Chinese semiconductor industry

Status
Not open for further replies.

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Could they dump the excess products in China or other countries at a price that is lower than elsewhere?
Just to drive out the future competition preemptively.
No, due to ideology. They're spending all this time and effort to prevent Chinese companies from buying US semiconductors, and now they're gonna dump at less than cost? That is admission that their strategy failed.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
At least, let's say 10 big fabs, say for argument's sake. And these 10 big fabs will supply 70% or more of Chinese internal demand for chips.

I get much bigger numbers.
10 big fabs is less than 15% of Chinese demand.

---

In December 2020, global monthly capacity of semiconductors was 21 million wafers per month (200mm equivalent)

So if you wanted to add an additional 50% of current global capacity inside China, you could need the following combination:

38x Huge Fabs (120,000 wafers per month @ 300mm)
AND
131x Large Fabs (80,000 wafers per month @ 200mm)

Once domestic Chinese technology is mature, China could start mass-producing semiconductor equipment.
I imagine it would be like producing dumplings / sausages.

Due to economies of scale and lower costs, theoretically Chinese semiconductors would be the LOWEST cost in the world.

And yes, a big problem would be finding customers for this capacity.
But also ramping up expertise in operating the fabs and designing chips.

But remember that memory chips are commodities and have the biggest demand. Plus they are most cost effective at older process nodes which use DUV lithography.
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
Could they dump the excess products in China or other countries at a price that is lower than elsewhere?
Just to drive out the future competition preemptively.

They don't have a protected home market. If you dump excess chips somewhere, that eventually becomes the global price.

Also remember that for Chinese companies, security of supply is now more important than price.
Given some time, Chinese fabs should become the cheapest and best anyway.

And it will be Chinese companies that will benefit more, because foreign companies have a more difficult time working with Chinese fabs
 

Kancil

New Member
Registered Member
@ZeEa5KPul bro TSMC had made a lot of contribution to China IC development, Richard Chang the founder of SMIC is an alumni of TSMC, so is Liang Mong Song who help SMIC graduate to 14nm FINFET tech and also the mastermind behind SMIC 7NM , 5NM maybe 3NM development. Taiwan contribution are vital now we may agree to disagree but my main point is why destroy something that you owned.

Within 2025 hopefully there is NO war in the Taiwan strait, TSMC will no doubt expand its operation in China using Chinese equipment to survived, if that happen it will enhance SMEE/ CETC like they did with ASML, right now it is sounding an alarm of glut in the market. Nobody is listening cause national security is paramount. And my guess is it finally dawn on them that their future is China and having them onboard is a Big Plus.
TSM is dead meat now. The American having pressured them to set up fab in the US now is "encouraging" American companies ( Qualcom and Annapurna ) to give business to Intel. Intel will learn the secrets of TSMC process technology on American soil. The American won't trust foreign companies having control of superior semicon technology. The American is going to destroy TSMC to reduce the geopolitical risk of Taiwan being too close to China and getting eventually under Chinese control. There is no way out for the Taiwanese.
 

ansy1968

Brigadier
Registered Member
TSM is dead meat now. The American having pressured them to set up fab in the US now is "encouraging" American companies ( Qualcom and Annapurna ) to give business to Intel. Intel will learn the secrets of TSMC process technology on American soil. The American won't trust foreign companies having control of superior semicon technology. The American is going to destroy TSMC to reduce the geopolitical risk of Taiwan being too close to China and getting eventually under Chinese control. There is no way out for the Taiwanese.
@Kancil bro TSMC motto the report of my death are greatly exaggerated...hahahaha I'm wouldn't worry about TSMC cause technically they're strong and they are not stupid. Lets wait and IF by bad luck it happen as you predicted China will welcome them with open arms cause in politics and business ADDITION is better than SUBTRACTION.
 

jfcarli

Junior Member
Registered Member
TSM is dead meat now. The American having pressured them to set up fab in the US now is "encouraging" American companies ( Qualcom and Annapurna ) to give business to Intel. Intel will learn the secrets of TSMC process technology on American soil. The American won't trust foreign companies having control of superior semicon technology. The American is going to destroy TSMC to reduce the geopolitical risk of Taiwan being too close to China and getting eventually under Chinese control. There is no way out for the Taiwanese
"There is no way out for the Taiwanese"

There is! Join mainland.
 

DarkStar

Junior Member
Registered Member
We all know 2022 is the date of 14nm domestic production an acknowledgement with a warning coming From CCS INSIGHT.

