What the Heck?! Thread (Closed)

Status
Not open for further replies.
LOL! then you may try this one:
Experts Urge Waiver for Mattis as Check on Trump Presidency

source is DefenseNews
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

The cooling off period is there for good reason. Making exceptions is tantamount to breaking these checks and balances built into US governance infrastructure, the making of many a third world dictatorship/authoritarian government. Similarly the despicable move reducing the power of the governor's office in North Carolina by Republicans after they lost the office's election is politicized corruption of governance infrastructure and an unmistakable move towards a one party system.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
...

Wasn't there a movie about this? I think Sam Jackson was in it.
several years ago I visited a museum of torture in a nearby town, not a commercial place ... in the basement where people (including "witches" at times) had been tortured for about three hundred years ... I knew what it would be about, but still I almost fainted when after I had left (one of the problems was I was alone inside)
kwaigonegin come here and we go there :)
 

kwaigonegin

Colonel
several years ago I visited a museum of torture in a nearby town, not a commercial place ... in the basement where people (including "witches" at times) had been tortured for about three hundred years ... I knew what it would be about, but still I almost fainted when after I had left (one of the problems was I was alone inside)
kwaigonegin come here and we go there :)
Praque is still on my bucket list but the exchange rate favors the euro. I'll be really poor there lol.
 
Dec 3, 2016
...
Once In Intelligence, Always In Intelligence
I guess:
96330_900.jpg

(if you want, search google with
mike+flynn+in+moscow+picture
and you may find for example
Michael Flynn & Russia: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


...
now "Incoming National Security Advisor
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
issued a ringing endorsement today of American exceptionalism and declared, “we have always been the indispensable nation and we always will be.” ..." wow
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Incoming National Security Advisor
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
issued a ringing endorsement today of American exceptionalism and declared, “we have always been the indispensable nation and we always will be.”

Flynn also appeared to hint at plans, supported by most GOP defense lawmakers, to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Without providing any details, Flynn said he is “absolutely committed to carrying out necessary reforms carried out by previous administrations.”

He spoke after
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, the outgoing NSA, defended the current size of the NSC staff. After saying she was “struck” by how much the staff had grown between her two stints on the NSC, Rice noted the administration had cut staff by 15 percent. And she noted that 90 percent of the staff are “career national security professionals,” rather than political appointees.

Rice also argued that size was not the primary issue. Instead, she said, the role of the NSC is what matters, and “every president will decide that for himself, or herself.”

As Breaking D readers know,
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
support whacking the staff from its current level of around 375 close to the historic average of 40 to 60. A
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, saying that the NSC staff had usurped the role of Cabinet agencies and forced decision-makers to spend enormous amounts of time serving NSC demands for information.

Flynn offered an intriguing outline of what the NSC will do under President Trump. The NSC will serve four functions, ones that sound as if they will hew much more closely to the 1947 law that established the council. It will:
  • Advise the president on national security issues;
  • Formulate policy;
  • Monitor how policy is carried out;
  • Prepare the president to cope with future threats
Flynn also made an intriguing remark about Trump, saying part of his job will be “we need to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on both sides of the aisle (emphasis added) despite the difficulties we will face.”

Overall, though, the tenor of today’s remarks at the remarkable event at the U.S Institute for Peace, “
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
,” was hopeful. Flynn and Rice delivered a pair of speeches that appeared to leave the audience heartened by the prospect of a rational and orderly
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in the national security realm.

Rice said the “handoff continues as I speak” and offered praise for the Trump national security team, saying they had had “constructive meetings with Gen. Flynn and his staff. I will say I’m very proud of the professional manner in which we have conducted this transition.”

While most of Rice’s speech was a predictable, though well written and delivered, defense of the Obama Administration’s foreign policy and national security achievements, it was also marked by a touching mention of her past. Her grandfather “was a janitor who emigrated from Jamaica in 1912 with my grandmother, who was a maid and a seamstress. Standing here as the national security advisor to the president of the United States, I’m filled with gratitude for this country and the opportunities afforded me and so many others.”

Her finishing line helped bring the jaded group of national security professionals to its feet for a 43-second standing ovation. She said she hoped America will remain a strong and secure country, a “beacon of hope for all the world.”

Flynn put a somewhat different spin on that sentiment in his speech, noting that, “like it or not, the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
source is BreakingDefense
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
To be honest, I'm glad Japan acts the way it acts. If it were to truly shed its past like Germany, it could become a much more influential and competitive country, especially in Asia. There is still stigma, in China, Korea and the South East, that you should avoid doing business with the Japanese or at give them a sour deal at the end because of history. Cooperation with the Japanese is seen as a shame and usually, anyone who does buy Japanese goods admits its because they were just so tempted by its cute culture though they know they did something morally unscrupulous. A Japan that walks out from its past shadows can shed (much of) this stigma and form a much stronger partner for the US, as it can cooperate without much friction with Korea. So I really do prefer for Japan to continue actively dragging itself through the dirt clinging to a past that sabotages its own present and future.

