Miscellaneous News

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Chinese immigrants to the West and 2nd generation are almost entirely hanjian and should be treated the same as enemies in war.
Ok, No. Hanjian is a very strong word. It means at the very least a Chinese person who shows malice towards China; some say it even requires malicious actions to justify use of that word. It doesn't mean a Chinese person who doesn't feel a blood bond to China or who doesn't want to spend any energy supporting China. I don't know if you're Chinese or if you hang out with Chinese people but Chinese second generation in the US usually form cliques to themselves (I partook until I got too old to have friends so I spend all my time doing my own shit and hanging out with my wife) and they have a culture and that does revolve around being Chinese (sometimes just Asian though). They do have Chinese pride and they're happy to see China move forward and cheer for Chinese teams but the vast majority end it there and don't make or think of making any real contributions. Like most people on earth, they focus on their own lives with country-cheering something they do occasionally like when the Olympics are on. A real conversation I had with about 4 other Chinese guys (while drinking) was, "If there was a war between China and the US, who do you want to win?" They paused, one guy says, "I guess the US, maybe, cus I'm here and don't want it to f- me up." Then someone says, "And everywhere you go, they'll call you a Chink loser forever." And everybody went, "Yeah, that's true. Totally. China. I say China." So that ended up the group consensus... and this was over 10 years ago when the US wasn't nearly the desperate Asian-phonic clownshow it is today. Now there is a group of Chinese people who are very pro-American and anti-China but they are actually not common and usually hang out in white circles trying to not look like the loser despite obviously being the loser. I stay away from that like I avoid dogsh-t on a humid summer sidewalk.
 
Last edited:

pevade

Junior Member
Registered Member
Not enough. The Argentine military today is pretty much a shadow of its former (1982) self. Because we are talking about Islas Malvinas (Falkland Islands) that is located around 750 kilometers from mainland Argentina, let's talk about their air force and navy.

The Argentine Air Force is filled with warplanes from the Cold War-era. They only have:
1. 24x 3rd-gen fighters, 5x attack aircrafts and 8x trainer-attack aircrafts from the 1970s and 1980s,
2. 2x EW aircrafts;
3. 8x tactical airlifters;
4. 2x refueling tankers; and
5. 11x short and medium-ranged maritime patrol aircrafts.
They have no 4th-gen fighters (let alone those with AESA), no AEW&C aircraft to control and command allied units, no surveillance aircraft to conduct observation and surveillance, and no ELINT & SIGINT aircraft to conduct intelligence gathering. They also don't have enough tactical airlifters that can swiftly transport large number of troops and equipment between the mainland and Malvinas.

Similar situation can be used to describe the Argentine Navy. They only have:
1. 4x FFGs from the 1980s;
2. 9x corvettes mainly from the 1980s and 1990s;
3. 2x SSKs from the 1970s and 1980s (both are in reserve);
4. 7x OPVs; and
5. 3x amphibious support (not assault) and cargo ships only.
They have no modern FFGs (let alone DDGs) that can conduct effective surface warfare, no LPDs, LSTs and LSMs (let alone LHDs) for carrying troops in large numbers and conduct airborne beachhead assaults, no modern SSKs that have AIP/lithium-ion batteries (let alone SSNs), and no proper auxiliary vessels that can refuel and resupply warships at sea and between the mainland & Malvinas.

Last but not least, significant portions of their equipment, planes and ships are in non-operational status or reserve.

TL;DR - If Argentina and the UK clash over Malvinas again today, the odds against Argentina would be even more stacked than it was back in April-June 1982. If Buenos Aires truly wants to have any hope of reclaiming Islas Malvinas from the UK, the Argentinian military desperately requires massive upgrade, improvement and expansion from its current size and deployable firepower - TODAY.