Chinese Chipmakers Set to Achieve 14 nm Breakthrough in 2022​

Semiconductor manufacturing turns focus to mature silicon processes
Seven months after the US government placed restrictions on Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), China’s largest pure-play foundry, the Chinese semiconductor industry is starting to find its footing in a new global market reality.
While being effectively shut out of access to the latest semiconductor fabrication tools needed to catch up to global leaders such as TSMC, major Chinese chipmakers including SMIC have continued to develop 14 nm and 12 nm process nodes based on fin field-effect transistor (FinFET) technology, using mature deep ultraviolet lithography toolsets and processes which make up the majority of existing semiconductor production today.
SMIC sees an opportunity to focus on such mature silicon processes, which can improve production yield and therefore make a stronger impact on its bottom line. In fact, the company’s co-CEO Zhao Haijun has said that, based on positive feedback from customers about its 14 nm process capability, SMIC has decided to increase its spending by $1.1 billion to a total of $4.3 billion to meet demand for chips for communications and automotive applications. We expect China to be fully self-reliant in terms of 14 nm technology by 2022.
Elsewhere in China’s semiconductor industry, registration of new home-grown semiconductor firms has tripled since the start of 2021, according to the South China Morning Post, potentially creating a healthy home market for chip fabrication services like those of SMIC.
The Chinese semiconductor industry is largely being driven by the government, which is pushing for the country to become self-sufficient in silicon production by that year. That goal was dealt a huge setback by US sanctions curbing US technology exports to Chinese companies, but we believe that the Chinese industry is still capable of producing chipsets based on more mature process nodes.
Although leading-edge processes are used to produce sophisticated silicon for high-performance computing and artificial intelligence, global market needs for chips based on mature silicon processes remain strong. Case in point, the semiconductor shortage that’s holding back the automotive industry is mainly because of a lack of mature silicon process capacity, as many old fabs were retired early at the start of the pandemic. We believe that about half the global spending on semiconductors is on mature process chips, so China’s ability to create a vibrant and healthy semiconductor industry is still a very tangible possibility, with or without government support.
Recently, China Mobile has stepped into the industry by creating its own chipmaking business called XinSheng Tech, which will focrus on chipsets for Internet of things (IoT) devices. It plans to use its own IoT chip design to customize and enhance its existing IoT business unit, which currently has more than 850 million connections. With the world’s largest wireless operator looking to bring silicon design in-house, the future of Chinese semiconductor manufacturing is getting a big boost.
Furthermore, China’s Vice Premier Liu He has started a programme focussed on using the country’s semiconductor manufacturing resources and talent to make China a potential world leader in compound semiconductors. These are chips built with a mix of materials beyond silicon, such as silicon carbide and gallium nitride, used extensively in radio frequency components that are increasingly appearing in 5G devices. Because compound semiconductors don’t rely on the bleeding edge of chip manufacturing, the Chinese government sees them as an opportunity to become a global leader. This centralized government effort has been successful in the past and Vice Premier Liu is betting that China can pull this off with the necessary support.
The global semiconductor manufacturing industry has become split, as leading-edge process nodes grow finer and only a handful of players with enough scale can afford to invest in new process technologies that cost many billions of dollars. TSMC, Samsung and Intel are among those with enough scale to lead the charge to push Moore’s Law to the limits.
However, for foundries beyond these big-three players, interest in constantly investing in leading-edge process technology has found its limit. GlobalFoundries, the third largest pure-play foundry (Intel is still considered a captive foundry), has recently delayed investing in process nodes below 12 nm to focus on addressing the global silicon shortages. Likewise, UMC of Taiwan — the fourth largest — and SMIC see opportunities with existing process technologies, which are more in demand, creating less incentive for these foundries to keep up with the heavy capital investment needed to stay on the leading edge.
Amid the increasingly tense geopolitical trade skirmishes between the US and China, many non-market forces are introduced in what would otherwise be governed by the free market. However, the political realities are inescapable and the latest trade actions have forced China’s hand in its quest for semiconductor independence. But as with all business challenges, there’s a silver lining in this cloudy picture. China’s pursuit of semiconductor self-sufficiency continues as it turns its focus to building a stable, vibrant and healthy silicon ecosystem, capable of sustaining an industry dominated by international rivals.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Written by:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Posted on 06/08/2021
When that happens and when 7nm in China start production, SMIC should invite Donald trump over for the ribbon cutting ceremony
 

AndrewS

Brigadier
Registered Member
I get much bigger numbers.
10 big fabs is less than 15% of Chinese demand.

---

In December 2020, global monthly capacity of semiconductors was 21 million wafers per month (200mm equivalent)

So if you wanted to add an additional 50% of current global capacity inside China, you could need the following combination:

38x Huge Fabs (120,000 wafers per month @ 300mm)
AND
131x Large Fabs (80,000 wafers per month @ 200mm)

Once domestic Chinese technology is mature, China could start mass-producing semiconductor equipment.
I imagine it would be like producing dumplings / sausages.

Due to economies of scale and lower costs, theoretically Chinese semiconductors would be the LOWEST cost in the world.

And yes, a big problem would be finding customers for this capacity.
But also ramping up expertise in operating the fabs and designing chips.

But remember that memory chips are commodities and have the biggest demand. Plus they are most cost effective at older process nodes which use DUV lithography.

Just following on from this.

Once the Chinese-developed semiconductor equipment is ready, what could the fab construction schedule look like?

Over 10 years, that would be (4 huge gigafabs + 13 large fabs) every year.
Call that the conservative estimate

---

I think this quote from SMIC is appropriate

"Semiconductors are made by Men, not Gods"
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top