Miscellaneous News

Mt1701d

Junior Member
Registered Member
In contrast to the CCP’s information warfare, U.S. efforts need not involve manufacturing disinformation or even generating much content at all.
Of course there isn’t a need for Washington to manufacture disinformation or generate content… pretty much the entire US mass media is doing that job already, whether it’s at China or their own people, and is probably doing a much better job than Washington can ever do, frankly I think even the CIA has nothing on them…
The U.S. government can help by offering grants to promising private outlets and reenergizing federally funded media such as Radio Free Asia.
He obviously hasn’t been reviewing the CIA budget lately… they have been offering grant and funding the shit out of RFA for like half a century… if it hasn’t been working then at this point it aren’t going to work… perhaps he should review the famous phrase from Albert Einstein…
 

j17wang

Senior Member
Registered Member
I said it on the Afghanistan thread but I think that China should start supporting at the UN, that the US should pay war reparations on behalf of Afghanistan.

The bridge is already burned and China isnt losing anything if it demands (rightly) that US pays money for the damage it caused to Afghanistan.

Mexico needs to be provided access to nuclear weapons ASAP. Th US is an existential threat to Mexican sovereignty.
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
I'm actually following this lawsuit; HMTX v. United States fairly closely because it's related to my job. I will say don't get your hopes up because even if the Court of International Trade agrees that the 301 tariffs violate the 1972 Trade Act or the Administrative Procedures Act, it immediately appeals to the Federal Circuit and (oh boy have fun with that appellate process)
Sure Matt. God bless America lol
 
D

Deleted member 15949

Guest
Sure Matt. God bless America lol
Siri, which court does the Court of International Trade appeal to?
Siri, what did the complaint in HMTX vs. United States use as its arguments on why List 3 and List 4 should be enjoined?
 

Bellum_Romanum

Brigadier
Registered Member
Siri, which court does the Court of International Trade appeal to?
Siri, what did the complaint in HMTX vs. United States use as its arguments on why List 3 and List 4 should be enjoined?
Lol no one is interested with your b.s. and now you're going to pretend you're a super duper lawyer too? Dang man, is there anything else you can't do? Matt you're da man.
 
D

Deleted member 15949

Guest
Lol no one is interested with your b.s. and now you're going to pretend you're a super duper lawyer too? Dang man, is there anything else you can't do? Matt you're da man.
Wow, knowing basic facts and reading a complaint makes you a super duper lawyer
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Nonsense, American hegemony is always worth defending
Then prepare to live with the fallout If you think Afghan debacle is bad. Wait what would happened if US confront China aggressively . As the article said US never has to face her peer. Fighting against Japan and Germany is child play the outcome is without doubt. But China economy is 80% of US economy and continental size country with advance manufacturing and nuclear power, fiercely nationalist. This time around the CONUS is not safe anymore unlike previous conflict.

America just like any gambler when it lose too much it will cut the lost and run, See Vietnam, Afghan, etc
 
Top