Actually using chips on budget phones actually could be a sign of lower yield. Cause the way Chip manufacturing works is that a certain percentage of chips are upto design spec and have no failed areas, those are designated as the top of the line flagship processors.
There is a certain percentage that have some regions or cores which are in non-working condition. Those chips are then designated as the mid-range chip.
Finally, you have chips that have most of its cores in a non-working condition, those chips are then designated as budget chips. This is how intel for example designates its core I9, i7, i-3 and then celeron chips.
If Huawei chips are high yield, that means most of the production chips will be used on flagship phones. If there is lower yield, that means more chips will not be upto flagship specs and those will then be used on budget phones.
I don't actually know what's your point here? So, getting a fully working chip with no issues leads to lower yield, so they run ones with some issues at lower clock and maybe disable a core on other ones to have a much higher yield. That seems normal and logical.
Why would they not use all the chips they produced? Do you think their chip limited or demand limited on the Mate/Pura phones?
The fact that they are able to put flagship chips a little downgraded onto lower end product means that they have enough capacity now to actually put more capable chips on non-flagship phones.
this is not how things works.
in semiconductor fabrication it is the opposite. Yield refers to the percentage of functional, non-defective chips produced from a single silicon wafer with same efforts and manufacturing. higher yield means less defective chips and more useable chips hence more chips for different products.
also yield is different on different chips. SoC chip usually have higher yield and Ai chips have less yields. there are so many mistakes in that article.
Edit- i just saw this. guy deleted his tweet. maybe this report is about Ai chips.
well, may you should have calmed down instead of getting so worked up about the original post. The report including the yield and the capacity likely was only talking about for AI chip production.
15k wpm for next year is a reasonable number. If we assume 2 400mm2 die for Ascend-950 and 50% yield (smaller die vs Ascend-910B die), then you could get close to 80 good die per chip or 40 good Ascend-950s.
40 * 15000 = 600k per month or 7 million in one year. Of course, Huawei will need to split up that production with Alibaba PPU, Kunolunxin and others. So 5 million ascend is probably the upper limit (likely lower since they need to ramp up production and will produce larger and lower yielding 910B/C dies).
And then let's say another 15k wpm is used to produce server CPUs and PC CPUs. That leaves maybe 30k left for Kirin chips for phones, tablets, smart wearables and everything else. Not sure how much this leaves for other chip designers.
But 60k wpm next year is possible.