US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Clearly the US has established its policy of more patrols in the South China Sea with US Navy vessels, from LCS to Burke destroyers, and even Tico cruisers.

The latest:

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


The Mustin is currently in Aus after her SCS patrol, the young lady who subbed in our MD class this summer, stated that her older bro loved Asian women, but that he was "looking for a blonde"? I got a real kick out of having a chick tell me that, but she was a wealth of information, and knew a great deal about the Navy as her Grandpa is Navy man, and she had gone to Hawaii for the decommissioning of they Denver.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


0000000000 Richard Dixon.jpg

US Coast Guard said:
The 13th fast response cutter, Coast Guard Cutter Richard Dixon, arrived at its home port of San Juan, Puerto Rico, June 24, 2015. The cutter is the first of six FRCs planned to be stationed in San Juan.

Richard Dixon arrived after a 1,500-nautical mile trip from Tampa, Florida, where the cutter was commissioned June 20, 2015.

Representatives of Coast Guard Project Resident Office Lockport, Bollinger Shipyards and Kemplon Engineering were present to greet the crew and begin warranty support of the ship. The PRO has prepared more than 3,000 parts and equipment items to support the six FRCs to be stationed in San Juan. Upon Richard Dixon’s arrival, they immediately began the work to support the cutter and the five other incoming FRCs.

“We are excited to welcome Coast Guard Cutter Richard Dixon, Sector San Juan's first fast response cutter, to the island of Puerto Rico. The homeporting of fast response cutters at Sector San Juan will significantly enhance our ability to counter the evolving safety, security and law enforcement threats in our region, as the cutters’ new communications and operational capabilities are brought to bear,” said Capt. Robert Warren, commanding officer of Sector San Juan. “The move also highlights the Coast Guard’s unwavering commitment to the citizens of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands and our continued investment and contribution to the safety and security of the Eastern Caribbean.”

The Coast Guard is acquiring 58 FRCs to patrol the near-offshore environment and replace the 110-foot Island-class patrol cutters, which entered service in the 1980s. Compared to the Island-class cutters, the FRCs feature more advanced command and control equipment, improved seakeeping and habitability, and faster cutter boat deployment via stern launch.

The FRCs are 154 feet long, have a range of 2,950 miles and a maximum speed of more than 28 knots.

There are currently 32 FRCs under contract. The 14th FRC and second for San Juan, Heriberto Hernandez, is scheduled for delivery later this summer.

The Coast Guard is rapidly moving forward with the Fast Response cutter program, which is the Sentinel Class. 14 is almost ready, 15 is under construction. They will build 58 of them altogether.

The first six are station in Miami, Fl. the second six are serving in Key West, FL. These next six will be in San Juan.

They are being deployed in squadrons of six.
 

Air Force Brat

Brigadier
Super Moderator
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!





The Coast Guard is rapidly moving forward with the Fast Response cutter program, which is the Sentinel Class. 14 is almost ready, 15 is under construction. They will build 58 of them altogether.

The first six are station in Miami, Fl. the second six are serving in Key West, FL. These next six will be in San Juan.

They are being deployed in squadrons of six.
Kind of like the WWII PT boats, being operated in squadrons I mean.
 
the newest SDB II article ... if true, the price of a bomb from "the entire SDB II production run" would be 2792000/17000 = $162k ... for a two-hundred pounds, half of it electronics :)
Air Force Buys First 144 Small Diameter Bombs
The Air Force has moved into production of its Small Diameter Bomb II that can pinpoint targets from long distances, destroy stationary or moving targets and change course in flight using a two-way data link, service officials said.

“Using its dual-band weapon data link, it can change targets in flight and can be controlled by a third party,” Col. Kevin Hickman, SDB II Program Manager, told Military.com in a written statement.

The Air Force awarded a $30.9 million deal this past June to Raytheon for an initial increment of 144 bombs.

The potential value of the entire SDB II production run is expected to be $2.792 billion for 17,000 SDB II weapons – 12,000 for the Air Force and 5,000 for the Navy, Air Force officials told Military.com

“These weapons are expected to be procured through 2025,” Air Force spokesman Ed Gulick said in a written statement.

The move toward formal production and operational status for the weapon comes on the heels of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Several months ago, an Air Force F-15 Eagle destroyed a moving surrogate-model T-72 tank during a live-fire test of the new Small Diameter Bomb II at White Sands Missile Range, N.M., service leaders said.

The Small Diameter Bomb II represents a technological departure from previously fielded precision-guided air-dropped weapons because of its ability to track and hit moving targets from long distances.

Most of the testing of the SBD II thus far has been on an Air Force
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
, however, the weapon has also been fitted and tested on the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
. Engineers are also working on plans to integrate the bomb onto the
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
and
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
as well, Raytheon officials said.

GPS and laser-guided weapons such as
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
s have been around for decades, however, they have primarily been designed for use against fixed or stationary targets.

A key part of the SDB II is a technology called a “tri-mode” seeker — a guidance system which can direct the weapon using millimeter wave radar, uncooled imaging infrared guidance and semi-active laser technology.

