the module from the barge slip to the test range.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top