I also believe that they reason they cling so stubbornly to this past even though it is clearly disadvantageous to do so is because WWII was a time that represented Japan's peak. It was a time when it could stand face to face and trade shot with shot against its current liege and master, which is now taller sitting down than Japan standing up. That is why they prefer to romanticize about this past time period rather than look to a much bleaker present and future.

Maybe that's how a particular faction of Japan's elite feels, such as Abe's ilk who have direct ties to architects of and key participants in Imperial Japanese aggression. Most Japanese do not feel that way. China, South Korea, and other victimized countries should offer clear goals for Japan to meet regarding owning up to its past aggression so everyone can move forward with friendlier relations in mind. Dragging things out has its limits and the potential negative consequences for everyone are significant.

It is important to remember that Japan was faced with the same existential threat as other Asian countries and peoples in the form of Western invasion and colonialism. Japan deserves credit for succeeding in making painful reforms to modernize and stand up for itself, its mistake was in also adopting the colonizer practice with its inherent aggression, prejudice, and oppression against others. As the junior newcomer and sole non-European society among the powers that be facing the tides of that era Japan was in a precarious position even after modernizing and unfortunately chose to turn on those who faced the same fate it had just saved itself from.

Current world developments suggest that the international system is continuing, with significant resistance, to emerge from the shadow of the colonial era. Japan has not been able to fully engage with this process because it is both a willing participant in and subject to imposed ingrained colonial era practices. As China becomes more of a powerful driver rather than just a factor in the international system’s development beyond colonial era practices, and being the most powerful victim of the maximum magnitude of Imperial Japanese aggression, it should set an example by offering a vision for itself and Japan to realize that fully recognizes that period in history for posterity and empowers the two to move forward to friendlier relations and more fully engaging in the international system's changes.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
Maybe that's how a particular faction of Japan's elite feels, such as Abe's ilk who have direct ties to architects of and key participants in Imperial Japanese aggression. Most Japanese do not feel that way. China, South Korea, and other victimized countries should offer clear goals for Japan to meet regarding owning up to its past aggression so everyone can move forward with friendlier relations in mind. Dragging things out has its limits and the potential negative consequences for everyone are significant.

It is important to remember that Japan was faced with the same existential threat as other Asian countries and peoples in the form of Western invasion and colonialism. Japan deserves credit for succeeding in making painful reforms to modernize and stand up for itself, its mistake was in also adopting the colonizer practice with its inherent aggression, prejudice, and oppression against others. As the junior newcomer and sole non-European society among the powers that be facing the tides of that era Japan was in a precarious position even after modernizing and unfortunately chose to turn on those who faced the same fate it had just saved itself from.

Current world developments suggest that the international system is continuing, with significant resistance, to emerge from the shadow of the colonial era. Japan has not been able to fully engage with this process because it is both a willing participant in and subject to imposed ingrained colonial era practices. As China becomes more of a powerful driver rather than just a factor in the international system’s development beyond colonial era practices, and being the most powerful victim of the maximum magnitude of Imperial Japanese aggression, it should set an example by offering a vision for itself and Japan to realize that fully recognizes that period in history for posterity and empowers the two to move forward to friendlier relations and more fully engaging in the international system's changes.
No objection to anything you said here.

But my take is rather bleak (or realistic IMO). That is NO ONE will sincerely regret and amend their wrong past without a total defeat and INITIAL forced/imposed admission of their wrong past. I admire the often talked about German sincerity compared to Japan. BUT only to a point. Without occupation by victim countries such as France and Soviet Union, I expect Germany would not have been much better than Japan. Germany could have been easily and happily be a good buddy with US while stubbornly refusing to accept its guilt towards anyone else. The French and Soviet occupation forced Germany to face up its guilt to all victimized countries on European continent.

History can not be "what-ifed", we would never know, but I would not automatically assume something (even good ones) is a given when there is a condition that can make big differences.

What happened in the past and more importantly what is happening today will shape the future. On this account, Japan is loosing the future by its very own act. Nobody can offer anything if Japan does not want to take it. The track record of Japanese ruling class does prove that with a few exceptions (村山富市 and 河野洋平). Abe is just going further away than anyone else has.
 

manqiangrexue

Brigadier
Maybe that's how a particular faction of Japan's elite feels, such as Abe's ilk who have direct ties to architects of and key participants in Imperial Japanese aggression. Most Japanese do not feel that way. China, South Korea, and other victimized countries should offer clear goals for Japan to meet regarding owning up to its past aggression so everyone can move forward with friendlier relations in mind. Dragging things out has its limits and the potential negative consequences for everyone are significant.

It is important to remember that Japan was faced with the same existential threat as other Asian countries and peoples in the form of Western invasion and colonialism. Japan deserves credit for succeeding in making painful reforms to modernize and stand up for itself, its mistake was in also adopting the colonizer practice with its inherent aggression, prejudice, and oppression against others. As the junior newcomer and sole non-European society among the powers that be facing the tides of that era Japan was in a precarious position even after modernizing and unfortunately chose to turn on those who faced the same fate it had just saved itself from.

