Crisis in the Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
...

For Russia, splitting the Ukraine in half would be 95% bad news. The rump of Ukraine would be permanently hostile and NATO's bases would be extended into its territory. Meanwhile, the EU would be forced to accommodate the new sick child, and Germany would have to contend with yet another opponent of cooperation with Russia, perhaps within the EU.

The only benefit for Russia in this scenario would be partial and short term: those military industries in Zaporozhia, etc would be kept from NATO's hands.

I wonder what in your opinion could NATO possibly get from companies like
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(I think this one is the biggest in the area you probably meant) ... I'm asking because about one or two months ago I read at gazeta.ru "the Russian perspective" of a serious problem which is the Ukrainian export of military gadgets to Russia; the article said that while several important Russian military projects would be seriously hampered without an access to the imported parts (the substitute production in Russia is planned but delayed -- the article said), the Ukrainian production cannot be sold anywhere else in the world as it's pretty specific to fit into the Russian weaponry (I recall the article mentioned helicopter engines -- you can hardly sell an engine for the newest model of a helicopter which you don't have :) ... but I'm just asking, maybe you know the specifics of Ukrainian "defense" industry or something
 

Red Moon

Junior Member
I wonder what in your opinion could NATO possibly get from companies like
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
(I think this one is the biggest in the area you probably meant) ... I'm asking because about one or two months ago I read at gazeta.ru "the Russian perspective" of a serious problem which is the Ukrainian export of military gadgets to Russia; the article said that while several important Russian military projects would be seriously hampered without an access to the imported parts (the substitute production in Russia is planned but delayed -- the article said), the Ukrainian production cannot be sold anywhere else in the world as it's pretty specific to fit into the Russian weaponry (I recall the article mentioned helicopter engines -- you can hardly sell an engine for the newest model of a helicopter which you don't have :) ... but I'm just asking, maybe you know the specifics of Ukrainian "defense" industry or something

I only know what I've learned here :eek:. It's not that anybody else can use it (save China), but that Russia can be further "sanctioned" if a hostile party controls these plants, particularly someone who doesn't care about the economy of the region.
 
I only know what I've learned here :eek:.

then, if I were you, I wouldn't touch this subject :)

It's not that anybody else can use it (save China), but that Russia can be further "sanctioned" if a hostile party controls these plants, particularly someone who doesn't care about the economy of the region.

then I should add one more thing from that gazeta.ru article I mentioned in #712: in a long run, Ukraine can't count on the Russian dependence on the weapon components produced in Ukraine -- I think the article said this dependence officially should be removed in two years, but will be delayed, however, there are several Russian companies which have been competing for the replacement production, so it's just a matter of time ... and roughly 100 thousands job in Ukraine industry would be gone -- again, I only repeat what I've read

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

check item #17 -- but that's the end of the supply chain, I guess
 

SampanViking

The Capitalist
Staff member
Super Moderator
VIP Professional
Registered Member
I saw this and thought this would be of interest to many of you

It is a long vid of Militia of Motorola's brigade sweeping Ilovaysk on Aug 20th.
This one comes with English subtitles

[video=youtube_share;sWGOSouJPg8]http://youtu.be/sWGOSouJPg8[/video]
 

Equation

Lieutenant General
col cossad's map looks different from what i saw on militarymap.info i guess you can say this one is relatively more conservative in its estimates. nevertheless, both depicts a catastrophic scenario for ukr army.

i have no doubt that even if the amrovsiika cauldron was legit and it ends up being liquidated ukraine will still be able to bounce back. but in conjuction with the potential loss of mariupol, i think this will raise questions about the futility of continuing this war. the government will no doubt come under increasing scrutiny on how the war is actually going. and that, in turn, will fulfill the premise of a political settlement i have alluded to earlier. when the public sees no end to the suffering, the government is in trouble.

Sorry but I think the Rebels are losing according to that map. Every time I look at the Col. Cossad's Sitrep Map those white areas of Rebel strong hold are getting smaller and smaller.
 

Red Moon

Junior Member
Sorry but I think the Rebels are losing according to that map. Every time I look at the Col. Cossad's Sitrep Map those white areas of Rebel strong hold are getting smaller and smaller.

The notionally "rebel held" areas are pink, not white.
 

pla101prc

Senior Member
Sorry but I think the Rebels are losing according to that map. Every time I look at the Col. Cossad's Sitrep Map those white areas of Rebel strong hold are getting smaller and smaller.

lol you lookin at the same map as me bro? rebel strongholds are labeled in pink on col cossad's map.

anyways i used to follow bbc's map just last week, thinking the war is going well for Ukraine. til information starts to come out that made me question the legitimacy of that map. after lookin around i find col cossad's map to be one of those that i can trust. though i think it is a lil too optimistic for the rebels, still way better than bbc's map though.
 

TerraN_EmpirE

Tyrant King
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Ukrainian President Dissolves Parliament and asks for Elections.

[video=youtube_share;0cz7A2bxU4Y]http://youtu.be/0cz7A2bxU4Y[/video]
"Victory Parade" in DPR
Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War said:
Article 3

In the case of armed conflict not of an international character occurring in the territory of one of the High Contracting Parties, each party to the conflict shall be bound to apply, as a minimum, the following provisions:

1. Persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including members of armed forces who have laid down their arms and those placed hors de combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, without any adverse distinction founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any other similar criteria.

To this end the following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever with respect to the above-mentioned persons:

(a) Violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds, mutilation, cruel treatment and torture;

(b) Taking of hostages;

(c) Outrages upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment;

(d) The passing of sentences and the carrying out of executions without previous judgment pronounced by a regularly constituted court affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.

2. The wounded and sick shall be collected and cared for.

An impartial humanitarian body, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, may offer its services to the Parties to the conflict.

The Parties to the conflict should further endeavour to bring into force, by means of special agreements, all or part of the other provisions of the present Convention.

The application of the preceding provisions shall not affect the legal status of the Parties to the conflict.
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Last edited:

Equation

Lieutenant General
The notionally "rebel held" areas are pink, not white.

lol you lookin at the same map as me bro? rebel strongholds are labeled in pink on col cossad's map.

anyways i used to follow bbc's map just last week, thinking the war is going well for Ukraine. til information starts to come out that made me question the legitimacy of that map. after lookin around i find col cossad's map to be one of those that i can trust. though i think it is a lil too optimistic for the rebels, still way better than bbc's map though.


Doh...pardon me I can't read Russian or Ukrainian.:eek::p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top