Iranian Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Anlsvrthng

Captain
Registered Member
Iran now hinting at a ship swap and stating (which it didn't do earlier) that the tanker was not bound for Syria. The UK had already said it was willing to release it if assurances were received that it wasn't going to Syria.

Not sure if this is enough or if the UK will require something more than a verbal assurance. We'll see.
Absolutely rubbish.

And the pity of it is not due because of it serving any benefit of the UK population, but more likely to serve the personal carrier path of a politician .

The USA / Saudi war on Syria created the migrant crisis, and they try to make it alive by trying to make impossible for Iran to ship oil to Syria. You know, to make food, fertilisers and so on.

In good case all this story happened because the UK / USA foreign politics is serving the Saudis, in worst case because it is serving a short term move of a carrier politician .

Shameful.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
Iran now hinting at a ship swap and stating (which it didn't do earlier) that the tanker was not bound for Syria. The UK had already said it was willing to release it if assurances were received that it wasn't going to Syria.

Not sure if this is enough or if the UK will require something more than a verbal assurance. We'll see.

You have your sequence of events mixed up. Iran said on July 7th that the tanker was not Syria-bound. On July 19th, they seized the Stena Imperio.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


JULY 7, 2019 / 6:17 AM / 17 DAYS AGO
Iranian tanker wasn't headed to Syria: Iran deputy foreign minister
 

Hendrik_2000

Lieutenant General
Via Icloo the usual watcher is now being watch

Rare release of China's satellite photo of US airbases in middle east, possibly related to heightened tensions between US and Iran.

cs1-jpg.569522
cs2-jpg.569523
cs3-jpg.569524
cs4-jpg.569525
cs5-jpg.569526
 
Via Icloo the usual watcher is now being watch

Rare release of China's satellite photo of US airbases in middle east, possibly related to heightened tensions between US and Iran.

cs1-jpg.569522
cs2-jpg.569523
cs3-jpg.569524
cs4-jpg.569525
cs5-jpg.569526
Hendrik... what base is this please?

at first glance looks like Al-Dhafra down in Emirates, but I might be wrong
 
now
Military Assets Will Escort US Ships in Gulf If Needed, New SecDef Says
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Just hours after being sworn in, newly minted Defense Secretary Mark Esper addressed heightening military tensions with Iran, raising the possibility that U.S. military assets may be called upon to escort civilian vessels through the region for safety.

Esper, who became defense secretary
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, told reporters at the Pentagon on Wednesday that his priorities regarding the newly named "Operation Sentinel," the deployment of military assets off the coast of Iran and elsewhere in the region, are twofold. The Pentagon, he said, wants to maintain freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman; and deter "provocative" actions from Iran.

And, he added, military escorts of civilian ships will take place if conditions demand it.

"You see it happening already: The Brits are trying to escort their ships, and we will escort our ships to the degree that the risks demand it," Esper said.

He declined to narrow down what military assets might be tasked as escorts or what an escort might look like if employed.

"We maintain constant surveillance in the Gulf both by air and by sea. As ... I understand it, as you move through different parts of the strait and up into either ends of it, the threat changes, given proximity, locations of [Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps] capabilities. That's just one example of the assessments you have to make as you navigate the strait," Esper said. " ... To the degree that United States vessels need an escort, we'll be there; we'll be available to them."

The U.S. military has a history of escorting civilian vessels through waters off the coast of Iran at times of provocation and tension. In 2015, then-Defense Secretary Ash Carter
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
for all U.S.-flagged ships after the IRGC briefly seized control of the Marshall Islands-flagged container ship Maersk Tigris and harassed another commercial vessel.

In 1987, amid Iranian tensions and hostility, the U.S.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
to provide sea and air protection for any commercial assets transiting through the gulf.

Currently, the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
's Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group and Boxer Amphibious Ready Group are operating in the region.

Esper said he plans to visit U.S. Central Command next week to further discuss Operation Sentinel and topics including the prospect of deploying military escorts.

"To the degree that circumstances warrant, that we think that maybe a U.S. ship may be under some sort of threat, being stopped or being seized, we would want to make sure we have the capacity to make sure that doesn't happen," he said. "In some cases, that may be strictly an overhead capability; it may mean a U.S. naval warship is in proximity. I don't necessarily mean that every U.S.-flagged ship going through the strait has a destroyer right behind it."

