US Military News, Reports, Data, etc.

When It Comes to the Navy, Size Matters
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


"During his recent confirmation hearing, just-confirmed Secretary of the Navy Richard V. Spencer specifically
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
on the opportunity to reinforce the 350-ship goal ..."

as an armchair admiral, I noticed Jul 14, 2017
Wednesday at 2:54 PM
and here's DefenseNews story A 355-ship Navy? We’ll see, says Trump’s Navy secretary pick

source:
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
anyway what the author ignores is the White House got involved in the LCS PORK Jul 10, 2017
Jul 1, 2017

... details emerging:

"On May 23, the U.S. Navy rolled out its 2018 budget request that included one littoral combat ship, or LCS. The logic was that since Congress had given the Navy three in fiscal year 2017, an additional one would keep both builders — Wisconsin-based Marinette Marine and Alabama-based Austal USA — afloat.

But inside the White House, alarm bells went off in some sectors. Peter Navarro, the head of U.S. President Donald Trump’s trade and industrial policy office, was looking at information indicating one ship could trigger layoffs at both shipyards. Those concerns were shared by senior Trump aides Rick Dearborn and Stephen Miller — both old hands of long-time Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions — and together they lobbied and prevailed upon Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney to add a second ship to the request."

Life support: The Navy's struggle to define a LCS bare minimum
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

goes on below due to size limit
which may create an illusion of "capacity" while those ships are unarmed (and their "capability" is hyped EDIT as in ludicrous fantasizing: Missile Sponges & Network Nodes
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
)
 
Last edited:

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Scoop !

Modified X-47B Breaks Cover As Testbed For MQ-25 Bid

Northrop Grumman is using an X-47B unmanned air vehicle (UAV) as a flying testbed for air refueling systems in support of its proposal for the U.S. Navy’s upcoming MQ-25A Stingray unmanned aerial refueling tanker contest. First details of Northrop Grumman’s preparations for the MQ-25A bid have emerged in photographs obtained by Aviation Week of a modified X-47B at the U.S. Air Force’s Plant 42 facility in Palmdale, Calif. The photos appear to show the UAV ...
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


X-47B flying testbed for @USNavy MQ-25A Stingray .jpg
 
according to NavyTimes Less than half of the US bomber fleet is ready to 'fight tonight'
23 hours ago
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!


Less than half of the bombers President Donald Trump would rely upon to be “locked and loaded” against North Korea could launch today if needed, according to the latest Air Force figures available.


That’s not a surprise to the bomb squadrons who have seen firsthand the combined effects of aircraft age, the demand of 15 years of air war operations and reduced budgets. But the numbers can be stark. Of the nation’s 75 conventional and nuclear B-52s, only about 33 are ready to fly at any given time, according to Air Force statistics. Of the 62 conventional B-1s, only about 25 are ready. With the 20 nuclear B-2 stealth bombers, the number drops further. Seven or eight bombers are available, according to the Air Force.

“On a nominal basis you don’t have more than single digits of B-2s available to do anything,” said retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Dave Deptula, currently the dean of the Mitchell Institute of Aerospace.

“If anything good comes out of the North Korea crisis,” it should be a wake-up call, he said.

“It’s not just the nation’s bomber force,” that is so stretched, Deptula said. “It’s the military writ large. The U.S. Air Force is the smallest and least ready it’s ever been in history – that should get people’s attention.”

Despite the reduced numbers, the bombers can still meet the president’s call if needed, said Col. Robert Lepper, chief of the combat aircraft division at Air Force Global Strike Command.

“All three of our bomber fleets are capable of meeting their missions – they’ve always dealt with reduced bombers,” Lepper said. “Specifically with the B-2 fleet – we make decisions every day how to best utilize the aircraft … and meet the requirements that are there for us in that given day.”

The B-2’s primary mission is nuclear deterrence. It made a rare conventional run against Islamic State forces in Libya in January. But the B-2 is largely held back from a conventional role; otherwise there would not be enough available aircraft to keep its pilots fully trained and not enough fully ready bombers to meet national security requirements.