What I believe the Argentine military truly needs (and can be purchased/obtained from China) for retaking Malvinas are:
1. DF-16s and DF-21s for land-attack and long-range anti-ship, perhaps even DF-17s;
2. YJ-83 and YJ-12 for anti-ship, perhaps even YJ-18 and YJ-21 AShMs;
3. JF-17s as strike and support element, J-10s as main aerial combat element;
4. Y-9s for troop and equipment transport;
5. KJ-200s for airspace control and command, perhaps even KJ-500s;
6. Varous types of Gaoxin aircrafts for surveillance and intelligence gathering;
7. KQ-200s for maritime patrol and ASW;
8. 054A FFGs for surface combat, perhaps even 052D DDGs;
9. 056 corvettes for ASW;
10. 039A SSKs for anti-ship;
11. 071 LPDs for amphibious assault and aerial support, perhaps even 075 LHDs;
12. 072, 073, 074 and smaller landing ships and crafts for amphibious assault; and
13. System-centric and network-centric warfare management system.

Unfortunately, Argentina doesn't have the deep enough pockets required for this kind of adventure anymore in the foreseeable future, I'm afraid.

Speaking of which, Argentina may also join forces with her LatAm neighbours for any future venture on Malvinas in order to increase her chances of success. But even so, considering the advancement in equipment and platforms that the UK could bring to bear, it is still going to be a very tough fight with remote chances of operational success.
That, and a shitton of drones.
 

9dashline

Captain
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Donald Trump says he will be arrested Tuesday​




His Truth social post

UBS is reluctantly forced to bailout Credit Suisse. This financial meltdown of banks does have more legs than I have thought. More importantly, if not a confident issue that is causing the mayhem, then there are something that we don't know about is going on.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Like I said, this is going to end up 10x worse than 2008, China wont be saving USA this time and might even do the "rug pull" at the worst possibly moment for Amerikkka

"Everything, all at once"
 

Biscuits

Colonel
Registered Member
pairing up under-performing student with better-performing student is a common practice. Specifically between different sexes is unheard of. Doing that policy in a university is ridiculously from another planet. During my time in the university, I can guarantee you that can lead Chinese students (primarily male) to a riot.

I'd say, the rumor of such pairing is just a twisted version of some innocent truth. The twisting is no better than "concentration camp in Xinjiang".
Some among China are not above manufacturing outrage to boost their reactionary or even insane talking points. Not all, or even most of the shilled shit on Asian internet comes from glowies.

Just like in any country, there are "conservatives" who like to make up moral failings so they can justify regression or use it to attack their opponents. At the same time, there are real hanjian such as that professor that told his underaged school class to go emigrate and chase foreigner pussy "to improve their genes", but like what happened during that video, almost always when these people out themselves, they immediately get canceled.

The government also makes sure to directly call them out.

So it seems unlikely that a whole university would be able to go under the radar.

Actually throughout the modern history of the PRC there were many anecdotes about foreigners committing various types of depraved sexual crimes, whether based on real cases or rumors. Sure, imported rapists and pedos exist because the police can't always catch every single dirty one among the immigrants before they make a crime. But I think a lot of it is embellishment due to xenophobia, like in other countries that experience more foreigners coming to them.
 

Sleepyjam

Junior Member
Registered Member
Well that makes zero sense, at any level.

I have yet to meet anyone from China who wants darker skin, so there is no eugenics angle to speak of as a possible motivation.

How anyone can think university students can be forced to have sex with people in China is beyond me. Especially since, rightly or wrongly, Chinese society is still very intolerant of premarital sex. With female ‘purity’ and virtue especially cherished. Any normal female Chinese university student who faced such pressure would immediately call home to complain and there would be literal riots by enraged parents and almost certainly leading to a formal police investigation and rape charges against any university staff involved.

But the real cherry on top is the multiple abortions claim. That’s like complaining about a restaurant having bad food after going back for seconds and thirds.

What is infinity more likely is that teenagers pumped full of hormones and away from home for the first time in their lives did what they were genetically programmed to do when given the chance. Got pregnant, got abortion(s) and carried on until parents found out, so blamed university rather than face up to the consequences of their own choices.
Yeah from what I can gather it was a voluntary program that both male and female students on both sides can apply and the school wasn’t forcing anyone, especially not to conduct any illegal activity. While I certainly don't support such a program it has been blown out of proportion by some people.
 
Top