Things that really bother you

solarz

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Here's clip of a racist woman in Canada (sorry for any Canadians here) abusing a Chinese woman,.

For the white people here, these types of things happened more often than you think. So it is little wonder why we of the Chinese ethnicity are very defensive of anything anti-Chinese,

It's okay, she's just a moron. Instead of a minor fender-bender incident, now she's committed hit-and-run *and* hate speech. All captured on video.
 

solarz

Brigadier
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Lam says he's against the extradition bill because, among other reasons, it would affect his personal safety as an openly gay man.

For those forumites who may not be aware, homosexuals face ZERO persecution in China. The extradition bill has absolutely nothing to do with sexual orientation.

I thought I was used to MSM writing biased anti-China articles, but the perfidity of this goes beyond anything I've seen yet. The CBC used to be a respectable media outlet, but now it is publishing blatant lies.

:mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
 
Has my post been deleted? If so, why?

Some of my post, which does clearly violate any forum rules, have also been deleted over the years. It is more an act of political moderation by deletion(omission) since these post like yours does not conform to some moderator's politics.
 
Last edited:

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Some of my post, which does clearly violate any forum rules, have also been deleted over the years. It is more an act of political moderation by deletion(omission) since these post like yours does not conform to some moderator's politics.


The fact alone that you assume your post "does not conform to some moderator's politics" confirm, that your intention is to discuss politics, which is against my order.

So, either you accept this or you must look for another forum to discuss these issues.

I explained my position and I'm not willing to change this.
 
The fact alone that you assume your post "does not conform to some moderator's politics" confirm, that your intention is to discuss politics, which is against my order.

So, either you accept this or you must look for another forum to discuss these issues.

I explained my position and I'm not willing to change this.

I was neither talking about politics in my post nor was I referring to you specifically as you are not the only moderator and have no way of knowing what goes on behind the scene. In reality, I think you are fairer than most less active others and quite sympathetic with you for taking this role.

A post does not need to be political in nature to cause offense to a moderator's sensitivity or politics. Just saying,
 
Last edited:

Deino

Lieutenant General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
A certain moderator once posted an article during the intifada of a young Palestinian woman who charged at an Israeli gate outpost with nothing but a knife and was ultimately shot. He was ridiculing the Palestinian violence, showing the futility and desperation of the Palestinian and defending the heavy handed nature of the Israeli soldiers response. This was during a time when Israel was getting a lot of the criticism for their heavy handed response on occupied territories.

I responded to moderator's post that it reminds me of old movies where Chinese peasants would charge Japanese outpost using their bare hands during the Japanese occupation of China, <<Full Stop>>

Moderator's post remains and my post got deleted for posting a observation and not because my post was political but because the response does not conform to the moderator's politics.


"A certain moderator once..." come on, why should a mistake any other member once made be a justified reason for your mistake or in fact break of a rule? :mad:

Again it seems you skmpky want your own rules, you don't want to accept this rule and you want to challenge this issue.

Therefore again for the final time: I won't allow any political issues and if uou cannot accept this, you must leave. If there is however a post by any member you feel political or offensive, just report it and we decide ... but you cannot expect that I or any of us moderators read every post nor that I remember this strange post you refer to.
 
Last edited:
You ask if I find the post by a certain member offensive, Yes it is offensive that the gruesome pictures are still posted and Yes it is offensive that I am not allowed to respond with a mild comment on a political statement the "member(moderator)" himself started and feel strongly about.

What rule exactly did I break other than stating fact that moderators do delete post that does not conform to their ideology,
What's so political about stating that the incident reminds me of old movies from life in China during Japanese occupation period in response to a moderator's post. Surely most of us have seen some of Bruce Lee's movies.

If moderator does not want an observation or response, it should not have been posted. If posted with political intent with some expectation of response, why delete a comment over old movies when the content does not conform with the moderator's political narrative.

Just stating fact that some post gets deleted because it does not conform to some moderator's politics and is not an attack on any moderator nor is it political. No need to feel defensive over it.

I do not expect you to read all post but deletion of post that does not conform to moderator's ideology does happen. Not expecting you to be god-like unless you want to.
I do not make the rules and do not intend to make or skimp on any of the rules. Not even sure why you are so agitated over some factual statements and not subject to political interpretation.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

(From the Gatway Pundit)

This is what Israel deals with on a daily baisis:


Here are images of the sequence of events of an attack at a street corner, the location of an Israeli security check point.

Here a Palestinian woman approaches the checkpoint on the corner:

View attachment 21480

Here she hands her ID to the security checkpoint guard:

View attachment 21481

Here she waits as the guard checks her ID:

View attachment 21482

Here she pulls a large knife out of her purse:

View attachment 21483

Here she lunges toward the guard who falls back:

View attachment 21484

Here she lies on the sidewalk just down from the check point:

View attachment 21485

She wounded the checkpoint guard, but he was able to shoot her and critically wound her after a short struggle which came back out onto the sidewalk.

She is a 23 year-old Palestinian woman, whom the IDF now believes wanted to attack a bus stop there after she dealt with the guard. We shall never really know, but we do know she attacked the guard and tried to kill him.
 
Last edited:

Gatekeeper

Brigadier
Registered Member
You ask if I find the post by a certain member offensive, Yes it is offensive that the gruesome pictures are still posted and Yes it is offensive that I am not allowed to respond with a mild comment on a political statement the "member(moderator)" himself started and feel strongly about.

What rule exactly did I break other than stating fact that moderators do delete post that does not conform to their ideology,
What's so political about stating that the incident reminds me of old movies from life in China during Japanese occupation period in response to a moderator's post. Surely most of us have seen some of Bruce Lee's movies.

If moderator does not want an observation or response, it should not have been posted. If posted with political intent with some expectation of response, why delete a comment over old movies when the content does not conform with the moderator's political narrative.

Just stating fact that some post gets deleted because it does not conform to some moderator's politics and is not an attack on any moderator nor is it political. No need to feel defensive over it.

I do not expect you to read all post but deletion of post that does not conform to moderator's ideology does happen. Not expecting you to be god-like unless you want to.
I do not make the rules and do not intend to make or skimp on any of the rules. Not even sure why you are so agitated over some factual statements and not subject to political interpretation.



Dolcevita, we value your contribution, and I look forward to you continuing to contribute. But you need to let this go mate. You are not going to win! no matter how right you are. WE don't want to see you banned, so please let it go mate!
 
Top