Overall, there are 20 B-2s in the Air Force arsenal. While the B-2 is the youngest bomber in service, it is still a 21-year-old airframe, and it’s undergoing modernization. At any given time, two are in programmed depot maintenance and another two are in long-term modernization overhaul, leaving a fleet of 16. At least one B-2 is dedicated to research and testing, Col. Michael Lawrence, chief of the Air Force’s maintenance division, said in an interview this spring.

But even fewer than that - only 38 percent on average, meaning seven or eight of the 20 B-2s - are available at any given time, both Lawrence and Lepper said. Worse, the Air Force reports that on average, only 51 percent of those available aircraft are mission capable.

Three B-2s deployed to Andersen Air Force Base in Guam in 2016, but there are limited facilities there to support their advanced maintenance needs. In other shows of force to North Korea, the bombers have deployed from their home at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri.

“There’s one specific hangar that can meet all the B-2 needs” at Guam, Lepper said. “But they have to share.”

There are 62 remaining B-1 bombers, and like the B-2 they also require modernization. About six are undergoing programmed depot maintenance at any given time – long-term overhauls that take the aircraft offline. Another six or so are unavailable because of the Air Force’s upgrade program, where each of the now 30-year-old airframes will eventually get modern cockpit features to improve the B-1’s situational awareness, communications and network capabilities, Lawrence said.

The depot time means the Air Force on average has about 50 available B-1s. According to the fiscal year 2016 numbers, the latest statistics available, 51.6 percent of the available B-1s are mission capable. Those statistics align with what the B-1 fleet has experienced for the last several years.

The nation’s B-1s are split between Dyess Air Force Base in Texas and Ellsworth Air Force Base in South Dakota, and are easier to deploy overseas than the B-2.

The defense of Guam and South Korea is now partially in the hands of six Ellsworth B-1s and 350 airmen from the 37th Expeditionary Bomb Squadron who rotated to Andersen in late July. They relieved Dyess’ departing 9th Expeditionary Bomb Squadron, according to the Air Force.

Those six forward deployed B-1s will “face a large number of the same problems that we face at home,” Lepper said, including demand for spare parts, scheduled maintenance and unscheduled maintenance.

However, forward-deployed B-1s are sent with “a robust maintenance team and have the top priority for parts across the Air Force,” Lepper said.

The Dyess unit that just returned from Guam was able to maintain a 74 percent mission capable rate during the six months it was overseas, Lepper said.

The oldest bomber in the fleet, the B-52, actually has the highest mission capable rates of all three bombers. Over the last several years 60 percent of the B-52s have been available to fly, meaning about 45 airframes. Those B-52s are an average 54 years old apiece, yet the fleet was also reporting 74 percent mission capable rate.

The B-52 has a conventional and nuclear role. To meet the requirements of the new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) non-proliferation treaty, the Air Force began converting 29 of its remaining B-52s in 2015 to a conventional-only role, and finished that process in 2017, the Air Force said in a statement. The remaining B-1 fleet still can support both a conventional and nuclear role.

The B-52s higher rate of mission capability is the result of an extensive overhaul the aircraft went through over the last several years and the fact that there were previously hundreds of B-52s, so there are plenty of spare parts remaining, Lepper said.

Despite the challenges facing all three airframes, Lepper was confident.

“The bomber fleet is ready,” he said.
 
now noticed
U.S. Navy, Raytheon deliver 4,000th Tomahawk Block IV cruise missile
August 15, 2017
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Raytheon Company and the U.S. Navy have delivered the 4,000th Tomahawk™ Block IV cruise missile to the fleet. The highly advanced missile can circle for hours, shift course instantly on command and strike with pinpoint accuracy.

Raytheon Company (NYSE: RTN) and the U.S. Navy have delivered the 4,000th Tomahawk™ Block IV cruise missile to the fleet.

