Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

Overbom

Brigadier
Registered Member
Bloomberg says that the deal could happen as soon as Friday
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Japan, Netherlands to Join US in Chip Controls on China​

  • Tokyo, The Hague restrict sales of advanced machinery to China
  • Negotiations to be concluded as soon as Friday in Washington
US, Dutch and Japanese officials are set to conclude talks as soon as Friday US time on a new set of limits to what can be supplied to Chinese companies, the people said, asking not to be named because the talks are private. Negotiations were ongoing as of late Thursday in Washington. There is no plan for a public announcement of restrictions that will likely be just implemented, the people said.
The Netherlands will expand restrictions on ASML Holding NV, which will prevent it from selling at least some of its so-called deep ultraviolet lithography machines, crucial to making some types of advanced chips and without which attempts to set up production lines may be impossible. Japan will set similar limits on Nikon Corp.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
A little more on this Intel stuff from Dylan Patel. I know, but this thread is entertaining
he is right about a couple of things here. This short sighted approach by corporate America holds back R&D and advancement. The need to always maintain high margins doesn't work. Intel revenue is terrible for Q1 and so is are its capex cuts.

I've talked long and hard about how Boeing's strategy of not doing new projects and hoarding cash is going to kill them in the civil airliner industry. We will see what AMD chooses to do now. But if you are sitting somewhere in Loongson HQ, you are loving this. 3D5000 is already competitive. 3A6000 and 3D6000 later this year will be really competitive. SMIC just needs to be able to mass produce these chips.

Think about it this way, Intel revenue in China is about 25% of its overall revenue. $20 billion a year in data center and $40 billion a year in personal computing. so let's say China is buying $5 billion a year of server chips and $10 billion a year of desktop chips.

The global desktop market is about 60 million and laptop is 280 million a year?
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Based on this, Server cpu market is around 30 million a year
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

So if you are Chinese gov't and looking to replace Intel/AMD chips with domestic chips for desktop/server market, you need to make around 15 million desktop CPUs a year and 7 million server CPUs a year? And we know, there is a desktop replacement program in China right now of 50 million corporate desktops to go domestic.

We also know that Phytium sold around 2 million D2000 in 2021 and Hygon had higher revenue and Loongson had lower revenue. Hygon revenue for 2022 was over 5billion RMB. If we calculate each desktop CPU to be a little over 1000 RMB, then it's quite conceivable they are selling 4 million desktop CPUs a year. Let's say Loongson is on a 1 million a year pace by Q4 of 2022. In 2023, they should step up to 10 million desktop CPUs and 15 million by 2024. Doesn't leave any room left for Intel/AMD. And now that Loongson has an increasingly competitive server CPU also, will that also force great adoption of domestic CPUs in servers? I think so.

More thought experiment on this think 2023 is probably the first year where they have full N+1/12/14nm production lines running at SN1 at close to 35k wpm(will see if that's true). At this point, I'm not counting any SN2 capacity yet. Anything from there would be a bonus.

Let's say 280k 12/14nm and 140k N+1 wafers for the full year (likely lower than that for N+1). The 12/14nm process should be mature enough to produce anything at good yield. The N+1 process likely will have lower yield, especially for the more complex chips.

die size tend to shrink as you get to more advanced processes. But let's say for desktop CPU, die sizes are 150 to 200 mm2 on 12/14nm node and you get like 90% yield on them. on a 12-inch wafer, you can get about 300 die from that. Let's say die size is around 125 to 150 mm2 on N+1 node and you get like 75-80% yield on them. on a 12-inch wafer, you can get about 400 die from that.

So if you want to produce 10 million desktop/laptop CPU for 2023 and 80% of them are on 12/14nm process, that's around. 8 million at 300 die per wafer would be about 27k wafers. Remaining 2 million at 400 die per wafer would be 5k wafers.

Now if we move to 500+mm2 server CPUs at 12nm process like 3C5000, you can get 110 per wafer. If you want to see 1 million 3C5000 or half million 3D5000, that would be 9k wafers. If we add in Phytium and hygon, around 30k wafers in total for sever CPUs.

On top of this, let's say Huawei wants to put two die Chiplet for phone on sale and sells 5 million. That would require 10 million die which works out to be 22k wafers at around 450 die per wafer.

And then we have someone like Moore threads come in with 2 million GPUs per year at 600+ mm2, you can get 80 per wafer. That would be another 25k wafers.

I guess what this shows is that there is enough advanced wafer production in SN1 (if they get to 400k wafers a year of high yield) to fully support domestic desktop replacement program, server CPUs, desktop GPUs and cloud/server GPUs + even some mobile tablet devices. Domestic chip designers just need to make sure their chips are at satisfactory level. since I think they are finally getting there in 2023/2024 time range, I see orders shrinking for not just Intel & AMD but also Nvidia.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
d827c8d6gy1hahwvndnz4j20j00n4wjv.jpg
btw this is now going around Chinese social media and causing people to get alarmed which is also trigger articles like this
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Based on what can decipher from what people have been saying, the troubles at YMTC are real and they are suffering from not just losing access support for the American tools they bought but also losing orders like the apple one. When you ramp up production with the expectation of certain order, it stinks when the orders are not there. If we factor in the current market downturn in memory chip prices, YMTC is definitely have a hard time here.

