Then accept my feedback/correction which is hold true without arguing with semantic.
Chinese shipbuilding industry
- Thread starter tphuang
- Start date
Then accept my feedback/correction which is hold true without arguing with semantic.
It is continuation from here:
Chinese semiconductor industry
@ansy1968 Wouldn't be nice if China were able to catch up to 90nm in 2005 and 28nm in 2015? What do you think of this? Smee 28nm won't be able to do 14nm with multipattern and 5 units plan to deliver in 2022, 10 units in 2023. Each 28nm unit cost about 300million yuan In 2024 , 14nm...
www.sinodefenceforum.com
broadsword
Brigadier
I was not trying to reason with you about technology.
It is your attitude.
When somebody corrects me with the right information, I simply give a like/upvote to his post. And move on.
I didn't give wrong information, as I told you Korea is still strong in commercial shipbuilding technology and sales and it is correct, as proven by Korea's surpassing China in Q1 2021 (not the whole 2021), somebody else already confirm this above.
It is just your effort to drag me into semantic debate, because you can't accept that you have missunderstood my point
broadsword
Brigadier
Where did I say you gave wrong information. But I gave up up-to-date information.
You are the one dragging me into a semantic debate. I never corrected you on Korea's technology, but you kept countering with how advanced they are, as if I did not know. Not quite honest, you.
But you didn't just gave update, but said I am making "premature statement" which is actually your missunderstanding on my statement, and you keep insisting it, although I've made clarification so many times.
You said (in post #898):
The problem is that your statement holds true for only up to March. From April, China overtook them. Another problem is saying they regain position #1, as it is premature.
Who start it? isn't it semantic debate?
Where did I keep countering you with it? or why you think so?
I just quote my whole statement, it wont be missunderstood again, and it is repeated because you are repeating saying I make premature statement.
Last edited:
broadsword
Brigadier
But you didn't just gave update, but said I am making "premature statement" which is actually your missunderstanding on my statement, and you keep insisting it, although I've made clarification so many times.
You said (in post #898):
The problem is that your statement holds true for only up to March. From April, China overtook them. Another problem is saying they regain position #1, as it is premature.
Who start it? isn't it semantic debate?
How is posting up-to-date information for the benefit of everyone semantic? If you find it semantic, you are too fluffy, but other people are entitled to know the latest situation.
Then please stop repeating saying I make "premature statement" .. if your intention is only to give a valuable update
broadsword
Brigadier
Then please stop repeating saying I make "premature statement" .. if your intention is only to give a valuable update
You still have no clue why? You were saying they regain #1. Well, what happened the next month?
My friend, the year is not out yet. If at the end of Dec, Korea wins more orders only then you can say they regain. Otherwise, it could be premature.
From yesterday you keep insisting on correcting me regarding the Korean surpassing China on sales, on and on.
Chinese semiconductor industry
Of course the shipbuilding is not only about LNG carriers, but the LNG carriers is the most premium and cutting edge commercial ship product, only several country can produce it. The excellence in LNG carrier will signify the mastery/leadership of commercial shipbuilding technology. You were...
www.sinodefenceforum.com
And now you are saying that your intention is just to give a valuable update? and questioning my honesty? cmon. Isn't debate on interpretation of my statement (Korea regain #1 position in 2021 or Q1 2021) is not a semantic debate?