Launched from ships or submarines, the Tomahawk missile can fly into heavily defended airspace 1,000 miles away to conduct precise strikes on high-value targets with minimal collateral damage.

“When it comes to flexibility, accuracy and firepower, no other cruise missile in the world compares to Tomahawk. That’s why it’s been called the nation’s weapon of choice,” said Mike Jarrett, Raytheon Air Warfare Systems vice president. “We’re not resting on our past success. Raytheon and the U.S. Navy are modernizing Tomahawk to provide sailors with the capability they need to stay ahead of the evolving threat.”

Upgrades to the Tomahawk missile include enhancements to the weapon’s communications and navigation capabilities, while adding a multi-mode seeker so it can hit moving targets at sea. Some of these enhancements will be implemented beginning in 2019. Other upgrades will be phased in over time. Modernized Tomahawk cruise missiles will be in the U.S. Navy’s inventory beyond 2040.

“Navy Sailors around the globe rely on the Tomahawk weapon system to preserve freedom at home and abroad,” said Capt. Mark Johnson of the U.S. Naval Air Systems Command. “Working with Raytheon, we plan to continue upgrading and delivering Tomahawks far into the future.”

Fired in combat more than 2,300 times, Tomahawk cruise missiles are used by U.S. and British forces to defeat integrated air defense systems and conduct long-range precision strike missions against high-value targets.
 
oh really?
Mattis Mulls Plan to Privatize War in Afghanistan
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!

Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said administration officials are mulling the proposal by businessman and former
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Erik Prince to surge private security contractors into Afghanistan to take over duties currently performed by U.S. troops.

“The strategic decisions have not been made, but — I don’t know how to put this — I think that’s all I want to say,” Mattis told reporters Monday at the Pentagon. “The strategic decision has not been made.”

The defense secretary added, “It’s part of the options being considered. And the president’s open to the advice of the secretary of state, and myself and the director of the CIA,” referring to Rex Tillerson at State and Mike Pompeo at the Central Intelligence Agency.

Prince, who founded the private security firm Blackwater that was later renamed to Xe Services and then Academi, first shared his idea for Afghanistan in
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
in The Wall Street Journal, “The MacArthur Model for Afghanistan,” which called for consolidating authority into a viceroy who would lead coalition efforts in the country.

This month, he released more details about the plan to the news media.

The proposal calls for
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
5,500 private contractors, mostly former commandos, to advise Afghan forces, along with a 90-aircraft private air force to provide close air support, according to
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
by USA Today’s Jim Michaels.

The U.S. military currently has more than 8,000 service members in Afghanistan and more than 23,500 contractors, including nearly 1,700 armed contractors, according to a July report from U.S. Central Command.

Mattis had pledged to deliver a new strategy for Afghanistan by mid-July that would rely on increased air power and would also address the long-standing request of
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
Gen. John Nicholson, commander of U.S. Forces-Afghanistan and the NATO Resolute Support Mission, for an additional 3,000 to 5,000 troops.

However, the Mattis plan has been held up as the White House reviews the entire Afghanistan mission amid reports that top advisers to Trump have been recommending a scaled-down U.S. operation — one that could possibly include Prince’s contractor proposal.

On Monday, Mattis said “we are close” to a decision on a new strategy for Afghanistan and said “if there were an increase [in security contractors], we’d tell you there’s going to be an increase. We might not tell you which specific number’s going where. But no, I mean we’d be — we’d be open about — transparent about that.”

He added, “The only things that we’re going to conceal are things that would directly help the enemy. But otherwise, we’re proud of what we do and we’ll tell you.”
 

FORBIN

Lieutenant General
Registered Member
Suggestions especialy same number of frigates than Cruisers and Destroyers

Statement Before the Senate and Armed Services Committee Subcommittee on Seapower Options and Considerations for Achieving a 355-ship Navy
Please, Log in or Register to view URLs content!
 
Top