US Navy DDG 1000 Zumwalt Class

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Anyone want to take a guess the name of the first Kapitan for DDG 1000 USS Zumwalt?

You can't make this stuff up!

Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Hehehe...maybe after serving on the Zumwalt, he will be promoted and will serve as the captain of the USS Enterprise, CVN-80, when it is built in a few years.

Now THAT would be something, Captain James A. Kirk of the warship USS Enterprise!
 

bd popeye

The Last Jedi
VIP Professional
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


PASCAGOULA, Miss., July 24, 2013 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Huntington Ingalls Industries' (NYSE:HII) Ingalls Shipbuilding division announced today it has delivered the final aft peripheral vertical launch system (PVLS) assemblies to the U.S. Navy for the Zumwalt-class destroyer Michael Monsoor (DDG 1001). The two units for the PVLS were delivered a week early.

A photo accompanying this release is available at
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


"Our shipbuilders have done an outstanding job in incorporating lessons learned from the first aft PVLS products," said Ingalls DDG 1000 Program Manager Steve Sloan. "Delivering these products a week early demonstrates smart shipbuilding by using previous experiences to integrate an improved plan to do it better the second time around. With a constant focus on safety and quality, our shipbuilders have done outstanding work on these units."

General Dynamics' Bath Iron Works is building the DDG 1001 hull, while Ingalls is building the PVLS assemblies in Pascagoula and the composite hangar and deckhouse at the company's composite center of excellence in Gulfport. The PVLS distributes the missile launchers for the destroyer in separate four-cell launcher compartments along the ship's hull. It is an alternative to the traditional centralized missile magazines found on DDG 51-class ships. The PVLS launcher configuration was chosen to significantly enhance the ship's survivability.

Four assembly units make up the aft PVLS. The first two units were delivered in July 2012. The rest of the DDG 1001 work is expected to be complete in the first quarter of 2014.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Great news! The second vessel is making great progress. The PVLS will be excellent, distributing the missiles around the peripheral of the vessel and making the vessel far more survivable, and far more capable of continuing fighting in case of a hit to its missiles.


pvls2.jpg


pvls3.jpg


Mk_57_VLS_16_Auto_1.jpg

 

asif iqbal

Lieutenant General
Zumwalt shows that one aspect of naval operations, that is that naval gun support will be part of over all package well into the 21st century

It's pretty unbelievable that naval gun can fire projectile 60 miles away, this is now going to be used by land army's too, recently a howitzer built by Germany hit targets 33km away

It's a fast very economical way to attack, freeing up the use of Tomahawks or other expensive weapons
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Zumwalt shows that one aspect of naval operations, that is that naval gun support will be part of over all package well into the 21st century

It's pretty unbelievable that naval gun can fire projectile 60 miles away, this is now going to be used by land army's too, recently a howitzer built by Germany hit targets 33km away

It's a fast very economical way to attack, freeing up the use of Tomahawks or other expensive weapons
Yes...and once the rail gun (which are already being tested) are ready, the trend will continue on even further...with much more range...up to 200 nautical miles.


Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!




[video=youtube;fEbfQOBUAEo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fEbfQOBUAEo[/video]
US NAVY NAVSEA TESTS RAIL GUN

[video=youtube;NWZPp3aEjuM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NWZPp3aEjuM[/video]
GENERAL ATOMICS VIDEO RELEASE IF THE RAIL GUN DEVELOPMENT

Working prototypes will be delivered and begin live-fire testing in 2014. I expect the initial production variety to be available around 2020, and probably installed in the early 2020s.
 

delft

Brigadier
Zumwalt shows that one aspect of naval operations, that is that naval gun support will be part of over all package well into the 21st century

It's pretty unbelievable that naval gun can fire projectile 60 miles away, this is now going to be used by land army's too, recently a howitzer built by Germany hit targets 33km away

It's a fast very economical way to attack, freeing up the use of Tomahawks or other expensive weapons
OT
Near the end of WWI the German army used a modified naval gun to fire shells over about 100 km at Paris. These guns were fired until they burst. Not very practical.

At the end of WWII the German army had 31 cm caliber smooth bore railway guns firing arrow shell over a range of 100 km, and with rocket assist 160 km. Of course without air cover these guns were of little value.
 

shen

Senior Member
Zumwalt shows that one aspect of naval operations, that is that naval gun support will be part of over all package well into the 21st century

It's pretty unbelievable that naval gun can fire projectile 60 miles away, this is now going to be used by land army's too, recently a howitzer built by Germany hit targets 33km away

It's a fast very economical way to attack, freeing up the use of Tomahawks or other expensive weapons

Not very economical actually. Had the USN picked the alternative Arsenal Ship concept, the plan was to shoot ATACMS missiles out of VLS for shore bombardment. ATACMS has longer range, 500lb payload, far more effective against hardened target, vs 24lb payload for 155mm LRLAP round. ATACMS cost about $1 million each, LRLAP about $50,000. so you do the math. money spent on AGS development could've also been saved and Arsenal Ship with 5000 VLS tubes only cost $500million vs $4 Billion for Zumwalt with 80 VLS.
 

no_name

Colonel
Arsenal ship is not very survivable operating by itself. The idea of DDG 1000 is to free up supports.

Plus for a lot of fire support role using missile is overkill.
 

Jeff Head

General
Registered Member
Arsenal ship is not very survivable operating by itself. The idea of DDG 1000 is to free up supports.

Plus for a lot of fire support role using missile is overkill.
Exactly.

I favor making a large radar ship out of the new LPD II design, but putting at least 40 PVLS cells on it, a couple of RAMs and a couple of Phalanx so it can also defend itself adequately if necessary. If nothing else, for leakers that get through her CG and DDG screen.
 
Last edited:
Top