At lease both China and US agreed on one thing : no dateline.
So who wanted a deal badly?
POTUS keeps telling us China does! LOL
At lease both China and US agreed on one thing : no dateline.
So who wanted a deal badly?
Navarro is speaking the language of Americans. It's just like how they believe in a zero-sum game. In order for them to win, the other side has to completely lose. Negotiation is seen by Americans as weakness. Americans think that applies in trade too. With that mentality how can the US lose jobs in the solar industry when solar panels are not made in America? So if it's not 100% American on their end, it's as good as losing.
What's happening is not about trade or Trump. It's about stopping China progression to be the world biggest economy and the power that comes with it. And the easiest and cheapest way is to use Hong Kong's situation to get the PLA to take action. When PLA moves in, American and the West will start sanctions against China. Just like the Tiananmen incident. This will hinder or stop China rise, not tariffs. US needs China as a market but not as a competitor. Meanwhile China is buying time to diversify their markets and self sufficiency. So deal or no deal, the future is sealed.I love reading all these articles that claim because of the jobs report having positive news for Trump gives him leverage against China. How? So Trump can have no deal like has been happening since he claimed China was going to be on it knees begging for a deal on day one of his trade war? Again like I've been saying, if the US doesn't need China why would they care about making a deal at all. If China is the one that wants the deal so badly, why is Beijing getting Trump mad when they stall on a deal that the US supposedly doesn't need? And let's ignore the fact that Trump's next round of tariffs hits all of the US corporations that outsource to China to which Trump has been avoiding mostly so far. It basically comes down to this is just spin so Americans vote for Trump.
as "The Committee decided to maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 1‑1/2 to 1-3/4 percent."Jan 31, 2019
now
Fed keeps interest rates steady, but signals potential rate cuts in 2019 as pressure mounts
and it looked like Trump might blow it, while now ...checked
Dow: 18,332.74
(presidential elections)
and now
22,494.87
Dec 21, 3:28 PM EST
22495-18333=4162 still
Dec 21, 2018
and it looked like Trump might blow it, while now ...
Dow Jones Industrial Average
27,911.30
Dec 11, 2019 5:01 PM EST
about 24% percent up about one year later
I love reading all these articles that claim because of the jobs report having positive news for Trump gives him leverage against China. How? So Trump can have no deal like has been happening since he claimed China was going to be on it knees begging for a deal on day one of his trade war? Again like I've been saying, if the US doesn't need China why would they care about making a deal at all. If China is the one that wants the deal so badly, why is Beijing getting Trump mad when they stall on a deal that the US supposedly doesn't need? And let's ignore the fact that Trump's next round of tariffs hits all of the US corporations that outsource to China to which Trump has been avoiding mostly so far. It basically comes down to this is just spin so Americans vote for Trump.