They are clearly niche aircrafts that in all normal uses are worse than aircrafts of the same weight.
Same can be said about literally any additional weight on aircraft - lack of ejection seat can make them even better in normal uses, for example.
Military aircraft aren't built for normal uses in the first place, and normality is vulnerability in the first place.
Furthermore, all things should apply in real world, rather than only in theory. Like, as mentioned before, in principle it's always possible making better aircraft via removing VTOL weight and going away from balanced weight distribution.
In practice, world has finite resources, and best attack aircraft in the world is actually VTOL. Just because it was produced to a more successful and enduring specification, and built well.
On the opposite end, when even it is here(f-35b/a), we play with primary and secondary requirements. Is f-35b weaker than f-35a? Sort of.
Does it matter in most missions and even formations? Not really.
Does it make f-35b weaker v f-35a(or anything else) directly? Not at all, it literally doesn't matter.