The seeker allows the weapon to attack stationary and moving targets at distances greater than 40 nautical miles on land and at sea, Raytheon officials said.

A tri-mode seeker provides a range of guidance and targeting options typically not used together in one system. Millimeter wave radar gives the weapon an ability to navigate through adverse weather, conditions in which other guidance systems might encounter problems reaching or pinpointing targets.

Imagining infrared guidance allows the weapon to track and hone in on heat signatures such as the temperature of an enemy vehicle. With semi-active laser technology, the weapon can be guided to an exact point using a laser designator or laser illuminator coming from the air or the ground.

Also, the SBD II brings a new ability to track targets in flight through use of a two-way Link 16 and UHF data link, Raytheon officials said.

The SBD II is engineered to weigh only 208 pounds, a lighter weight than most other air dropped bombs, so that eight of them can fit on the inside of an F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, Raytheon officials explained.

If weapons are kept in an internal weapons bay and not rested on an external weapons pod, then an aircraft can succeed in retaining its stealth properties because the shapes or contours of the weapons will not be visible to enemy radar.

Plasma Jets
About 105 pound of the SDB II is an explosive warhead which encompasses a “blast-frag” capability and a “plasma-jet” technology designed to pierce enemy armor, a Raytheon official explained.

The SDB II also has the ability to classify targets, meaning it could for example be programmed to hit only tanks in a convoy as opposed to other moving vehicles. The weapon can classify tanks, boats or wheeled targets, a Raytheon official added.

Prior to the award of this contract, the Pentagon and Raytheon have already invested more than $700 million into SBD II development, Raytheon officials said.
source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

Blackstone

Brigadier
Not sure what this will mean
or more misinformation....
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Pentagon Reconsidering Total F-35 Buy, Dunford Says
It makes sense to regularly review defense procurements to suit national defense, but it's not enough for the Pentagon to do it, there must be reforms in the weakest leg of defense spending: the US Congress.

Currently, Congressional spending is based less on coherent defense strategy and more on how many Congressional Districts weapon systems are manufactured or based. That has produced mismatches between what the Pentagon says it needs to carry out missions and what Congress mandates on budgets. There are cases where the Pentagon said it doesn't need specific weapon systems and could save cost by cutting them, but Congress mandates them back into defense budgets anyway, not because the weapons are needed, but because they were manufactured in many States and Congressional Districts.

The mismatch was manageable when US was sole Hyperpower, with only 3rd World opponents to police, but that is no longer the case. Today, relations with China is increasingly adversarial and, Russia is actively invading another sovereign state. Conflicts are increasing in all the hot spots of the world, and militant Islam is attempting to turn the world clock back 1400 years. The planet is what General Dempsey called "perpetual war," and US doesn't have a global strategy to deal with it.

Pentagon reconsidering F-35 buys is a step in the right direction, but it isn't enough by itself. President Obama must show some leadership and drive Congress to review its own defense procurement and oversight process, because what we got today might not meet the challenges of tomorrow.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
I doubt you will see much of a change here.. Each of the three Us Services will internally look it over, The Marines will finish First and come back to F35B, Compared to there Legacy harrier and Hornets it's a step up.
The Air force may make a few changes but unless we see a major push to reopen the Raptor line. I don't see a Change. F16 is a fine system and no doubt will remain in service for some time but the Air Force has to move on and as there are there are few on the Alternatives list that would do better. it might push for sixth Gen a little earlier though.
The Navy is the wild card. They have a Option for F/A18E/F advance but Really they have invested so much it unlikely to change.
Also for long term, Lets be honest the key problem will change for each version.
A was tested against F16.
B has the Lift fan and thrust vectoring systems changing it's weight but also potentially changing it's maneuvering.
C has larger wings changing it's performance.

and if the DOD opens a engine replacement program or decides in the 2020's to creat a F35D, F35E, and F35F it's going to farther change. If they can cook up a Advent Engine with better thrust F35A could start turning like a F16 add in thrust vectoring and who knows.
 

navyreco

Senior Member
Got confirmation from LM this week:

Lockheed Martin Ends Collaboration with Patria on Havoc & Will Present its Own Design for ACV
Contacted by Army Recognition, a Lockheed Martin representative explained:
'"Lockheed Martin is fully committed to the United States Marine Corps. Lockheed Martin looks forward to providing an Amphibious Combat Vehicle (ACV) solution with significant growth margin for all future ACV variants. Prior to Lockheed Martin's ACV proposal submission, Lockheed Martin and Patria mutually agreed to end our exclusive association on the program. For competitive reasons, we are not disclosing information on our proposed solution at this time."

The spokesperson also said that Lockheed Martin is expecting to unveil its new solution during Modern Day Marine, a defense show held in September in Virginia.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Finally they come clean. Chances are the new offering will still be 8x8 wheeled platform question is existing? Or something new? The original Marine Personal Carrier requirements were for off the shelf, when it became Amphibious Combat Vehicle 1.0 General Dynamics moved to a more or less original vehicle based on a upgraded LAV chassis, the LAV 6.0.
 
oh ...
Screen-Shot-2015-07-09-at-3.03.22-PM.png

source is
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top