2025 Israel - Iranian conflict

AndrewJ

Junior Member
Registered Member
A nice video demonstrates how dropping at least two GBU-57 at each point precisely, one after one, can destroy Iran's deepest enrichment plant, Fordow. :eek:

One is not enough, at least two is needed. Also precision matters here. But it's indeed achievable.


1750301191563.png1750301213486.png
 
Last edited:

TK3600

Major
Registered Member
Even if Iranian AD is intact, I don't think they actually have much of anything that would possess a threat to IDF fighters. Most of their air defense is S-200. Wouldn't have much faith in any of their domestic systems either.
Sure they do. Last time they locked on IAF's plane and they had to return. They are dangerous enough. And if they could, IDF never hold back. They would bomb the hell out of Iran already.
 

AndrewJ

Junior Member
Registered Member
Was it deployed by lsra3l?

Nope.

This thing is 13.6 tonnes in weight, can only be carried by USAF B-52 or B-2 bombers. Israel has no bombers.

B-2 can carry 2 of this thing in a load.

What Israel has is small versions of this bomb, aka GBU-28/32/72, around 0.5~2 tonnes, that can be carried by fighter jets, but significantly not enough to penetrate Iran's enrichment plants. They are around 80~90 meters in depth, too much for small bunker busters.
 
Last edited:

FairAndUnbiased

Brigadier
Registered Member
Just for reference, even HQ-7s have an IR TV guided warhead with 15 km range in addition to radar. And Iran has a copy of it.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

If a bomber is lost to a HQ-7, it will be a huge humiliation.

Iran also has 300 km range domestic missiles reversed engineered from the S-300 so the escorts have to be all F-35s unless they mount a grinding slow SEAD campaign. But even that means tanking up very close to Iran. It gets quite complicated if Iran has any surviving AD.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 

RottenPanzer

Junior Member
Registered Member
I think F-35 would be difficult to defeat for any 4th gen jet without good AWACS and ground radar. But having the ability to shoot down UK and US refueling tankers would have diminished Israeli attack capabilities significantly. I'm more surprised about the lack of MANPADS to take down Israeli drones and other slow moving air assets.

Pretty sure the downed Israeli Hermes drones from yesterday is due to MANPADS since how largely intact the airframe is.
 

texx1

Junior Member
A nice video demonstrates how dropping at least two GBU-57 at each point precisely, one after one, can destroy Iran's deepest enrichment plant, Fordow. :eek:


View attachment 154839View attachment 154840

Trump wants assurance that GBU-57 (MOP) strikes would destroy Fordow. The pentagon is confident that it would work.

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Trump presses aides on whether bunker-buster plan to bomb Iran will work

Trump wants to make sure such an attack is really needed, wouldn't drag the U.S. into a prolonged war in the Middle East — and most of all, would actually achieve the objective of destroying Iran's nuclear program, U.S. officials say.

Trump has specifically asked his military advisers whether the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) would destroy Fordow, a U.S. official said.

Pentagon officials told Trump they're confident it would, according to the official. But it's not clear Trump was totally convinced.

"The bunker buster will work. It's not a capabilities issue. We have the capability. But there's an entire plan (for a possible attack). It's not just drop a bunker buster and declare victory," another top U.S. official said.
 

another505

New Member
Registered Member
I dont believe that they are here to remove nukes so any agreement wouldn't work, they are here to replace the regime friendly to trump and israel. Crazy that in 1953, USA and Britain removed the democratically elected leader of Iran to a corrupt one which lead to the revolution. Now they are here again to make a whole pig's breakfast again
 
Top