There is definitely rumors of people leaving YMTC due to the tough circumstances. My sense is that the second fab is definitely not starting production anytime soon. But they do need to find customers to pay for first fab.

The other sentence here is too dramatic. The Chinese gov't will not let YMTC go bankrupt.
 

olalavn

Senior Member
Registered Member
View attachment 106032
btw this is now going around Chinese social media and causing people to get alarmed which is also trigger articles like this
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Based on what can decipher from what people have been saying, the troubles at YMTC are real and they are suffering from not just losing access support for the American tools they bought but also losing orders like the apple one. When you ramp up production with the expectation of certain order, it stinks when the orders are not there. If we factor in the current market downturn in memory chip prices, YMTC is definitely have a hard time here.

There is definitely rumors of people leaving YMTC due to the tough circumstances. My sense is that the second fab is definitely not starting production anytime soon. But they do need to find customers to pay for first fab.

The other sentence here is too dramatic. The Chinese gov't will not let YMTC go bankrupt.
aha, this is why SS raises prices by 10% Chinese companies agree to pay them... but this is rumors
 
Last edited:

european_guy

Junior Member
Registered Member
View attachment 106032
btw this is now going around Chinese social media and causing people to get alarmed which is also trigger articles like this
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Based on what can decipher from what people have been saying, the troubles at YMTC are real and they are suffering from not just losing access support for the American tools they bought but also losing orders like the apple one. When you ramp up production with the expectation of certain order, it stinks when the orders are not there. If we factor in the current market downturn in memory chip prices, YMTC is definitely have a hard time here.

There is definitely rumors of people leaving YMTC due to the tough circumstances. My sense is that the second fab is definitely not starting production anytime soon. But they do need to find customers to pay for first fab.

The other sentence here is too dramatic. The Chinese gov't will not let YMTC go bankrupt.

"Another industry expert, a former technician at Huawei, said YMTC was not short of lithography systems as it had bought several before the restrictions were imposed, but the challenge lies in etching tools from suppliers such as Lam Research."

So ASML banning does not seem an immediate issue for YMTC, and I guess neither for SMIC because they both knew what they had to do.

Regarding etching, AMEC will close the gap, maybe it wil take some time, but it will close the gap and will be 100% Chinese equipment. Etching is not lithography. Technology is not as complex and, very importantly, there are already well established and advanced local manufacturers.

IMHO lithography is the only real weak link, the gap for other kind of equipment will be closed before and in an easier way.
 

tphuang

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
"Another industry expert, a former technician at Huawei, said YMTC was not short of lithography systems as it had bought several before the restrictions were imposed, but the challenge lies in etching tools from suppliers such as Lam Research."

So ASML banning does not seem an immediate issue for YMTC, and I guess neither for SMIC because they both knew what they had to do.

Regarding etching, AMEC will close the gap, maybe it wil take some time, but it will close the gap and will be 100% Chinese equipment. Etching is not lithography. Technology is not as complex and, very importantly, there are already well established and advanced local manufacturers.

IMHO lithography is the only real weak link, the gap for other kind of equipment will be closed before and in an easier way.
I mean the issue for American tools is that they are not getting serviced at all. So, having stocked up more of them helps, but they can only replace the older machines that are breaking down.

As long as ASML and TEL service their products, the strategy of stocking up extra tools work. Since YMTC depends so much on Lam and KLA, not have service support for their products really hurt. As long as the Europeans & Japanese don't stop after service support, they will have no issue staying in the Chinese market. As we saw in the other chart, Chinese IC industry buys a lot from TEL. So, what the Japanese agree to is important too. I don't think we will find out for a while what these things are.

I would assume that ASML has an idea of what type of sanctions are coming and it said in the earnings call that it does not affect any change in its China revenue projection this year, which tells me 3 things
1) they will continue to service lithography machines they already delivered (so their service revenue doesn't decline)
2) they expect some kind of grace period for deliveries of DUVi machines which will last for a few months
3) and/or only the newest DUVi like 2000 to 2100i are limited and SMIC has already stocked up on enough of them

I assume that Dutch & Japanese will agree to similar level of restrictions.
 

KYli

Brigadier
I don't know what Weibo commenter is basing his fact upon. YMTC was under the radar of US congress after it has successfully become a supplier of Apple. Supplying Huawei was never mentioned as the reason why YMTC got a total ban. It is banned due to YMTC is too successful.

US congress basically doesn't give a fuck about YMTC supplying Huawei or not. If you read through the news article before the total ban, the US congress was asking the Biden administration to ban YMTC more than a year ago and shortly after Apple is attempting to use YMTC products. I don't think posting a random Weibo rumor is useful for the discussion.
 

theorlonator

Junior Member
Registered Member
I don't know what Weibo commenter is basing his fact upon. YMTC was under the radar of US congress after it has successfully become a supplier of Apple. Supplying Huawei was never mentioned as the reason why YMTC got a total ban. It is banned due to YMTC is too successful.

US congress basically doesn't give a fuck about YMTC supplying Huawei or not. If you read through the news article before the total ban, the US congress was asking the Biden administration to ban YMTC more than a year ago and shortly after Apple is attempting to use YMTC products. I don't think posting a random Weibo rumor is useful for the discussion.
Matt Pottinger wanted to screw YMTC over back in 2020.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top