Esper said he wants to avoid entering a "tit-for-tat" conflict with Iran similar to that between Iran and the United Kingdom. Earlier this month, the U.K. seized an Iranian tanker, and Iran responded by seizing a British-flagged one.

"We don't get into those situations where there's a provocation, where there's a seizure of a ship or something like that," he said. "We're trying to de-escalate and, at the same time, message to them that without precondition, any time, any place, we're willing to meet with them and enter into a negotiation."
 
interestingly,
Esper: U.S. Will Provide Intel to Allies to Keep Middle East Merchant Ships Safe, Not Warship Escorts
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

American forces are willing to provide allies with intelligence on potential maritime threats in the Middle East, but countries will need to bring their own escorts, defense officials told USNI News on Wednesday.

Operation Sentinel is the emerging U.S. Central Command plan to keep merchant traffic in the Middle East moving and safe amidst the ongoing disputes between Washington and Europe and Iran, Secretary of Defense Mark Esper told reporters on Wednesday.

“The key issues are two-fold: one is maintaining freedom of navigation in the Strait [of Hormuz], the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. The second is deterring provocative action from Iran,” he said Wednesday morning after being sworn in as SECDEF on Tuesday evening.

CENTCOM is working through a planning process with unspecified partners and allies to outline a construct for Operation Sentinel – not to be confused with the ongoing NATO mission in Afghanistan, Operation Freedom’s Sentinel – by the end of the month.

While plans are still being developed, the idea that CENTCOM will collect and distribute information related to the Middle East threat picture from the Bab el-Mandeb entrance into the Gulf of Aden, through the Arabian Sea, up into the Gulf of Oman and through the Strait of Hormuz into the Persian Gulf.

While the U.S. will share the information with members of the group, American Navy ships will not be escorting international maritime shipping, two defense officials told USNI News on Wednesday.

“Most countries who transit the strait have an interest in this and should want to provide forces to ensure navigation of the strait, freedom of the seas and deter provocative behavior. It’s all complementary, it all works,” Esper said.
“The Brits are trying to escort their ships. We’re escorting our ships to the degree that the risk demands it. I assume that other countries will escort their ships.”

Last week, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy seized two U.K.-flagged tankers in the vicinity of the Strait of Hormuz, and IRGCN forces are still holding the ships. Earlier this month, U.K. officials had seized an Iranian tanker near Gibraltar.

On Monday, U.K. foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt said London would be joining a separate European maritime security group to secure ships from Iranian harassment, according to a report in Jane’s.

The move to not joint the U.S. is a reflection of U.K. and Europe not wanting to be associated with the White House’s ongoing “maximum pressure” campaign of economic sanctions on Tehran and an expression of the ongoing commitment to the Iran nuclear deal the U.S. left, the Jane’s report concluded. The U.K. is preparing to send a warship to the region to join a Royal Navy frigate already in theater.

When asked about London’s decision, Esper said all groups would likely be working together.

“Whether we do that as one big group or as sub-groups, as long as it complements one another – clearly there will be coordination between us all – CENTCOM will be the coordinating authority,” he said.

In terms of U.S. presence in the region, Esper said forces in the Middle East would maintain a presence around potential danger areas but stopped short of saying it would escort all American ships to prevent their seizure by the IRGCN.

“We would want to make sure we have the capacity to make sure that doesn’t happen. And in some cases that may be strictly an overhead capability. It may mean that there is a U.S. naval warship within proximity to deter that,” Esper said.
“I don’t necessarily mean that every U.S.-flagged ship going through the strait has a destroyer right behind it.”

The last time U.S. vessels were escorted by warships was for a few days following the 2015 seizure of the Marshall Island-flagged ship M/V Maersk Tigris.

A collection of U.S. warships escorted American merchant traffic in and out of the Persian Gulf for a few days
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
.
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
interestingly,
Esper: U.S. Will Provide Intel to Allies to Keep Middle East Merchant Ships Safe, Not Warship Escorts
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

They don't need any of that crap. Iran has never instigated anything; just don't pirate Iranian ships and Iran will never target yours! All this is superfluous given that no country in their right mind would want to duplicate the UK error after seeing the mess it became.
 
Top