J-20... The New Generation Fighter

Status
Not open for further replies.

SinoSoldier

Colonel
Re: New Generation Fighter

... The J-13 and J-14 don't exist, there is only one stealth fighter project that we know of in China and that is the J-XX, now sometimes called the J-20.
I don't know what you mean by "we expected", because the majority of posters in this thread have only expected one stealth fighter and that's not one with a triplane configuration.

That photo (whether it's real or not) shows a tailless delta canard.

J-XX is a generic term that applies to all Chinese stealth fighter programs.

CAC submitted a design called J-13, which was turned into a multirole fighter. It uses triplane.

SAC submitted a design called J-14, which was turned into an air defense superiority fighter. It uses delta-canard configuration.
This is by far the most well-known one.

People would "expect" one stealth fighter because the J-13 hardly gets any attention

The J-14 (or as you may call the "J-XX") is not built by CAC. It is built by SAC.

J-20 is a name given by fanboys.
 

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Re: New Generation Fighter


J-XX is a generic term that applies to all Chinese stealth fighter programs.

CAC submitted a design called J-13, which was turned into a multirole fighter. It uses triplane.

SAC submitted a design called J-14, which was turned into an air defense superiority fighter. It uses delta-canard configuration.
This is by far the most well-known one.

People would "expect" one stealth fighter because the J-13 hardly gets any attention

The J-14 (or as you may call the "J-XX") is not built by CAC. It is built by SAC.

J-20 is a name given by fanboys.
... No.. It's only recently (late this year) that the J-20 designation has come to use -- most of us on this forum call it J-20 because Huitong's well known site has labelled it as such. It could be something entirely different when it all comes out but right now the J-20 label is valid.

And it was CAC that submitted the delta canard, and SAC that submitted the triplane, the latter of which was rejected by the PLAAF for the J-XX (J-XX here refers to the single Chinese 4th (5th in west) generation fighter under development as of now, which we know of).

The J-13 and J-14 are nonexistant planes. Are you getting this information from wikipedia or something?

Here's Huitong's site, at the bottom there's a rough summary of the J-XX/J-20's possible history and recent developments.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

There's also a picture of a triplane which I quote "601 Institute was working on a "tri-plane" design based on canard/conventional layout/V-shape tailfin" And 601 institute is SAC...

J-20c.jpg
 

Spoiler56

New Member
Re: New Generation Fighter

I checked Google Earth, and it is indeed located at SAC 601 Design Institute and production facilities> And using the Google ruler, I measured the odd aircraft sitting there. And it is smaller (well shorter any way) than the standard J-11.
Which would also make it smaller than the JH-7. Its apparent length is around 59.68-feet (18.19-meters) and with a wing span of 44.97-feet (13.6-meters). Also on the ramp with this odd aircraft are 5 J-8 IIs, 2 J-6, and on the south ramp can be seen 12 J-11s. This odd aircraft has no apparent horizontal tailplane!? If it were a JH-7 or variant, why is it at SAC 601 facilities in the first place?? :coffee: It is a bit off-topic though, but what is that aircraft sitting there. :confused: It is not the JXX/J-20 - so what is it that SAC 601 is testing there??:confused: This particular image was taken on April 2, 2009 FYI. Is it perhaps the rumored SAC-developed 3.5th generation multi-role fighter with a conventional layout mentioned on Huitong's site? The designation "J-16" is also mentioned there. It does not appear to have wing tip missile rails as on the J-11 and JH-7. Which may indicate that it can carry weapons internally in weapons bays. It also appears to be twin-eingined.
 

Attachments

  • china unknown 5e71f54bgvb19t3epmw9x&690.jpg
    china unknown 5e71f54bgvb19t3epmw9x&690.jpg
    21.9 KB · Views: 103
Last edited:

Spoiler56

New Member
Re: New Generation Fighter

This image comes to mind when the rumor of the the rumored Shenyang J-16 multi role fighter comes up. Maybe the "JH-X" handle does not apply here. Perhaps this is the new Shenyang J-16(?);)
 

Attachments

  • jh-x1.jpg
    jh-x1.jpg
    32.2 KB · Views: 66

Spoiler56

New Member
Re: New Generation Fighter

It would appear that the Chengdu J-10B has been flight testing systems that will be used on the new J-20/JXX. Systems such as AESA radar, IRST, and the DSI air intake system(? perhaps). And other avionics. That might explain why there has not been any series production of the J-10B and it not entering PLAAF service. Also it is reported that the J-20 will have an in-flight retractable refueling probe, and the gun system will be the single barrel Chinese-produced version of the GSh-301, the same as used in the J-11 (Su-27).
:coffee:
 
Last edited:

Spoiler56

New Member
Re: New Generation Fighter

And what is "Sin-91" my dear Challenge? I'm curious here. It's a term that I have never heard of before.
 
Last edited:

Subedei

Banned Idiot
Re: New Generation Fighter

Okay, here goes!

First of all, hello to everyone here.

I'm kind'a new, so I expect to unintentionally offend some of you here as that seems to be how it goes in virtual communications.

So, anyway!

From reading posts in this forum, it seems that many of us are getting our info from much the same sources. So, my questions won't solicit speculation as to the design or nomenclature of the J-XX finished product, but inquire more into the processes by which that product will be achieved.