Current world developments suggest that the international system is continuing, with significant resistance, to emerge from the shadow of the colonial era. Japan has not been able to fully engage with this process because it is both a willing participant in and subject to imposed ingrained colonial era practices. As China becomes more of a powerful driver rather than just a factor in the international system’s development beyond colonial era practices, and being the most powerful victim of the maximum magnitude of Imperial Japanese aggression, it should set an example by offering a vision for itself and Japan to realize that fully recognizes that period in history for posterity and empowers the two to move forward to friendlier relations and more fully engaging in the international system's changes.

First of all, China's goals for Japan are very clear. 1. Own up to what was done in WWII instead of changing textbooks to hide them (only from Japan's own children, making them seem ignorant in the world). 2. Stop returning to a shrine to honor war criminals; if you can't stop returning to a shrine that you say honors all of Japan's warriors through time, then take the war criminals out. It's really not that complicated.

Secondly, how is it China's responsibility to set an example for Japan to welcome friendlier relations in the future??? That is the responsibility of the victim??? To the criminal that doesn't even recognize his crimes?? I understand what you are saying; China could be the bigger man because it is so powerful and Japan is in such a sullen state, but never is it the responsibility of the victim to try to bury the hatchet and seek friendly relations with the perpetrator, who won't even admit to a crime.

Japan, at this point, is too deep into a corner to come out and move freely.

1. It feels so vulnerable and threatened by China because of China's rising strength and Japan's relative and increasing weakness. It is threatened by China's existence and it is haunted by its own past. "Who wouldn't want to destroy me after what I'd done to them? I can only escape this by keeping them weak." The only way for China to mitigate this would be to become weaker, which, I think we all know, is a thought for laughing only.

2. Japan is so covered in shame from what had happened since WWII. All those war crimes, still defeated. Was the shining star of Asia, head and shoulders above everyone else, now, a declining economy that grovels for protection from the neighbor it looked down upon the most. From world power to militarily colonized. The, from rising economy to gutted by its own master. Japan's just in such a bad place, it doesn't want to open up. Imagine if you got mugged, raped by another man, your car stolen, fired from your job, parents died in building crash, dumped by your wife, who took your house and kids, all in the last 3 days. You'd probably just want to lie in bed staring at the ceiling rather than go out there fixing things.

3. It is militarily colonized by the US. The US doesn't want war between China and Japan but certainly doesn't want to see them hugging like buddies either, because that would de-legitimize America's military presence in Japan. Everyone says it's to defend against North Korea, but we all know, the second China's military is deemed no longer a threat to Japan, that's when every Japanese wants the US military out, not that they could manage it...
 
Last edited:

B.I.B.

Captain
No objection to anything you said here.

But my take is rather bleak (or realistic IMO). That is NO ONE will sincerely regret and amend their wrong past without a total defeat and INITIAL forced/imposed admission of their wrong past. I admire the often talked about German sincerity compared to Japan. BUT only to a point. Without occupation by victim countries such as France and Soviet Union, I expect Germany would not have been much better than Japan. Germany could have been easily and happily be a good buddy with US while stubbornly refusing to accept its guilt towards anyone else. The French and Soviet occupation forced Germany to face up its guilt to all victimized countries on European continent.

History can not be "what-ifed", we would never know, but I would not automatically assume something (even good ones) is a given when there is a condition that can make big differences.

What happened in the past and more importantly what is happening today will shape the future. On this account, Japan is loosing the future by its very own act. Nobody can offer anything if Japan does not want to take it. The track record of Japanese ruling class does prove that with a few exceptions (村山富市 and 河野洋平). Abe is just going further away than anyone else has.

IMO a grudgingly given apology, is no apology at all.

Only a handful of Germans engaged in Himmlers genocidal policies were ever punished.
 

taxiya

Brigadier
Registered Member
IMO a grudgingly given apology, is no apology at all.

Only a handful of Germans engaged in Himmlers genocidal policies were ever punished.

Agreed in principle. But to clarify, in case of Germany, I can't say the apology is not sincere just because it was forced upon them at the beginning. They still could be sincere by plain logic, and by my own observation they really are sincere. I have a Germany friend, she told me about organized school visit to the death camps. She also took me to the Holocaust monument in Berlin at her initiation (I avoided the whole WWII thing to not to embarrass her). I can not say she represent all Germans, but she is the only German I know in person and she represents that 100% Germans in my knowledge.

When I said the force is needed, I meant it is a must to start the whole realization and taking on guilt process, the force is not necessary for ever. People can change, but force is needed to stop them continuing the wrong, to face the facts, after those are forced on them, people with humanity conscience still inside them will be able to move on their own. To prove that they have departed from their past, the force need to be removed and see the doing afterwards.

All I was saying is that, both countries needed that hard start to cut off their past, Germany got it (thanks to French and Soviet) but Japan did not (thanks to the sole US occupation). So now we are looking at two opposite examples.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top