So, first, do we expect that the Chinese defnse industry will attempt to introduce the J-XX as a wholly synthesized indigenous pkg, including: a new airframe, engine, radar, and avionics, or do we expext that these elements will be introduced separately?

Second, does anyone know of a good source of information on progress being made with the ws10a/g and ws-15 turbofans?
It seems to me that mastering the development and mass production of these engines is vital to the evolution of a 4++ - 5th generation aircraft.

Third, do we expect that the J-XX will actually be intended to achieve parity with the 5th generation F-22 and T-50, or do we expect that it will be intended to achieve superiority over the 4++ generation Rafle and Typhoon?
I ask this because several sources suggest that the J-XX will be a canard based platform and my understanding is that canards increase the RCS. Am I misinformed on this point? And, yes, I do recognize that this last question does engage in speculation as to the design of the J-XX finished product, but it does so to gain an understanding of the designers' intentions.

Thanks!!!
 
Last edited:

Centrist

Junior Member
Re: New Generation Fighter

Okay, here goes!

First of all, hello to everyone here.

I'm kind'a new, so I expect to unintentionally offend some of you here as that seems to be how it goes in virtual communications.

So, anyway!

From reading posts in this forum, it seems that many of us are getting our info from much the same sources. So, my questions won't solicit speculation as to the design or nomenclature of the J-XX finished product, but inquire more into the processes by which that product will be achieved.

So, first, do we expect that the Chinese defnse industry will attempt to introduce the J-XX as a wholly synthesized indigenous pkg, including: a new airframe, engine, radar, and avionics, or do we expext that these elements will be introduced separately?

Second, does anyone know of a good source of information on progress being made with the ws10a/g and ws-15 turbofans?
It seems to me that mastering the development and mass production of these engines is vital to the evolution of a 4++ - 5th generation aircraft.

Third, do we expect that the J-XX will actually be intended to achieve parity with the 5th generation F-22 and T-50, or do we expect that it will be intended to achieve superiority over the 4++ generation Rafle and Typhoon?
I ask this because several sources suggest that the J-XX will be a canard based platform and my understanding is that canards increase the RCS. Am I misinformed on this point? And, yes, I do recognize that this last question does engage in speculation as to the design of the J-XX finished product, but it does so to gain an understanding of the designers' intentions.

Thanks!!!

No, you won't offend anyone, as you are new. I'll try my best to answer your questions good sir.


I am not quite sure what you mean by "introduced separately." A 5th generation fighter jet is a complete system. However, in terms of the J-XX or J-20, I would say it is likely that the first 25-50 of the jets will use improved WS-10 engines, sometimes known as the WS-10G. Later ones will use the super-cruising engine, which is presumably the WS-15.

There is extremely few reliable sources of information on Chinese military developments period, let alone engine development. Personally, I know no good English sources for that, but Maya seems to be the most knowledgeable on this forum.

Third, we don't know that much about the J-XX, but it will have:

supercruise
stealth
super-maneuverability

Most people would argue that the J-XX would be in between the T-50 and F22 in terms of overall capability.

But I caution having too much confidence on the F22. Yes, the J-XX's canards would affect its RCS, but both the Chinese and Russians are taking a different approach to 5th gen fighters than the US is. The US has put a lot of effort in stealth, and while the advantages of stealth are numerable, it cannot be the only thing considered:

The F22 will almost certainly have superior super-cruise than J-XX
However, the F22 only has 2 dimension thrust vectoring. Both the T-50 and the J-XX (presumably) will have 3D vectoring, correct me if I am wrong but I think that gives the JXX an advantage.

Both will have AESA radars, it's hard to say which will be more advanced, the US is ahead but the radars themselves will be 10+ years old by then (that is a long time in electronics terms).

The J-XX will probably have an IRST system, which the F22 lacks.

The JXX is likely to have a superior cockpit featuring a single LCD screen, compared to the multiple screens of the F22.

The F22 will certainly be stealthier in both radar and IR compared to the JXX, however that will come at the cost of greatly increased maintenance costs and logistical problems.

Therefore, the JXX and F22 will both have their respective strengths.
 

Blitzo

General
Staff member
Super Moderator
Registered Member
Re: New Generation Fighter

Third, do we expect that the J-XX will actually be intended to achieve parity with the 5th generation F-22 and T-50, or do we expect that it will be intended to achieve superiority over the 4++ generation Rafle and Typhoon?
I ask this because several sources suggest that the J-XX will be a canard based platform and my understanding is that canards increase the RCS. Am I misinformed on this point? And, yes, I do recognize that this last question does engage in speculation as to the design of the J-XX finished product, but it does so to gain an understanding of the designers' intentions.

The J-XX will be seeking to achieve parity with the F-22 -- late last year on CCTV a PLAAF general said somethign along the lines of "going to match the F-22 as close as possible" (performance wise).

And the idea that canards increase RCS is not true -- then V tails should increase RCS massively as well. there have been many previous American steatlh fighter proposals with canards.
There was a JSF proposal with canards:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


And also a NATF proposal by Northrop Grumman (the guys who made the B-2):
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


So canards are definitely not unstealthy -- the US and Russia just haven't used them because the safer option is to go conventional whereas China's first real indigenous fighter had canards and is thus their safer option.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top